Internet Architecture Board (IAB) N. Brownlee, Ed.
Request for Comments: 6548 The University of Auckland
Obsoletes: 5620 IAB
Category: Informational June 2012
ISSN: 2070-1721
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) N. Brownlee, Ed.
Request for Comments: 6548 The University of Auckland
Obsoletes: 5620 IAB
Category: Informational June 2012
ISSN: 2070-1721
Independent Submission Editor Model
独立提交编辑器模型
Abstract
摘要
This document describes the function and responsibilities of the RFC Independent Submission Editor (ISE). The Independent Submission stream is one of the stream producers that create draft RFCs, with the ISE as its stream approver. The ISE is overall responsible for activities within the Independent Submission stream, working with draft editors and reviewers, and interacts with the RFC Production Center and Publisher, and the RFC Series Editor (RSE). The ISE is appointed by the IAB, and also interacts with the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC).
本文件描述了RFC独立提交编辑器（ISE）的功能和职责。独立提交流是创建RFC草案的流生产者之一，ISE作为其流审批人。ISE全面负责独立提交流中的活动，与草稿编辑和审阅者合作，并与RFC制作中心和出版商以及RFC系列编辑（RSE）互动。ISE由IAB任命，并与IETF行政监督委员会（IAOC）互动。
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
本文件不是互联网标准跟踪规范；它是为了提供信息而发布的。
This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
本文件是互联网体系结构委员会（IAB）的产品，代表IAB认为有价值提供永久记录的信息。IAB批准发布的文件不适用于任何级别的互联网标准；见RFC 5741第2节。
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548.
有关本文件当前状态、任何勘误表以及如何提供反馈的信息，请访问http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548.
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
版权所有（c）2012 IETF信托基金和确定为文件作者的人员。版权所有。
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
本文件受BCP 78和IETF信托有关IETF文件的法律规定的约束(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)自本文件出版之日起生效。请仔细阅读这些文件，因为它们描述了您对本文件的权利和限制。
Table of Contents
目录
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Independent Submission Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1. Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2. Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Independent Submission Editorial Board . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. IAB Members at the Time of Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Independent Submission Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1. Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2. Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Independent Submission Editorial Board . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. IAB Members at the Time of Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
The RFC Editor Model [RFC6635] defines a set of streams that produce draft RFCs, which are submitted for publication. This document defines the management function for the Independent Submission stream, specifically the role of Independent Submission Editor (ISE). This document is a derivative of [RFC5620], Section 3.2, and was separated out from [RFC6635].
RFC编辑器模型[RFC6635]定义了一组生成RFC草案的流，这些草案将提交发布。本文档定义了独立提交流的管理功能，特别是独立提交编辑器（ISE）的角色。本文件是[RFC5620]第3.2节的衍生文件，与[RFC6635]分开。
This document obsoletes [RFC5620] in combination with [RFC6635].
本文件将[RFC5620]与[RFC6635]一起废弃。
The ISE is an individual who is responsible for the Independent Submission stream of RFCs, as defined by [RFC4844]. The Independent Submission stream and the ISE are not under the authority or direction of the RSE or the RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) (see [RFC6635]). As noted below, the ISE is appointed by and is responsible directly to the IAB.
ISE是负责RFC独立提交流的个人，如[RFC4844]所定义。独立提交流和ISE不受RSE或RFC系列监督委员会（RSOC）的授权或指导（见[RFC6635]）。如下文所述，ISE由IAB任命，并直接向IAB负责。
The ISE is a senior position for which the following qualifications are desired:
ISE是一个高级职位，需要具备以下资格：
1. Technical competence, i.e., broad technical experience and perspective across a wide range of Internet technologies and applications, and also the ability to work effectively with portions of that spectrum in which they have no personal expertise.
1. 技术能力，即广泛的互联网技术和应用领域的广泛技术经验和观点，以及与他们没有个人专业知识的部分领域有效合作的能力。
2. Thorough familiarity with the RFC series.
2. 完全熟悉RFC系列。
3. An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review arrangements. If those arrangements include an Editorial Board similar to the current one or some equivalent arrangement, the ability to assess the technical competence of potential Editorial Board members (see Section 3).
3. 能够定义和制定咨询和文件审查安排。如果这些安排包括一个与当前类似的编辑委员会或一些同等安排，则评估潜在编辑委员会成员技术能力的能力（见第3节）。
4. Good standing in the technical community, in and beyond the IETF.
4. 在IETF内外的技术界有良好的声誉。
5. Demonstrated editorial skills, good command of the English language, and demonstrated history of being able to work effectively with technical documents and materials created by others.
5. 具备编辑技能，良好的英语能力，能够有效处理他人编写的技术文档和材料。
6. The ability to work effectively in a multi-actor environment with divided authority and responsibility similar to that described in [RFC6635].
6. 与[RFC6635]中描述的类似，在多参与者环境中有效工作的能力，具有分散的权限和责任。
The ISE is an individual who may have assistants and who is responsible for:
ISE是可能有助手的个人，负责：
1. Maintaining technical quality of the Independent Submission stream.
1. 维护独立提交流的技术质量。
2. Reviewing, approving, and processing Independent Submissions.
2. 审查、批准和处理独立提交的文件。
3. Forwarding draft RFCs in the Independent Submission stream to the RFC Production Center.
3. 将独立提交流中的RFC草案转发至RFC生产中心。
4. Defining and developing the scope of the Independent Submission stream as a part of the overall RFC Editor function [RFC6635].
