Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) W. George
Request for Comments: 6547 Time Warner Cable
Obsoletes: 3627 February 2012
Updates: 6164
Category: Informational
ISSN: 2070-1721
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) W. George
Request for Comments: 6547 Time Warner Cable
Obsoletes: 3627 February 2012
Updates: 6164
Category: Informational
ISSN: 2070-1721
RFC 3627 to Historic Status
RFC 3627的历史地位
Abstract
摘要
This document moves "Use of /127 Prefix Length Between Routers Considered Harmful" (RFC 3627) to Historic status to reflect the updated guidance contained in "Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links" (RFC 6164). A Standards Track document supersedes an informational document; therefore, guidance provided in RFC 6164 is to be followed when the two documents are in conflict. This document links the two RFCs so that the IETF's updated guidance on this topic is clearer.
本文档将“在被认为有害的路由器之间使用/127前缀长度”（RFC 3627）移至历史状态，以反映“在路由器间链路上使用127位IPv6前缀”（RFC 6164）中包含的更新指南。标准跟踪文件取代信息性文件；因此，当两个文件发生冲突时，应遵循RFC 6164中提供的指南。本文件将两个RFC联系起来，以便IETF关于该主题的更新指南更加清晰。
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
本文件不是互联网标准跟踪规范；它是为了提供信息而发布的。
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
本文件是互联网工程任务组（IETF）的产品。它代表了IETF社区的共识。它已经接受了公众审查，并已被互联网工程指导小组（IESG）批准出版。并非IESG批准的所有文件都适用于任何级别的互联网标准；见RFC 5741第2节。
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6547.
有关本文件当前状态、任何勘误表以及如何提供反馈的信息，请访问http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6547.
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
版权所有（c）2012 IETF信托基金和确定为文件作者的人员。版权所有。
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
本文件受BCP 78和IETF信托有关IETF文件的法律规定的约束(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)自本文件出版之日起生效。请仔细阅读这些文件，因为它们描述了您对本文件的权利和限制。从本文件中提取的代码组件必须包括信托法律条款第4.e节中所述的简化BSD许可证文本，并提供简化BSD许可证中所述的无担保。
Table of Contents
目录
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
This document moves "Use of /127 Prefix Length Between Routers Considered Harmful" [RFC3627] to Historic status in accordance with RFC 2026 [RFC2026]. RFC 3627 has been superseded by "Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links" [RFC6164]. A Standards Track document supersedes an informational document; therefore, guidance provided in RFC 6164 is to be followed when the two documents are in conflict. This may not have been clear to casual readers who are not familiar with the differences in IETF document types. This document adds the necessary link between the two RFCs so that users referring to RFC 3627 for guidance will see that it has been obsoleted by updated guidance on the matter, thus hopefully eliminating any confusion that may be present.
根据RFC 2026[RFC2026]，本文件将“在被认为有害的路由器之间使用/127前缀长度”[RFC3627]移至历史状态。RFC 3627已被“在路由器间链路上使用127位IPv6前缀”取代[RFC6164]。标准跟踪文件取代信息性文件；因此，当两个文件发生冲突时，应遵循RFC 6164中提供的指南。对于不熟悉IETF文档类型差异的普通读者来说，这可能并不清楚。本文件在两个RFC之间添加了必要的链接，以便参考RFC 3627以获取指导的用户将看到，它已被关于该事项的更新指导所淘汰，从而有望消除可能存在的任何混淆。
This document introduces no new security considerations.
本文档没有引入新的安全注意事项。
Thanks to Brian Carpenter, Bob Hinden, and Ron Bonica for guidance on the matter, and to Pekka Savola and Miya Kohno and the other authors of 6164 for their support.
感谢Brian Carpenter、Bob Hinden和Ron Bonica对此事的指导，感谢Pekka Savola和Miya Kohno以及6164的其他作者对此事的支持。
[RFC3627] Savola, P., "Use of /127 Prefix Length Between Routers Considered Harmful", RFC 3627, September 2003.
[RFC3627]Savola，P.，“在路由器之间使用/127前缀长度被认为是有害的”，RFC 3627，2003年9月。
[RFC6164] Kohno, M., Nitzan, B., Bush, R., Matsuzaki, Y., Colitti, L., and T. Narten, "Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links", RFC 6164, April 2011.
[RFC6164]Kohno，M.，Nitzan，B.，Bush，R.，Matsuzaki，Y.，Colitti，L.，和T.Narten，“在路由器间链路上使用127位IPv6前缀”，RFC 61642011年4月。
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[RFC2026]Bradner，S.，“互联网标准过程——第3版”，BCP 9，RFC 2026，1996年10月。
Author's Address
作者地址
Wesley George Time Warner Cable 13820 Sunrise Valley Drive Herndon, VA 20171 US
韦斯利·乔治·时代华纳有线电视13820美国弗吉尼亚州赫恩登日出谷大道20171
Phone: +1 703-561-2540
EMail: wesley.george@twcable.com
Phone: +1 703-561-2540
EMail: wesley.george@twcable.com