Network Working Group G. Zorn
Request for Comments: 4603 G. Weber
Category: Informational R. Foltak
Cisco Systems
July 2006
Network Working Group G. Zorn
Request for Comments: 4603 G. Weber
Category: Informational R. Foltak
Cisco Systems
July 2006
Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute
NAS端口类型属性的其他值
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
本备忘录为互联网社区提供信息。它没有规定任何类型的互联网标准。本备忘录的分发不受限制。
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
IESG Note
IESG注释
This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard. The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any purpose and in particular notes that the decision to publish is not based on IETF review for such things as security, congestion control, or inappropriate interaction with deployed protocols. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion. Readers of this document should exercise caution in evaluating its value for implementation and deployment. See RFC 3932 for more information.
本RFC不适用于任何级别的互联网标准。IETF不承认本RFC适用于任何目的的任何知识，特别注意到，发布决定并非基于IETF对安全、拥塞控制或与已部署协议的不当交互等事项的审查。RFC编辑已自行决定发布本文件。本文档的读者在评估其实施和部署价值时应谨慎。有关更多信息，请参阅RFC 3932。
Abstract
摘要
This document defines a set of values for the NAS-Port-Type RADIUS Attribute.
本文档定义了NAS端口类型RADIUS属性的一组值。
Table of Contents
目录
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. NAS-Port-Type Values ............................................2
3. IANA Considerations .............................................2
3.1. Attribute Values ...........................................2
4. Security Considerations .........................................2
5. References ......................................................3
5.1. Normative References .......................................3
5.2. Informative References .....................................3
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. NAS-Port-Type Values ............................................2
3. IANA Considerations .............................................2
3.1. Attribute Values ...........................................2
4. Security Considerations .........................................2
5. References ......................................................3
5.1. Normative References .......................................3
5.2. Informative References .....................................3
This document defines a set of new values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute [RFC2865].
本文档为NAS端口类型属性[RFC2865]定义了一组新值。
This document defines new values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute. This specification concerns the following values:
本文档定义了NAS端口类型属性的新值。本规范涉及以下值：
30 PPPoA (PPP over ATM [RFC3336])
30 PPPoA（ATM上的PPP[RFC3336]）
31 PPPoEoA (PPP over Ethernet [RFC2516] over ATM)
31 PPPoOA（ATM上的以太网PPP[RFC2516]
32 PPPoEoE (PPP over Ethernet [RFC2516] over Ethernet)
32 PPPoE（以太网PPP[RFC2516]以太网）
33 PPPoEoVLAN (PPP over Ethernet [RFC2516] over VLAN)
33 PPPoOVLAN（通过VLAN的以太网PPP[RFC2516]
34 PPPoEoQinQ (PPP over Ethernet [RFC2516] over IEEE 802.1QinQ)
34 PPPoEQ（通过IEEE 802.1Q的以太网PPP[RFC2516]
This document is intended to act as a request for allocation of the numbers listed by IANA in the appropriate registry [RADTYP], according to the allocation policy given in [RFC3575].
本文件旨在根据[RFC3575]中给出的分配政策，作为IANA在相应注册表[RADTYP]中列出的号码分配请求。
The values given have already been implemented by at least one vendor without assignment by IANA.
给定的值已由至少一家供应商实施，且未经IANA分配。
IANA has registered the numbers listed in Section 2, per this request.
IANA已根据本请求登记了第2节中列出的编号。
This specification neither adds to nor detracts from the security of the RADIUS protocol.
本规范既不增加也不降低RADIUS协议的安全性。
[RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June 2000.
[RFC2865]Rigney，C.，Willens，S.，Rubens，A.，和W.Simpson，“远程认证拨入用户服务（RADIUS）”，RFC 28652000年6月。
[RFC3575] Aboba, B., "IANA Considerations for RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service)", RFC 3575, July 2003.
[RFC3575]Aboba，B.“RADIUS（远程认证拨入用户服务）的IANA注意事项”，RFC 3575，2003年7月。
[RADTYP] Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "RADIUS TYPES", November 2005, <http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types>.
[RADTYP]互联网分配号码管理局，“半径类型”，2005年11月<http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types>.
[RFC2516] Mamakos, L., Lidl, K., Evarts, J., Carrel, D., Simone, D., and R. Wheeler, "A Method for Transmitting PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE)", RFC 2516, February 1999.
[RFC2516]Mamakos，L.，Lidl，K.，Evarts，J.，Carrel，D.，Simone，D.，和R.Wheeler，“通过以太网传输PPP（PPPoE）的方法”，RFC 2516，1999年2月。
[RFC3336] Thompson, B., Koren, T., and B. Buffam, "PPP Over Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2 (AAL2)", RFC 3336, December 2002.
[RFC3336]Thompson，B.，Koren，T.，和B.Buffam，“异步传输模式适应层2（AAL2）上的PPP”，RFC 3336，2002年12月。
Authors' Addresses
作者地址
Glen Zorn Cisco Systems 2901 Third Avenue, Suite 600 SEA1/5/ Seattle, WA 98121 US
美国华盛顿州西雅图第三大道2901号Glen Zorn Cisco Systems 600室SEA1/5
Phone: +1 (425) 344 8113
EMail: gwz@cisco.com
Phone: +1 (425) 344 8113
EMail: gwz@cisco.com
Greg Weber Cisco Systems 10850 Murdock Road KNV/1/ Knoxville, TN 37932 US
美国田纳西州诺克斯维尔市默多克路KNV/1号格雷格·韦伯思科系统10850号，邮编37932
EMail: gdweber@cisco.com
EMail: gdweber@cisco.com
Rich Foltak Cisco Systems 2200 East President George Bush Turnpike RCDN6/4/2 Richardson, TX 75082 US
Rich Foltak Cisco Systems 2200东总统乔治·布什收费公路RCDN6/4/2德克萨斯州理查森75082美国
Phone: +1 (469) 255-6557
EMail: rfoltak@cisco.com
Phone: +1 (469) 255-6557
EMail: rfoltak@cisco.com
Full Copyright Statement
完整版权声明
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78 and at www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
本文件受BCP 78和www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html中包含的权利、许可和限制的约束，除其中规定外，作者保留其所有权利。
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
本文件及其包含的信息是按“原样”提供的，贡献者、他/她所代表或赞助的组织（如有）、互联网协会和互联网工程任务组不承担任何明示或暗示的担保，包括但不限于任何保证，即使用本文中的信息不会侵犯任何权利，或对适销性或特定用途适用性的任何默示保证。
Intellectual Property
知识产权
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
IETF对可能声称与本文件所述技术的实施或使用有关的任何知识产权或其他权利的有效性或范围，或此类权利下的任何许可可能或可能不可用的程度，不采取任何立场；它也不表示它已作出任何独立努力来确定任何此类权利。有关RFC文件中权利的程序信息，请参见BCP 78和BCP 79。
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
向IETF秘书处披露的知识产权副本和任何许可证保证，或本规范实施者或用户试图获得使用此类专有权利的一般许可证或许可的结果，可从IETF在线知识产权存储库获取，网址为http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
IETF邀请任何相关方提请其注意任何版权、专利或专利申请，或其他可能涵盖实施本标准所需技术的专有权利。请将信息发送至IETF的IETF-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
确认
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
RFC编辑器功能的资金由IETF行政支持活动（IASA）提供。