4. 作为整个RFC编辑器功能的一部分，定义和开发独立提交流的范围[RFC6635]。
5. Reviewing and approving RFC errata for Independent Submissions.
5. 审查和批准独立提交的RFC勘误表。
6. Coordinating work and conforming to general RFC Series policies as specified by the IAB and RSE.
6. 协调工作并遵守IAB和RSE规定的一般RFC系列政策。
7. Providing statistics and documentation as requested by the RSE and/or IAOC.
7. 按照RSE和/或IAOC的要求提供统计数据和文件。
The ISE may choose to select individuals to participate in an Advisory Board for assistance in special topics as the ISE deems appropriate. Such an Advisory Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE.
ISE可选择在其认为适当的情况下，选择个人加入咨询委员会，以协助处理特殊主题。这样一个咨询委员会的存在符合ISE的要求，其成员也符合ISE的要求。
The individual with the listed qualifications is selected by the IAB after input has been collected from the community. An approach similar to the one used by the IAB to select an IAOC member every other year as described in [RFC4333] should be used.
IAB从社区收集信息后，选择具有所列资格的个人。应采用类似于IAB每隔一年选择IAOC成员的方法，如[RFC4333]所述。
While the ISE itself is considered a volunteer function, the IAB considers maintaining the Independent Submission stream part of the IAB's supported activities. Therefore, the IAOC should include these costs in the IASA budget.
虽然ISE本身被视为一项志愿者职能，但IAB考虑维护IAB支持活动的独立提交流部分。因此，IAOC应将这些成本纳入IASA预算。
The ISE is supported by an Editorial Board for the review of Independent Submission stream documents. This board is known as the Independent Submission Editorial Board. This volunteer Editorial Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE. The existence of this board is simply noted within this model, and additional discussion of such is considered out of scope of this document.
ISE由一个编辑委员会支持，用于审查独立的提交流文件。该委员会被称为独立提交编辑委员会。该志愿编辑委员会的存在符合ISE的要求，其成员也符合ISE的要求。本模型中仅说明了该委员会的存在，对该委员会的额外讨论不在本文件范围内。
This document has no specific security implications, however the same security considerations as those in [RFC4846] and [RFC4844] apply.
本文件没有具体的安全含义，但与[RFC4846]和[RFC4844]中的安全注意事项相同。
Bernard Aboba, Ross Callon, Alissa Cooper, Joel Halpern, Spencer Dawkins, Russ Housley, David Kessens, Olaf Kolkman, Danny McPherson, Jon Peterson, Andrei Robachevsky, Dave Thaler, Hannes Tschofenig.
伯纳德·阿博巴、罗斯·卡隆、艾莉莎·库珀、乔尔·哈尔伯恩、斯宾塞·道金斯、罗斯·霍斯利、大卫·凯森斯、奥拉夫·科尔克曼、丹尼·麦克弗森、乔恩·彼得森、安德烈·罗巴切夫斯基、戴夫·泰勒、汉尼斯·茨霍芬尼。
Generous thanks to Joel Hapern for all his help with this document, and for all his work on [RFC6635]). Thanks also to the IAB members, whose comments and suggestions were both welcome and useful.
非常感谢Joel Hapern在本文档中提供的帮助，以及他在[RFC6635]上的所有工作。还要感谢IAB成员，他们的意见和建议既受欢迎又有用。
[RFC4846] Klensin, J. and D. Thaler, "Independent Submissions to the RFC Editor", RFC 4846, July 2007.
[RFC4846]Klensin，J.和D.Thaler，“向RFC编辑提交的独立意见”，RFC 48462007年7月。
[RFC4844] Daigle, L., Ed. and IAB, "The RFC Series and RFC Editor", RFC 4844, July 2007.
[RFC4844]Daigle，L.，Ed.和IAB，“RFC系列和RFC编辑器”，RFC 48442007年7月。
[RFC4333] Huston, G. and B. Wijnen, "The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) Member Selection Guidelines and Process", BCP 113, RFC 4333, December 2005.
[RFC4333]Huston，G.和B.Wijnen，“IETF行政监督委员会（IAOC）成员选择指南和流程”，BCP 113，RFC 4333，2005年12月。
[RFC5620] Kolkman, O. and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 1)", RFC 5620, August 2009.
[RFC5620]Kolkman，O.和IAB，“RFC编辑器模型（版本1）”，RFC562009年8月。
[RFC6635] Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 2)", RFC 6635, June 2012.
[RFC6635]Kolkman，O.，Ed.，Halpern，J.，Ed.，和IAB，“RFC编辑器模型（版本2）”，RFC 66352012年6月。
Authors' Addresses
作者地址
Nevil Brownlee (editor) The University of Auckland
Nevil Brownlee（编辑）奥克兰大学
EMail: n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz
EMail: n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz
Internet Architecture Board
互联网架构委员会
EMail: iab@iab.org
EMail: iab@iab.org