Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        J. Klensin
Request for Comments: 8254
Obsoletes: 3044, 3187                                          J. Hakala
Category: Standards Track                The National Library of Finland
ISSN: 2070-1721                                             October 2017
        
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        J. Klensin
Request for Comments: 8254
Obsoletes: 3044, 3187                                          J. Hakala
Category: Standards Track                The National Library of Finland
ISSN: 2070-1721                                             October 2017
        

Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Registration Transition

统一资源名称(URN)命名空间注册转换

Abstract

摘要

The original registration procedure for formal Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespaces required IETF Consensus. That requirement discouraged some registrations and increased the risk for problems that could occur as a result. The requirements have now been changed by RFC 8141, which adopts a different model, focusing on encouraging registration and publication of information for all appropriate namespaces. This document clarifies the status of relevant older RFCs and confirms and documents advice to IANA about selected existing registrations. This document also obsoletes RFCs 3044 and 3187 and moves them to Historic status. These RFCs describe the ISSN and ISBN namespaces, which are now outdated because the descriptions reside in registration templates.

正式统一资源名称(URN)命名空间的原始注册过程需要IETF协商一致。这一要求阻碍了一些注册,并增加了可能出现问题的风险。RFC 8141现在改变了要求,它采用了不同的模式,重点是鼓励注册和发布所有适当名称空间的信息。本文件澄清了相关旧RFC的状态,确认并记录了向IANA提供的关于选定现有注册的建议。本文件还淘汰了RFC 3044和3187,并将其移至历史状态。这些RFC描述ISSN和ISBN名称空间,这些名称空间现在已经过时,因为这些描述驻留在注册模板中。

Status of This Memo

关于下段备忘

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

这是一份互联网标准跟踪文件。

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

本文件是互联网工程任务组(IETF)的产品。它代表了IETF社区的共识。它已经接受了公众审查,并已被互联网工程指导小组(IESG)批准出版。有关互联网标准的更多信息,请参见RFC 7841第2节。

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8254.

有关本文件当前状态、任何勘误表以及如何提供反馈的信息,请访问https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8254.

Copyright Notice

版权公告

Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

版权所有(c)2017 IETF信托基金和确定为文件作者的人员。版权所有。

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

本文件受BCP 78和IETF信托有关IETF文件的法律规定的约束(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)自本文件出版之日起生效。请仔细阅读这些文件,因为它们描述了您对本文件的权利和限制。从本文件中提取的代码组件必须包括信托法律条款第4.e节中所述的简化BSD许可证文本,并提供简化BSD许可证中所述的无担保。

Table of Contents

目录

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Obsoleting Older Registration RFCs for ISSNs and ISBNs  . . .   4
     2.1.  ISBN URN Changes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  ISSN URN Changes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  The Older Registration RFC for NBNs . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Other Existing URN Registrations and RFCs . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Registration Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
        
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Obsoleting Older Registration RFCs for ISSNs and ISBNs  . . .   4
     2.1.  ISBN URN Changes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  ISSN URN Changes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  The Older Registration RFC for NBNs . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Other Existing URN Registrations and RFCs . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Registration Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
        
1. Introduction
1. 介绍

As a part of the initial development of the Uniform Resource Name (URN) system in the late 1990s, the IETF URN Working Group agreed that it was important to demonstrate that the URN syntax could accommodate existing identifier systems. RFC 2288 [RFC2288] showed the feasibility of using International Standard Book Number (ISBN), International Standard Serial Number (ISSN), and Serial Item and Contribution Identifier (SICI) [ANSI-SICI] as URNs; however, it did not formally register corresponding URN namespaces. This was in part due to the still-evolving process to formalize criteria for namespace definition documents and registration, consolidated later by the IETF into successive Namespace Definition Mechanism documents [RFC2611] [RFC3406].

