Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                           A. Kato
Request for Comments: 5932                      NTT Software Corporation
Obsoletes: 4132                                                 M. Kanda
Category: Standards Track                                            NTT
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                 S. Kanno
                                                NTT Software Corporation
                                                               June 2010
        
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                           A. Kato
Request for Comments: 5932                      NTT Software Corporation
Obsoletes: 4132                                                 M. Kanda
Category: Standards Track                                            NTT
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                 S. Kanno
                                                NTT Software Corporation
                                                               June 2010
        

Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS

茶花密码套件

Abstract

摘要

This document specifies a set of cipher suites for the Transport Security Layer (TLS) protocol to support the Camellia encryption algorithm as a block cipher. It amends the cipher suites originally specified in RFC 4132 by introducing counterparts using the newer cryptographic hash algorithms from the SHA-2 family. This document obsoletes RFC 4132.

本文档为传输安全层(TLS)协议指定了一组密码套件,以支持作为分组密码的Camellia加密算法。它通过引入使用SHA-2家族中较新的加密散列算法的副本,修改了RFC 4132中最初指定的密码套件。本文件淘汰了RFC 4132。

Status of This Memo

关于下段备忘

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

这是一份互联网标准跟踪文件。

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

本文件是互联网工程任务组(IETF)的产品。它代表了IETF社区的共识。它已经接受了公众审查,并已被互联网工程指导小组(IESG)批准出版。有关互联网标准的更多信息,请参见RFC 5741第2节。

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5932.

有关本文件当前状态、任何勘误表以及如何提供反馈的信息,请访问http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5932.

Copyright Notice

版权公告

Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

版权所有(c)2010 IETF信托基金和确定为文件作者的人员。版权所有。

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

本文件受BCP 78和IETF信托有关IETF文件的法律规定的约束(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)自本文件出版之日起生效。请仔细阅读这些文件,因为它们描述了您对本文件的权利和限制。从本文件中提取的代码组件必须包括信托法律条款第4.e节中所述的简化BSD许可证文本,并提供简化BSD许可证中所述的无担保。

This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.

本文件可能包含2008年11月10日之前发布或公开的IETF文件或IETF贡献中的材料。控制某些材料版权的人员可能未授予IETF信托允许在IETF标准流程之外修改此类材料的权利。在未从控制此类材料版权的人员处获得充分许可的情况下,不得在IETF标准流程之外修改本文件,也不得在IETF标准流程之外创建其衍生作品,除了将其格式化以RFC形式发布或将其翻译成英语以外的其他语言。

1. Introduction
1. 介绍

This document proposes the addition of new cipher suites to the Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC5246] protocol to support the Camellia [RFC3713] encryption algorithm as a block cipher algorithm, adding variants using the SHA-2 family of cryptographic hash algorithms [FIPS180-3] to the TLS cipher suite portfolio originally specified in RFC 4132 [RFC4132]. This document obsoletes RFC 4132.

本文件建议在传输层安全(TLS)[RFC5246]协议中添加新的密码套件,以支持作为分组密码算法的Camellia[RFC3713]加密算法,并使用SHA-2系列加密哈希算法[FIPS180-3]将变体添加到最初在RFC 4132中指定的TLS密码套件组合中[RFC4132]。本文件淘汰了RFC 4132。

The Camellia algorithm and its properties are described in [RFC3713].

[RFC3713]中描述了Camellia算法及其属性。

1.1. Terminology
1.1. 术语

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

本文件中的关键词“必须”、“不得”、“必需”、“应”、“不应”、“应”、“不应”、“建议”、“可”和“可选”应按照[RFC2119]中所述进行解释。

2. Proposed Cipher Suites
2. 建议的密码套件

The cipher suites defined here have the following identifiers:

此处定义的密码套件具有以下标识符:

  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x41 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x42 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x43 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x44 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x45 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x46 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x41 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x42 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x43 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x44 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x45 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x46 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x84 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x85 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x86 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x87 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x88 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x89 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x84 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x85 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x86 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x87 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x88 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x89 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xBA };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBB };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBC };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBD };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBE };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBF };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xBA };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBB };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBC };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBD };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBE };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBF };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xC0 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC1 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC2 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC3 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC4 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC5 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xC0 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC1 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC2 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC3 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC4 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC5 };
        
3. Cipher Suite Definitions
3. 密码套件定义
3.1. Key Exchange
3.1. 密钥交换

The RSA, DHE_RSA, DH_RSA, DHE_DSS, DH_DSS, and DH_anon key exchanges are performed as defined in [RFC5246].

