Network Working Group T. Taylor
Request for Comments: 5125 Nortel
Obsoletes: 3525 February 2008
Category: Informational
Network Working Group T. Taylor
Request for Comments: 5125 Nortel
Obsoletes: 3525 February 2008
Category: Informational
Reclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic
将RFC 3525重新分类为历史记录
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
本备忘录为互联网社区提供信息。它没有规定任何类型的互联网标准。本备忘录的分发不受限制。
Abstract
摘要
This document reclassifies RFC 3525, Gateway Control Protocol Version 1, to Historic Status. This memo also obsoletes RFC 3525.
本文件将RFC 3525网关控制协议版本1重新分类为历史状态。本备忘录还废除了RFC 3525。
The purpose of this document is to reclassify RFC 3525, Gateway Control Protocol Version 1, to Historic Status.
本文件的目的是将RFC 3525网关控制协议版本1重新分类为历史状态。
The protocol defined by RFC 3525 [RFC3525] was developed jointly by the IETF Megaco Working Group and ITU-T Study Group 16. The ITU-T published ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1 (originally H.248) with the same contents as RFC 3525. Since that initial development, the ITU-T has taken ownership of the protocol and has continued to work on it. The protocol as originally defined in RFC 3525 underwent a series of corrections and clarifications. H.248.1 version 1 [h248v1] was republished in March, 2002, incorporating all changes agreed upon up to that date. Since then, further corrections have been agreed upon. The accumulated set of corrections to H.248.1 (03/2002) is available in the Implementors' Guide for Recommendation H.248.1 Version 1 (03/ 2002) ("Media Gateway Control Protocol") [impgdv1], which is available at no charge on the ITU-T web site.
RFC 3525[RFC3525]定义的协议由IETF Megaco工作组和ITU-T研究组16联合开发。ITU-T发布了ITU-T建议H.248.1（原H.248），内容与RFC 3525相同。自最初的发展以来，ITU-T已经取得了该协议的所有权，并继续致力于该协议。RFC 3525中最初定义的方案经过了一系列更正和澄清。H.248.1第1版[h248v1]于2002年3月重新发布，纳入了截至该日期商定的所有变更。此后，双方商定了进一步的更正。H.248.1（2002年3月）的累积修正集可在建议H.248.1第1版（2002年3月）（“媒体网关控制协议”）[impgdv1]的实施者指南中获得，该指南可在ITU-T网站上免费获得。
RFC 3525 has been rendered even more obsolete as a specification of the Megaco/H.248 protocol by the publication of further versions of ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1. Version 2 [h248v2] was published in May, 2002, and is the version most widely deployed at present. It is also the version that other standards bodies such as 3GPP are currently using as the basis for their own profile specifications. Version 3 [h248v3] was published more recently, in September, 2005.
随着ITU-T建议H.248.1进一步版本的发布，RFC 3525作为Megaco/H.248协议的规范变得更加过时。版本2[h248v2]于2002年5月发布，是目前部署最广泛的版本。它也是3GPP等其他标准机构目前正在使用的版本，作为其自身概要文件规范的基础。版本3[h248v3]最近于2005年9月发布。
In short, RFC 3525 may serve as an introduction to the Megaco/H.248 protocol, but it is misleading as a description of the protocol as currently standardized or deployed. It is appropriate to reclassify RFC 3525 to Historic status, as described in RFC 2026 [RFC2026].
简言之，RFC 3525可以作为Megaco/H.248协议的介绍，但作为对当前标准化或部署的协议的描述，它具有误导性。将RFC 3525重新分类为历史状态是合适的，如RFC 2026[RFC2026]所述。
Reclassifying RFC 3525 has no security implications.
重新分类RFC 3525没有安全影响。
This document does not require any new actions by the IANA. The IANA registries established by RFC 3525 and extended by successive versions of ITU-T H.248.1 remain in force, along with the requirement for expert review by an IESG-designated expert.
本文件不要求IANA采取任何新措施。由RFC 3525建立并由ITU-T H.248.1后续版本扩展的IANA登记册仍然有效，同时要求由IESG指定的专家进行专家审查。
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[RFC2026]Bradner，S.，“互联网标准过程——第3版”，BCP 9，RFC 2026，1996年10月。
[RFC3525] Groves, C., Ed., Pantaleo, M., Ed., Anderson, T., Ed., and T. Taylor, Ed., "Gateway Control Protocol Version 1", RFC 3525, June 2003.
[RFC3525]Groves，C.，Ed.，Pantaleo，M.，Ed.，Anderson，T.，Ed.，和T.Taylor，Ed.，“网关控制协议版本1”，RFC 35252003年6月。
[h248v1] International Telecommunication Union, "Gateway control protocol: Version 1", ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1, March 2002.
[h248v1]国际电信联盟，“网关控制协议：第1版”，ITU-T建议H.248.1，2002年3月。
[h248v2] International Telecommunication Union, "Gateway control protocol: Version 2", ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1, May 2002.
[h248v2]国际电信联盟，“网关控制协议：第2版”，ITU-T建议H.248.1，2002年5月。
[h248v3] International Telecommunication Union, "Gateway control protocol: Version 3", ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1, September 2005.
[h248v3]国际电信联盟，“网关控制协议：第3版”，ITU-T建议H.248.1，2005年9月。
[impgdv1] International Telecommunication Union, "Implementors' Guide for Recommendation H.248.1 Version 1 (03/2002) ("Media Gateway Control Protocol")", ITU-T Recommendation H.248.1, April 2006.
[impgdv1]国际电信联盟，“建议H.248.1第1版（2002年3月）（“媒体网关控制协议”）的实施指南”，ITU-T建议H.248.1，2006年4月。
Author's Address
作者地址
Tom Taylor Nortel 1852 Lorraine Ave Ottawa, Ontario K1H 6Z8 Canada
Tom Taylor Nortel 1852加拿大安大略省渥太华洛林大道K1H 6Z8
EMail: taylor@nortel.com
EMail: taylor@nortel.com
Full Copyright Statement
完整版权声明
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
版权所有（C）IETF信托基金（2008年）。
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
本文件受BCP 78中包含的权利、许可和限制的约束，除其中规定外，作者保留其所有权利。
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
本文件及其包含的信息以“原样”为基础提供，贡献者、他/她所代表或赞助的组织（如有）、互联网协会、IETF信托基金和互联网工程任务组不承担任何明示或暗示的担保，包括但不限于任何保证，即使用本文中的信息不会侵犯任何权利，或对适销性或特定用途适用性的任何默示保证。
Intellectual Property
知识产权
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
IETF对可能声称与本文件所述技术的实施或使用有关的任何知识产权或其他权利的有效性或范围，或此类权利下的任何许可可能或可能不可用的程度，不采取任何立场；它也不表示它已作出任何独立努力来确定任何此类权利。有关RFC文件中权利的程序信息，请参见BCP 78和BCP 79。
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
向IETF秘书处披露的知识产权副本和任何许可证保证，或本规范实施者或用户试图获得使用此类专有权利的一般许可证或许可的结果，可从IETF在线知识产权存储库获取，网址为http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
IETF邀请任何相关方提请其注意任何版权、专利或专利申请，或其他可能涵盖实施本标准所需技术的专有权利。请将信息发送至IETF的IETF-ipr@ietf.org.