作为20世纪90年代末统一资源名称(URN)系统初始开发的一部分,IETF URN工作组一致认为,证明URN语法能够适应现有的标识符系统非常重要。RFC 2288[RFC2288]显示了使用国际标准书号(ISBN)、国际标准序列号(ISSN)和序列项目和贡献标识符(SICI)[ANSI-SICI]作为URN的可行性;但是,它没有正式注册相应的URN名称空间。这部分是由于名称空间定义文档和注册标准的形式化过程仍在不断发展,随后由IETF整合为连续的名称空间定义机制文档[RFC2611][RFC3406]。

URN namespaces were subsequently registered for ISBN [RFC3187] and ISSN [RFC3044] as well as for a fairly large collection of other identifiers including National Bibliography Number (NBN) [RFC3188]. The comprehensive list can be found in the IANA Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespaces registry [IANA-URN] (see also Section 4).

URN名称空间随后被注册为ISBN[RFC3187]和ISSN[RFC3044]以及相当大的其他标识符集合,包括国家书目编号(NBN)[RFC3188]。综合列表可在IANA统一资源名称(URN)命名空间注册表[IANA-URN]中找到(另请参见第4节)。

While a URN namespace for SICI could be registered at any time, the SICI standard has not gained broad international acceptance and has not had a namespace defined to date.

虽然SICI的URN名称空间可以在任何时候注册,但SICI标准尚未获得广泛的国际认可,迄今尚未定义名称空间。

The predecessor registration procedure for URN namespaces [RFC3406] required IETF Consensus for formal namespaces. That requirement discouraged some registrations and increased the risk for problems, including use of names without registration ("squatting"). If names are not registered in a consistent way, there is a possibility of the same name being used to identify different namespaces with different rules, resulting in considerable confusion. The requirements have now been changed in RFC 8141 [RFC8141] to adopt a different model that focuses more on encouraging registration of all namespaces that follow the formal namespace syntax, with as much information collected as possible consistent with that goal.

URN名称空间的前置注册过程[RFC3406]要求IETF对正式名称空间达成一致意见。这一要求阻碍了一些注册,增加了出现问题的风险,包括未经注册使用姓名(“蹲坐”)。如果名称未以一致的方式注册,则可能会使用相同的名称来标识具有不同规则的不同名称空间,从而导致相当大的混淆。RFC 8141[RFC8141]中的要求现在已经更改,以采用一种不同的模型,该模型更侧重于鼓励注册所有遵循正式名称空间语法的名称空间,并尽可能多地收集符合该目标的信息。

Therefore, this document does the following:

因此,本文件具有以下功能:

o Describes the instructions developed with IANA to adapt selected existing registrations to the new model. Those registration updates have been completed for ISBN and ISSN Namespace Identifiers (NIDs) and URN namespaces.

o 描述与IANA一起开发的指令,以使选定的现有注册适应新模型。ISBN和ISSN命名空间标识符(NID)以及URN命名空间的注册更新已经完成。

o Obsoletes the separate RFCs that specify the namespaces for ISSNs and ISBNs to eliminate any ambiguity about the status of new templates and updated registrations.

o 废除为ISSN和ISBN指定名称空间的单独RFC,以消除关于新模板和更新注册状态的任何模糊性。

o Provides information about the status of NBNs under the new definitions.

o 提供有关新定义下NBN状态的信息。

o Provides suggestions to IANA about the handling of other existing registrations not explicitly discussed in this document.

o 就本文件中未明确讨论的其他现有注册的处理向IANA提供建议。

2. Obsoleting Older Registration RFCs for ISSNs and ISBNs
2. 淘汰ISSN和ISBN的旧注册RFC

The existing RFCs that describe URN namespaces for ISSNs [RFC3044] and ISBNs [RFC3187] have been identified as "Historic" concurrent with publication of this document. The new registration templates for those namespaces have already been submitted and incorporated into the URN Namespaces registry by IANA.

描述ISSN[RFC3044]和ISBN[RFC3187]的URN命名空间的现有RFC已被确定为与本文档同时发布的“历史”RFC。IANA已经提交了这些名称空间的新注册模板,并将其合并到URN名称空间注册表中。

Those updated templates reflect not only the new template formats but substantive changes to the definitions of the namespaces. The significant changes are summarized in the subsections that follow.