RSA、DHE_RSA、DH_RSA、DHE_DSS、DH_DSS和DH_anon密钥交换按照[RFC5246]中的定义执行。

3.2. Cipher
3.2. 密码

The CAMELLIA_128_CBC cipher suites use Camellia [RFC3713] in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode with a 128-bit key and 128-bit IV; the CAMELLIA_256_CBC cipher suites use a 256-bit key and 128-bit IV.

CAMELLIA_128_CBC密码套件在密码块链接(CBC)模式下使用CAMELLIA[RFC3713],具有128位密钥和128位IV;CAMELLIA_256_CBC密码套件使用256位密钥和128位IV。

3.3. Hash and Pseudorandom Function
3.3. 散列与伪随机函数
3.3.1. Hash and Pseudorandom Function for TLS 1.1
3.3.1. TLS 1.1的哈希和伪随机函数

The cipher suites ending with _SHA use HMAC-SHA1 as the MAC algorithm.

以_SHA结尾的密码套件使用HMAC-SHA1作为MAC算法。

When used with TLS versions prior to 1.2, the pseudorandom function (PRF) is calculated as specified in the appropriate version of the TLS specification.

当与1.2之前的TLS版本一起使用时,伪随机函数(PRF)按照TLS规范相应版本中的规定计算。

3.3.2. Hash and Pseudorandom Function for TLS 1.2
3.3.2. TLS 1.2的哈希和伪随机函数

The cipher suites ending with _SHA256 use HMAC-SHA-256 as the MAC algorithm. The PRF is the TLS PRF [RFC5246] with SHA-256 as the hash function. These cipher suites MUST NOT be negotiated by TLS 1.1 or earlier versions. Clients MUST NOT offer these cipher suites if they do not offer TLS 1.2 or later. Servers that select an earlier version of TLS MUST NOT select one of these cipher suites.

以_SHA256结尾的密码套件使用HMAC-SHA-256作为MAC算法。PRF是TLS PRF[RFC5246],SHA-256作为哈希函数。TLS 1.1或更早版本不得协商这些密码套件。如果客户不提供TLS 1.2或更高版本,则不得提供这些密码套件。选择TLS早期版本的服务器不得选择这些密码套件之一。

4. IANA Considerations
4. IANA考虑

IANA has updated the entries for the following numbers that were allocated in RFC 4132 to reference this document:

IANA已更新RFC 4132中分配的以下编号的条目,以参考本文件:

  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x41 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x42 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x43 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x44 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x45 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x46 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x41 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x42 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x43 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x44 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x45 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x46 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x84 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x85 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x86 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x87 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x88 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x89 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA         = { 0x00,0x84 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x85 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA      = { 0x00,0x86 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x87 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x88 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA     = { 0x00,0x89 };
        

IANA has allocated the following numbers in the TLS Cipher Suite Registry:

IANA已在TLS密码套件注册表中分配了以下号码:

  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xBA };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBB };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBC };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBD };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBE };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBF };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xBA };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBB };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xBC };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBD };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBE };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xBF };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xC0 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC1 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC2 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC3 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC4 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC5 };
        
  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256      = { 0x00,0xC0 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC1 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256   = { 0x00,0xC2 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC3 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC4 };
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256  = { 0x00,0xC5 };
        
5. Security Considerations
5. 安全考虑

At the time of writing this document, there are no known weak keys for Camellia, and no security problem has been found on Camellia (see [NESSIE], [CRYPTREC], and [LNCS]).