这些更新的模板不仅反映了新的模板格式,而且反映了名称空间定义的实质性变化。下面的小节总结了重大变化。

For both ISSN and ISBN namespaces, URN registration practices within them are expected to evolve along with the ISO ISBN and ISSN standards without requiring resubmission of the templates or other formal IETF or IANA URN namespace registration update approval procedures. The subsections that follow clarify the relationship between the original URN namespace registrations for ISBN and ISSN and the recently registered templates that follow the principles of RFC 8141. Approval and registration of those new templates made the older templates obsolete.

对于ISSN和ISBN名称空间,其中的URN注册实践预计将随着ISO ISBN和ISSN标准的发展而发展,而无需重新提交模板或其他正式的IETF或IANA URN名称空间注册更新批准程序。下面的小节阐明了ISBN和ISSN的原始URN命名空间注册与最近注册的遵循RFC 8141原则的模板之间的关系。这些新模板的批准和注册使旧模板过时。

2.1. ISBN URN Changes
2.1. ISBN URN更改

The revised ISBN namespace reflects the latest version of the ISO ISBN standard, ISO 2108:2017 [ISO-ISBN-b]. The namespace allows for the use of both the old ten-character ISBN numbers described in RFC 3187 and ISO 2108:1992 [ISO-ISBN-a] (formerly known as ISBN-10) and the thirteen-character identifiers introduced in ISO 2108:2005 [ISO-ISBN-c] (formerly known as ISBN-13).

修订后的ISBN名称空间反映了ISO ISBN标准ISO 2108:2017[ISO-ISBN-b]的最新版本。名称空间允许使用RFC 3187和ISO 2108:1992[ISO-ISBN-a](以前称为ISBN-10)中描述的旧的十字符ISBN编号,以及ISO 2108:2005[ISO-ISBN-c](以前称为ISBN-13)中引入的十三字符标识符。

For more details, review the new ISBN registration template and associated documentation [ISBN-Template].

有关更多详细信息,请查看新的ISBN注册模板和相关文档[ISBN模板]。

2.2. ISSN URN Changes
2.2. ISSN URN更改

The updated ISSN namespace reflects the changes between the current ISSN standard [ISO-ISSN] and its predecessor on which RFC 3044 was based. ISO 3297:2007 introduced the linking ISSN (ISSN-L), which is designated for all media of a serial publication, irrespective of how many there are. Traditional ISSN applies to a single medium only, such as the printed version of a serial.

更新后的ISSN名称空间反映了当前ISSN标准[ISO-ISSN]与其RFC 3044所基于的前身之间的变化。ISO 3297:2007引入了链接ISSN(ISSN-L),它被指定用于一个系列出版物的所有媒体,无论有多少媒体。传统的ISSN仅适用于单一媒介,如连载的印刷版。

For more details, review the new ISSN registration template and associated documentation [ISSN-Template].

有关更多详细信息,请查看新的ISSN注册模板和相关文档[ISSN模板]。

3. The Older Registration RFC for NBNs
3. NBN的旧注册RFC

NBN is not a formal international standard or even a single identifier system but an umbrella concept that covers all of the identifier systems the adopting national libraries and their partners use to identify resources that do not have other identifiers. For instance, if a book received via legal deposit does not have an ISBN, the national library gives it a local identifier. The NBN specification provides a simple means of expressing these local identifiers so that they become globally unique URNs, such as urn:nbn:fi-fe19981001.

NBN不是一个正式的国际标准,甚至不是一个单一的标识符系统,而是一个涵盖所有标识符系统的总括概念,采用该系统的国家图书馆及其合作伙伴用于识别没有其他标识符的资源。例如,如果通过合法寄存收到的书没有ISBN,国家图书馆会给它一个本地标识符。NBN规范提供了一种表示这些本地标识符的简单方法,以便它们成为全局唯一的urn,例如urn:NBN:fi-fe19981001。

In addition to the namespace registration itself, RFC 3188 provides some generic information about NBNs and their use and specifies the syntax of URN:NBNs. That syntax guarantees uniqueness by requiring the usage of country codes and institutional identifiers as a part of the Namespace Specific String (NSS). When RFC 3188 is revised, it should be accompanied with a template that revises the registration of the URN:NBN namespace.

除了名称空间注册本身,RFC3188还提供了一些关于NBN及其使用的通用信息,并指定URN:NBNs的语法。该语法通过要求使用国家代码和机构标识符作为名称空间特定字符串(NSS)的一部分来保证唯一性。修改RFC 3188时,应随附修改URN:NBN命名空间注册的模板。

4. Other Existing URN Registrations and RFCs
4. 其他现有的URN注册和RFC

The RFC Series and the IANA URN Namespaces registry contain many URN namespace registrations in addition to those for which this document calls out explicit actions. In general, those existing registrations are still appropriate but omit some information called for in RFC 8141 [RFC8141]. Reregistration with new templates is recommended but not required. Until and unless those registrations are updated as provided for in RFC 8141, the existing registration templates should be read as not requiring or allowing any features that were not allowed and specified by the earlier URN [RFC2141] and registration [RFC3406] specifications.

RFC系列和IANA URN名称空间注册表包含许多URN名称空间注册,除了本文档调用显式操作的注册之外。一般来说,这些现有注册仍然适用,但省略了RFC 8141[RFC8141]中要求的一些信息。建议使用新模板重新注册,但不是必需的。除非按照RFC 8141的规定更新这些注册,否则应将现有注册模板理解为不需要或不允许早期URN[RFC2141]和注册[RFC3406]规范不允许和指定的任何功能。

5. Registration Examples
5. 注册实例

For examples of registrations using the new model and for information and help in understanding other parts of this document, review the new ISBN and ISSN registration templates [ISBN-Template] [ISSN-Template] and associated documentation in the IANA URN Namespaces registry.

有关使用新模型的注册示例以及了解本文档其他部分的信息和帮助,请查看IANA URN名称空间注册表中的新ISBN和ISSN注册模板[ISBN模板][ISSN模板]和相关文档。

6. IANA Considerations
6. IANA考虑

IANA has completed updates for the registry entries for URN ISSN and ISBN namespaces to reflect the new templates that are compliant with RFC 8141. With respect to namespaces other than those listed above, when registrations and templates are available that conform to the newer rules, they may be substituted for the older ones. However, neither this document nor RFC 8141 supersedes any existing registrations (those for ISBN and ISSN are superseded by the recently registered templates). Therefore, IANA needs to be prepared to maintain a registry whose contents reflect old-style templates for some namespaces and the newer ones for others.

IANA已完成URN ISSN和ISBN名称空间注册表项的更新,以反映符合RFC 8141的新模板。对于上面列出的名称空间以外的名称空间,当符合较新规则的注册和模板可用时,可以用它们代替较旧的规则。但是,本文件和RFC 8141均不取代任何现有注册(ISBN和ISSN的注册被最近注册的模板取代)。因此,IANA需要准备维护一个注册表,该注册表的内容反映了某些名称空间的旧式模板,以及其他名称空间的新模板。

IANA should also note that the portions of the ISBN and ISSN registrations that point to ISO Standards are intended to identify current versions (which may change) rather than only the versions that are active at the time this document is approved (see Section 2). That provision relies on ISO TC 46 and its respective registration authorities to maintain stability of URN references discussed in this document.

IANA还应注意,指向ISO标准的ISBN和ISSN注册部分旨在识别当前版本(可能会更改),而不仅仅是本文件批准时有效的版本(见第2节)。该规定依赖ISO TC 46及其各自的注册机构来维持本文件中讨论的URN参考的稳定性。

7. Security Considerations
7. 安全考虑

While particular URN namespaces and their registrations might conceivably have security implications, this specification merely specifies a transition of a set of namespace registrations and does not have such implications. The security implications associated with particular namespaces are expected to be listed in registration templates as specified in RFC 8141.