在编写本文档时,没有已知的Camellia弱密钥,并且在Camellia上也没有发现任何安全问题(请参见[NESSIE]、[CRYPTREC]和[LNCS])。

Also, security issues are discussed throughout RFC 5246 [RFC5246], especially in Appendices D, E, and F.

此外,RFC 5246[RFC5246]中讨论了安全问题,尤其是附录D、E和F。

6. References
6. 工具书类
6.1. Normative References
6.1. 规范性引用文件

[FIPS180-3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Secure Hash Standard (SHS)", FIPS PUB 180, October 2008, <http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-3/ fips180-3_final.pdf>.

[FIPS180-3]国家标准与技术研究所,“安全哈希标准(SHS)”,FIPS PUB 180,2008年10月<http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-3/ fips180-3_final.pdf>。

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

[RFC2119]Bradner,S.,“RFC中用于表示需求水平的关键词”,BCP 14,RFC 2119,1997年3月。

[RFC3713] Matsui, M., Nakajima, J., and S. Moriai, "A Description of the Camellia Encryption Algorithm", RFC 3713, April 2004.

[RFC3713]Matsui,M.,Nakajima,J.,和S.Moraii,“茶花加密算法的描述”,RFC 37132004年4月。

[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008.

[RFC5246]Dierks,T.和E.Rescorla,“传输层安全(TLS)协议版本1.2”,RFC 5246,2008年8月。

6.2. Informative References
6.2. 资料性引用

[CRYPTREC] Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA), "Cryptography Research and Evaluation Committees", <http://www.ipa.go.jp/security/enc/CRYPTREC/ index-e.html>.

[CRYPTREC]信息技术促进局(IPA),“密码学研究和评估委员会”<http://www.ipa.go.jp/security/enc/CRYPTREC/ index-e.html>。

[LNCS] Mala, H., Shakiba, M., and M. Dakhil-alian, "New Results on Impossible Differential Cryptanalysis of Reduced Round Camellia-128", LNCS 5867, November 2009, <http://www.springerlink.com/content/e55783u422436g77/>.

[LNCS]Mala,H.,Shakiba,M.和M.Dakhil alian,“简化圆茶花-128不可能差分密码分析的新结果”,LNCS 58672009年11月<http://www.springerlink.com/content/e55783u422436g77/>.

[NESSIE] "The NESSIE project (New European Schemes for Signatures, Integrity and Encryption)", <http://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/nessie/>.

[NESSIE]“NESSIE项目(新的欧洲签名、完整性和加密方案)”<http://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.be/nessie/>.

[RFC4132] Moriai, S., Kato, A., and M. Kanda, "Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC 4132, July 2005.

[RFC4132]Moraii,S.,Kato,A.,和M.Kanda,“将茶花密码套件添加到传输层安全(TLS)”,RFC 4132,2005年7月。

Authors' Addresses

作者地址

Akihiro Kato NTT Software Corporation

加藤昭宏NTT软件公司

   Phone: +81-45-212-9803
   Fax:   +81-45-212-9800
   EMail: kato.akihiro@po.ntts.co.jp
        
   Phone: +81-45-212-9803
   Fax:   +81-45-212-9800
   EMail: kato.akihiro@po.ntts.co.jp
        

Masayuki Kanda NTT

神田正辅

   Phone: +81-422-59-3456
   Fax:   +81-422-59-4015
   EMail: kanda.masayuki@lab.ntt.co.jp
        
   Phone: +81-422-59-3456
   Fax:   +81-422-59-4015
   EMail: kanda.masayuki@lab.ntt.co.jp
        

Satoru Kanno NTT Software Corporation

Satoru Kanno NTT软件公司

   Phone: +81-45-212-9803
   Fax:   +81-45-212-9800
   EMail: kanno.satoru@po.ntts.co.jp
        
   Phone: +81-45-212-9803
   Fax:   +81-45-212-9800
   EMail: kanno.satoru@po.ntts.co.jp