虽然特定的URN名称空间及其注册可能具有安全含义,但本规范仅指定一组名称空间注册的转换,而不具有此类含义。按照RFC 8141中的规定,与特定名称空间相关联的安全含义预计将在注册模板中列出。

8. References
8. 工具书类
8.1. Normative References
8.1. 规范性引用文件

[RFC8141] Saint-Andre, P. and J. Klensin, "Uniform Resource Names (URNs)", RFC 8141, DOI 10.17487/RFC8141, April 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8141>.

[RFC8141]Saint Andre,P.和J.Klensin,“统一资源名称(URN)”,RFC 8141,DOI 10.17487/RFC81412017年4月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8141>.

8.2. Informative References
8.2. 资料性引用

[ANSI-SICI] ANSI/NISO, "Serial Item and Contribution Identifier (SICI)", ANSI/NISO Z39.56-1996 (Version 2), August 1996.

[ANSI-SICI]ANSI/NISO,“序列项目和贡献标识符(SICI)”,ANSI/NISO Z39.56-1996(版本2),1996年8月。

[IANA-URN] IANA, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespaces", <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces>.

[IANA-URN]IANA,“统一资源名称(URN)命名空间”<http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces>.

[ISBN-Template] ISBN International Agency, "Namespace Registration for International Standard Book Number (ISBN) ISO 2108:2017", June 2017, <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn>.

[ISBN模板]ISBN国际机构,“国际标准书号(ISBN)ISO 2108:2017的名称空间注册”,2017年6月<https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn>.

[ISO-ISBN-a] ISO, "Information and documentation - International Standard Book Number (ISBN)", ISO 2108:1992, 1992.

[ISO-ISBN-a]ISO,“信息和文献——国际标准书号(ISBN)”,ISO 2108:1992,1992。

[ISO-ISBN-b] ISO, "Information and documentation - International Standard Book Number (ISBN)", ISO 2108:2017, 2017.

[ISO-ISBN-b]ISO,“信息和文献-国际标准书号(ISBN)”,ISO 2108:2017,2017。

[ISO-ISBN-c] ISO, "Information and documentation - International Standard Book Number (ISBN)", ISO 2108:2005, 2005.

[ISO-ISBN-c]ISO,“信息和文献——国际标准书号(ISBN)”,ISO 2108:20052005。

[ISO-ISSN] ISO, "Information and documentation - International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)", ISO 3297:2007, 2007.

[ISO-ISSN]ISO,“信息和文件-国际标准序列号(ISSN)”,ISO 3297:2007。

[ISSN-Template] ISSN International Centre, "Namespace Registration for International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) and Linking ISSN (ISSN-L) based on ISO 3297:2007", June 2017, <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn>.

[ISSN模板]ISSN国际中心,“基于ISO 3297:2007的国际标准序列号(ISSN)和链接ISSN(ISSN-L)的名称空间注册”,2017年6月<https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn>.

[RFC2141] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, DOI 10.17487/RFC2141, May 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2141>.

[RFC2141]护城河,R.,“瓮语法”,RFC 2141,DOI 10.17487/RFC2141,1997年5月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2141>.

[RFC2288] Lynch, C., Preston, C., and R. Daniel, "Using Existing Bibliographic Identifiers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC 2288, DOI 10.17487/RFC2288, February 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2288>.

[RFC2288]Lynch,C.,Preston,C.,和R.Daniel,“使用现有书目标识符作为统一资源名”,RFC 2288,DOI 10.17487/RFC2288,1998年2月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2288>.

[RFC2611] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "URN Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 33, RFC 2611, DOI 10.17487/RFC2611, June 1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2611>.

[RFC2611]Daigle,L.,van Gulik,D.,Iannella,R.,和P.Faltstrom,“URN名称空间定义机制”,BCP 33,RFC 2611,DOI 10.17487/RFC26111999年6月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2611>.

[RFC3044] Rozenfeld, S., "Using The ISSN (International Serial Standard Number) as URN (Uniform Resource Names) within an ISSN-URN Namespace", RFC 3044, DOI 10.17487/RFC3044, January 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3044>.

[RFC3044]Rozenfeld,S.,“在ISSN-URN名称空间中将ISSN(国际序列号)用作URN(统一资源名称)”,RFC 3044,DOI 10.17487/RFC30442001年1月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3044>.

[RFC3187] Hakala, J. and H. Walravens, "Using International Standard Book Numbers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3187, DOI 10.17487/RFC3187, October 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3187>.

[RFC3187]Hakala,J.和H.Walravens,“使用国际标准书号作为统一资源名称”,RFC 3187,DOI 10.17487/RFC3187,2001年10月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3187>.

[RFC3188] Hakala, J., "Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3188, DOI 10.17487/RFC3188, October 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3188>.

[RFC3188]Hakala,J.,“使用国家书目编号作为统一资源名称”,RFC 3188,DOI 10.17487/RFC3188,2001年10月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3188>.

[RFC3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", RFC 3406, DOI 10.17487/RFC3406, October 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3406>.

[RFC3406]Daigle,L.,van Gulik,D.,Iannella,R.,和P.Faltstrom,“统一资源名称(URN)命名空间定义机制”,RFC 3406,DOI 10.17487/RFC3406,2002年10月<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3406>.

Acknowledgements

致谢

This document draws heavily on discussions in the IETF URNbis Working Group in the second and third quarters of 2013, particularly during IETF 87 in August 2013, and on informal discussions during the plenary meeting of ISO TC 46 in June 2013. The efforts of those who participated in those discussions are greatly appreciated. It also draws on Internet-Drafts that were developed to update the older registrations before that approach was replaced by the new extended template model. Those documents were prepared by Pierre Godefroy, Juha Hakala, Alfred Hoenes, and Maarit Huttunen.

本文件大量借鉴了IETF URNbis工作组在2013年第二季度和第三季度的讨论,特别是2013年8月IETF 87期间的讨论,以及2013年6月ISO TC 46全体会议期间的非正式讨论。非常感谢参加这些讨论的人所作的努力。它还利用了在新的扩展模板模型取代以前为更新旧注册而开发的互联网草案。这些文件由皮埃尔·戈德夫罗伊、朱哈·哈卡拉、阿尔弗雷德·霍恩斯和马瑞特·赫图宁编写。

The current specification benefits significantly from a careful reading and suggestions for editorial changes by Peter Saint-Andre; from considerable work by Stella Griffiths of the ISBN International Agency to refine the ISBN discussion and develop the corresponding template; and from Gaelle Bequet, Pierre Godefroy, and Clement Oury of the ISSN International Centre for similar refinements of the ISSN discussion and template.

当前规范从彼得·圣安德烈(Peter Saint Andre)的仔细阅读和编辑修改建议中获益匪浅;ISBN国际机构的Stella Griffiths在完善ISBN讨论和开发相应模板方面做了大量工作;来自ISSN国际中心的盖尔·贝凯、皮埃尔·戈德夫罗伊和克莱门特·奥里,他们对ISSN讨论和模板进行了类似的改进。

Contributors

贡献者

Alfred Hoenes was the editor and co-author of two of the documents from which this one is, in part, derived. This document would not have been possible without his contributions.

阿尔弗雷德·霍恩斯(Alfred Hoenes)是其中两份文件的编辑和合著者,其中一份文件部分来源于这两份文件。没有他的贡献,这份文件是不可能的。

Authors' Addresses

作者地址

John C. Klensin 1770 Massachusetts Ave, Ste 322 Cambridge, MA 02140 United States of America

美国马萨诸塞州剑桥市马萨诸塞大道1770号,邮编:322,邮编:02140

   Phone: +1 617 245 1457
   Email: john-ietf@jck.com
        
   Phone: +1 617 245 1457
   Email: john-ietf@jck.com
        

Juha Hakala The National Library of Finland P.O. Box 15, Helsinki University Helsinki, MA FIN-00014 Finland

Juha Hakala芬兰国家图书馆,邮政信箱15,赫尔辛基大学赫尔辛基,马萨诸塞州,芬兰FIN-00014

   Email: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi
        
   Email: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi