Network Working Group B. Haberman
Request for Comments: 4292 Johns Hopkins University
Obsoletes: 2096 April 2006
Category: Standards Track
Network Working Group B. Haberman
Request for Comments: 4292 Johns Hopkins University
Obsoletes: 2096 April 2006
Category: Standards Track
IP Forwarding Table MIB
IP转发表MIB
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
本文件规定了互联网社区的互联网标准跟踪协议，并要求进行讨论和提出改进建议。有关本协议的标准化状态和状态，请参考当前版本的“互联网官方协议标准”（STD 1）。本备忘录的分发不受限制。
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
Abstract
摘要
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects related to the forwarding of Internet Protocol (IP) packets in an IP version-independent manner. This document obsoletes RFC 2096.
本文档定义了管理信息库（MIB）的一部分，用于Internet社区中的网络管理协议。特别地，它描述了与以独立于IP版本的方式转发Internet协议（IP）数据包相关的托管对象。本文件废除了RFC 2096。
Table of Contents
目录
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Conventions Used In This Document ...............................2
3. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
4. Overview ........................................................2
4.1. Relationship to Other MIBs .................................3
4.1.1. RFC 1213 ............................................3
4.1.2. RFC 1354 ............................................3
4.1.3. RFC 2096 ............................................3
4.1.4. RFC 2011 and 2465 ...................................3
5. Definitions .....................................................3
6. Security Considerations ........................................30
7. Changes from RFC 2096 ..........................................31
8. Normative References ...........................................32
9. Informative References .........................................32
10. Authors and Acknowledgements ..................................33
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Conventions Used In This Document ...............................2
3. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
4. Overview ........................................................2
4.1. Relationship to Other MIBs .................................3
4.1.1. RFC 1213 ............................................3
4.1.2. RFC 1354 ............................................3
4.1.3. RFC 2096 ............................................3
4.1.4. RFC 2011 and 2465 ...................................3
5. Definitions .....................................................3
6. Security Considerations ........................................30
7. Changes from RFC 2096 ..........................................31
8. Normative References ...........................................32
9. Informative References .........................................32
10. Authors and Acknowledgements ..................................33
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use in managing objects related to the forwarding of Internet Protocol (IP) packets in an IP version-independent manner.
本文档定义了管理信息库（MIB）的一部分，用于以独立于IP版本的方式管理与转发Internet协议（IP）数据包相关的对象。
It should be noted that the MIB definition described herein does not support multiple instances based on the same address family type. However, it does support an instance of the MIB per address family.
应当注意，本文描述的MIB定义不支持基于相同地址族类型的多个实例。但是，它确实支持每个地址族的MIB实例。
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
本文件中的关键词“必须”、“不得”、“要求”、“应”、“不应”、“应”、“不应”、“建议”、“可”和“可选”应按照RFC 2119[RFC2119]中所述进行解释。
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
有关描述当前互联网标准管理框架的文件的详细概述，请参阅RFC 3410[RFC3410]第7节。
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [RFC2580].
托管对象通过虚拟信息存储（称为管理信息库或MIB）进行访问。MIB对象通常通过简单网络管理协议（SNMP）进行访问。MIB中的对象是使用管理信息结构（SMI）中定义的机制定义的。本备忘录规定了符合SMIv2的MIB模块，如STD 58、RFC 2578[RFC2578]、STD 58、RFC 2579[RFC2579]和STD 58、RFC 2580[RFC2580]所述。
The MIB consists of one current table and two current global objects.
MIB由一个当前表和两个当前全局对象组成。
1. The object inetCidrRouteNumber indicates the number of current routes. This is primarily to avoid having to read the table in order to determine this number.
1. 对象inetCidrRouteNumber表示当前路由的数量。这主要是为了避免为了确定该数字而必须阅读表格。
2. The object inetCidrRouteDiscards counts the number of valid routes that were discarded from inetCidrRouteTable for any reason. This object replaces the ipRoutingDiscards and ipv6DiscardedRoutes objects.
2. 对象INETCIDRROUTEICARDS统计因任何原因从inetCidrRouteTable丢弃的有效路由数。此对象替换ipRoutingDiscards和ipv6DiscardedRoutes对象。
3. The inetCidrRouteTable provides the ability to display IP version-independent multipath CIDR routes.
3. inetCidrRouteTable提供了显示独立于IP版本的多路径CIDR路由的能力。
This MIB definition contains several deprecated and obsolete tables and objects. The following subsections describe the relationship between these objects and other MIB modules.
此MIB定义包含几个已弃用和过时的表和对象。以下小节描述了这些对象与其他MIB模块之间的关系。
The ipRouteTable object was originally defined in RFC 1213 [RFC1213]. It was updated by ipForwardTable in RFC 1354 [RFC1354].
ipRouteTable对象最初是在RFC 1213[RFC1213]中定义的。它由RFC1354[RFC1354]中的ipForwardTable更新。
The ipForwardTable object replaced the ipRouteTable object from RFC 1213. It was in turn obsoleted by the ipCidrRouteTable defined in RFC 2096 [RFC2096].
ipForwardTable对象替换了RFC 1213中的ipRouteTable对象。它又被RFC 2096[RFC2096]中定义的ipCidrRouteTable淘汰。
In addition, RFC 1354 introduced ipForwardNumber. This object reflects the number of entries found in ipForwardTable. It was obsoleted by ipCidrRouteNumber, defined in RFC 2096.
此外，RFC1354引入了ipForwardNumber。此对象反映在ipForwardTable中找到的条目数。它被RFC 2096中定义的IPCIDROUTENUMBER淘汰。
In RFC 2096, the ipCidrRouteTable and ipCidrRouteNumber were introduced. The ipCidrRouteTable object supports multipath IP routes having the same network number but differing network masks. The number of entries in that table is reflected in ipCidrRouteNumber. These objects are deprecated by the definitions contained in this MIB definition.
在RFC 2096中，引入了IPCIDROUTTETABLE和IPCIDROUTTENUMBER。ipCidrRouteTable对象支持具有相同网络号但不同网络掩码的多路径IP路由。该表中的条目数反映在IPCIDROUTENUMBER中。此MIB定义中包含的定义不推荐使用这些对象。
RFC 2011 [RFC2011] contains the ipRoutingDiscards object, which counts the number of valid routes that have been removed from the ipCidrRouteTable object. The corresponding ipv6DiscardedRoutes object is defined in RFC 2465 [RFC2465]. These objects are deprecated in favor of the version-independent object inetCidrRouteDiscards defined in this MIB.
RFC 2011[RFC2011]包含ipRoutingDiscards对象，该对象统计已从IPCIDROUTTETABLE对象中删除的有效路由数。RFC 2465[RFC2465]中定义了相应的ipv6DiscardedRoutes对象。这些对象已被弃用，取而代之的是在此MIB中定义的版本无关对象inetCidrRouteDiscards。
IP-FORWARD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IP-FORWARD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, IpAddress, Integer32, Gauge32, Counter32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI RowStatus FROM SNMPv2-TC
从SNMPv2导入模块标识、对象类型、IP地址、整数32、仪表32、计数器32，从SNMPv2导入SMI RowStatus，从SNMPv2 TC导入
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF InterfaceIndexOrZero FROM IF-MIB ip FROM IP-MIB IANAipRouteProtocol FROM IANA-RTPROTO-MIB InetAddress, InetAddressType, InetAddressPrefixLength, InetAutonomousSystemNumber FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB;
模块符合性，SNMPv2 CONF interface中的对象组从ip-MIB中的IF-MIB ip中的索引为零从IANA-RTPROTO-MIB中的IANAipRouteProtocol InetAddress，InetAddressType，InetAddressPrefixLength，INET-ADDRESS-MIB中的InetAutonomousSystemNumber；
ipForward MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "200602010000Z" ORGANIZATION "IETF IPv6 Working Group http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html" CONTACT-INFO "Editor: Brian Haberman Johns Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory Mailstop 17-S442 11100 Johns Hopkins Road Laurel MD, 20723-6099 USA
ipForward MODULE-IDENTITY最后更新的“200602010000Z”组织“IETF IPv6工作组”http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html“联系信息”编辑：布莱恩·哈伯曼·约翰·霍普金斯大学-应用物理实验室邮递站17-S442 11100马里兰州约翰·霍普金斯路劳雷尔，20723-6099
Phone: +1-443-778-1319
Email: brian@innovationslab.net
Phone: +1-443-778-1319
Email: brian@innovationslab.net
Send comments to <ipv6@ietf.org>" DESCRIPTION "The MIB module for the management of CIDR multipath IP Routes.
将评论发送到<ipv6@ietf.org>“说明”用于管理CIDR多路径IP路由的MIB模块。
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This version of this MIB module is a part of RFC 4292; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。此版本的MIB模块是RFC 4292的一部分；有关完整的法律通知，请参见RFC本身。”
REVISION "200602010000Z" DESCRIPTION "IPv4/v6 version-independent revision. Minimal changes were made to the original RFC 2096 MIB to allow easy upgrade of existing IPv4 implementations to the version-independent MIB. These changes include:
修订版“200602010000Z”说明“IPv4/v6版本独立修订版。对原始RFC 2096 MIB进行了最小更改，以允许将现有IPv4实现轻松升级到版本独立MIB。这些更改包括：
Adding inetCidrRouteDiscards as a replacement for the deprecated ipRoutingDiscards and ipv6DiscardedRoutes objects.
添加InetCidErrorEditionDiscards作为不推荐使用的ipRoutingDiscards和ipv6DiscardedRoutes对象的替换。
Adding a new conformance statement to support the implementation of the IP Forwarding MIB in a read-only mode.
添加新的一致性声明以支持以只读模式实现IP转发MIB。
The inetCidrRouteTable replaces the IPv4-specific ipCidrRouteTable, its related objects, and related conformance statements.
inetCidrRouteTable替换IPv4特定的ipCidrRouteTable、其相关对象和相关一致性语句。
Published as RFC 4292."
作为RFC 4292发布。”
REVISION "199609190000Z" DESCRIPTION "Revised to support CIDR routes. Published as RFC 2096."
修订版“199609190000Z”说明“修订以支持CIDR路线。发布为RFC 2096。”
REVISION "199207022156Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 1354."
::= { ip 24 }
REVISION "199207022156Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 1354."
::= { ip 24 }
inetCidrRouteNumber OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of current inetCidrRouteTable entries that
are not invalid."
::= { ipForward 6 }
inetCidrRouteNumber OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of current inetCidrRouteTable entries that
are not invalid."
::= { ipForward 6 }
inetCidrRouteDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of valid route entries discarded from the
inetCidrRouteTable. Discarded route entries do not
appear in the inetCidrRouteTable. One possible reason
for discarding an entry would be to free-up buffer space
for other route table entries."
::= { ipForward 8 }
inetCidrRouteDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of valid route entries discarded from the
inetCidrRouteTable. Discarded route entries do not
appear in the inetCidrRouteTable. One possible reason
for discarding an entry would be to free-up buffer space
for other route table entries."
::= { ipForward 8 }
-- Inet CIDR Route Table
--Inet CIDR路由表
-- The Inet CIDR Route Table deprecates and replaces the
-- ipCidrRoute Table currently in the IP Forwarding Table MIB.
-- It adds IP protocol independence.
-- The Inet CIDR Route Table deprecates and replaces the
-- ipCidrRoute Table currently in the IP Forwarding Table MIB.
-- It adds IP protocol independence.
inetCidrRouteTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF InetCidrRouteEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION
inetCidrRouteTable InetCidrRouteEntry MAX-ACCESS的对象类型语法序列不可访问状态当前描述
"This entity's IP Routing table."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 7 }
"This entity's IP Routing table."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 7 }
inetCidrRouteEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetCidrRouteEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A particular route to a particular destination, under a particular policy (as reflected in the inetCidrRoutePolicy object).
inetCidrRouteEntry对象类型语法inetCidrRouteEntry MAX-ACCESS not ACCESS STATUS当前描述“特定策略下到特定目的地的特定路由（如inetCidrRoutePolicy对象中所反映的）。
Dynamically created rows will survive an agent reboot.
动态创建的行将在代理重新启动后仍然有效。
Implementers need to be aware that if the total number
of elements (octets or sub-identifiers) in
inetCidrRouteDest, inetCidrRoutePolicy, and
inetCidrRouteNextHop exceeds 111, then OIDs of column
instances in this table will have more than 128 sub-
identifiers and cannot be accessed using SNMPv1,
SNMPv2c, or SNMPv3."
INDEX {
inetCidrRouteDestType,
inetCidrRouteDest,
inetCidrRoutePfxLen,
inetCidrRoutePolicy,
inetCidrRouteNextHopType,
inetCidrRouteNextHop
}
::= { inetCidrRouteTable 1 }
Implementers need to be aware that if the total number
of elements (octets or sub-identifiers) in
inetCidrRouteDest, inetCidrRoutePolicy, and
inetCidrRouteNextHop exceeds 111, then OIDs of column
instances in this table will have more than 128 sub-
identifiers and cannot be accessed using SNMPv1,
SNMPv2c, or SNMPv3."
INDEX {
inetCidrRouteDestType,
inetCidrRouteDest,
inetCidrRoutePfxLen,
inetCidrRoutePolicy,
inetCidrRouteNextHopType,
inetCidrRouteNextHop
}
::= { inetCidrRouteTable 1 }
InetCidrRouteEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
inetCidrRouteDestType InetAddressType,
inetCidrRouteDest InetAddress,
inetCidrRoutePfxLen InetAddressPrefixLength,
inetCidrRoutePolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
inetCidrRouteNextHopType InetAddressType,
inetCidrRouteNextHop InetAddress,
inetCidrRouteIfIndex InterfaceIndexOrZero,
inetCidrRouteType INTEGER,
inetCidrRouteProto IANAipRouteProtocol,
inetCidrRouteAge Gauge32,
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS InetAutonomousSystemNumber,
inetCidrRouteMetric1 Integer32,
inetCidrRouteMetric2 Integer32,
inetCidrRouteMetric3 Integer32,
InetCidrRouteEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
inetCidrRouteDestType InetAddressType,
inetCidrRouteDest InetAddress,
inetCidrRoutePfxLen InetAddressPrefixLength,
inetCidrRoutePolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
inetCidrRouteNextHopType InetAddressType,
inetCidrRouteNextHop InetAddress,
inetCidrRouteIfIndex InterfaceIndexOrZero,
inetCidrRouteType INTEGER,
inetCidrRouteProto IANAipRouteProtocol,
inetCidrRouteAge Gauge32,
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS InetAutonomousSystemNumber,
inetCidrRouteMetric1 Integer32,
inetCidrRouteMetric2 Integer32,
inetCidrRouteMetric3 Integer32,
inetCidrRouteMetric4 Integer32, inetCidrRouteMetric5 Integer32, inetCidrRouteStatus RowStatus }
INETCIDRROUTEMETER4整数32，INETCIDRROUTEMETER5整数32，inetCidrRouteStatus RowStatus}
inetCidrRouteDestType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The type of the inetCidrRouteDest address, as defined in the InetAddress MIB.
INETCIDRROUETESTYPE对象类型语法InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS不可访问状态当前描述“INETCIDRROUETEST地址的类型，如InetAddress MIB中定义的。
Only those address types that may appear in an actual
routing table are allowed as values of this object."
REFERENCE "RFC 4001"
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 1 }
Only those address types that may appear in an actual
routing table are allowed as values of this object."
REFERENCE "RFC 4001"
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 1 }
inetCidrRouteDest OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The destination IP address of this route.
INETCIDRROUETEST对象类型语法InetAddress MAX-ACCESS不可访问状态当前描述“此路由的目标IP地址。
The type of this address is determined by the value of the inetCidrRouteDestType object.
此地址的类型由INETCIDRROUITESTYPE对象的值确定。
The values for the index objects inetCidrRouteDest and inetCidrRoutePfxLen must be consistent. When the value of inetCidrRouteDest (excluding the zone index, if one is present) is x, then the bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the mask formed from the corresponding index object inetCidrRoutePfxLen MUST be equal to x. If not, then the index pair is not consistent and an inconsistentName error must be returned on SET or CREATE requests."
索引对象INETCIDRROUETEST和inetCidrRoutePfxLen的值必须一致。当INETCIDRROUETEST的值（不包括区域索引，如果存在区域索引）为x时，x与由相应索引对象inetCidrRoutePfxLen形成的掩码值的位逻辑AND必须等于x。如果不一致，则索引对不一致，必须在SET或CREATE请求上返回不一致的名称错误。“
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 2 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 2 }
inetCidrRoutePfxLen OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressPrefixLength MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Indicates the number of leading one bits that form the mask to be logical-ANDed with the destination address before being compared to the value in the
inetCidrRoutePfxLen对象类型语法InetAddressPrefixLength MAX-ACCESS not accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION”表示在与中的值进行比较之前，形成掩码的前导1位的数量，该掩码将与目标地址逻辑AND
inetCidrRouteDest field.
INETCIDRROUETEST字段。
The values for the index objects inetCidrRouteDest and inetCidrRoutePfxLen must be consistent. When the value of inetCidrRouteDest (excluding the zone index, if one is present) is x, then the bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the mask formed from the corresponding index object inetCidrRoutePfxLen MUST be equal to x. If not, then the index pair is not consistent and an inconsistentName error must be returned on SET or CREATE requests."
索引对象INETCIDRROUETEST和inetCidrRoutePfxLen的值必须一致。当INETCIDRROUETEST的值（不包括区域索引，如果存在区域索引）为x时，x与由相应索引对象inetCidrRoutePfxLen形成的掩码值的位逻辑AND必须等于x。如果不一致，则索引对不一致，必须在SET或CREATE请求上返回不一致的名称错误。“
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 3 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 3 }
inetCidrRoutePolicy OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is an opaque object without any defined
semantics. Its purpose is to serve as an additional
index that may delineate between multiple entries to
the same destination. The value { 0 0 } shall be used
as the default value for this object."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 4 }
inetCidrRoutePolicy OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is an opaque object without any defined
semantics. Its purpose is to serve as an additional
index that may delineate between multiple entries to
the same destination. The value { 0 0 } shall be used
as the default value for this object."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 4 }
inetCidrRouteNextHopType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The type of the inetCidrRouteNextHop address, as defined in the InetAddress MIB.
INETCIDRROTENEXTHOPTYPE对象类型语法InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS不可访问状态当前描述“INETCIDRROTENEXTHOP地址的类型，如InetAddress MIB中定义的。
Value should be set to unknown(0) for non-remote routes.
对于非远程路由，值应设置为未知（0）。
Only those address types that may appear in an actual
routing table are allowed as values of this object."
REFERENCE "RFC 4001"
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 5 }
Only those address types that may appear in an actual
routing table are allowed as values of this object."
REFERENCE "RFC 4001"
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 5 }
inetCidrRouteNextHop OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "On remote routes, the address of the next system en
INETCIDRROTENEXTHOP对象类型语法InetAddress MAX-ACCESS not ACCESS STATUS current DESCRIPTION“在远程路由上，下一个系统的地址
route. For non-remote routes, a zero length string.
路线对于非远程路由，长度为零的字符串。
The type of this address is determined by the value of
the inetCidrRouteNextHopType object."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 6 }
The type of this address is determined by the value of
the inetCidrRouteNextHopType object."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 6 }
inetCidrRouteIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InterfaceIndexOrZero
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached. A value of 0 is valid and represents the
scenario where no interface is specified."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 7 }
inetCidrRouteIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InterfaceIndexOrZero
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached. A value of 0 is valid and represents the
scenario where no interface is specified."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 7 }
inetCidrRouteType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
reject (2), -- route that discards traffic and
-- returns ICMP notification
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4), -- remote destination
blackhole(5) -- route that discards traffic
-- silently
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
inetCidrRouteType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
reject (2), -- route that discards traffic and
-- returns ICMP notification
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4), -- remote destination
blackhole(5) -- route that discards traffic
-- silently
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
Routes that do not result in traffic forwarding or rejection should not be displayed, even if the implementation keeps them stored internally.
不应显示不会导致流量转发或拒绝的路由，即使实现将其存储在内部。
reject(2) refers to a route that, if matched, discards the message as unreachable and returns a notification (e.g., ICMP error) to the message sender. This is used in some protocols as a means of correctly aggregating routes.
拒绝（2）是指一种路由，如果匹配，该路由将丢弃无法访问的消息，并向消息发送者返回通知（例如ICMP错误）。这在某些协议中用作正确聚合路由的方法。
blackhole(5) refers to a route that, if matched,
discards the message silently."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 8 }
blackhole(5) refers to a route that, if matched,
discards the message silently."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 8 }
inetCidrRouteProto OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAipRouteProtocol
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 9 }
inetCidrRouteProto OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAipRouteProtocol
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 9 }
inetCidrRouteAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of 'too old' can be implied, except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 10 }
inetCidrRouteAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of 'too old' can be implied, except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 10 }
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAutonomousSystemNumber
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. The
semantics of this object are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. When this object is unknown or not relevant, its
value should be set to zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 11 }
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAutonomousSystemNumber
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. The
semantics of this object are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. When this object is unknown or not relevant, its
value should be set to zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 11 }
inetCidrRouteMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The primary routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 }
INETCIDROUTEMETRIC1对象类型语法Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read create STATUS current DESCRIPTION“此路由的主要路由度量。此度量的语义由路由的INETCIDROUTEPROTO值中指定的路由协议确定。如果未使用此度量，则其值应设置为-1。”DEFVAL{-1}
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 12 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 12 }
inetCidrRouteMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 13 }
inetCidrRouteMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 13 }
inetCidrRouteMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 14 }
inetCidrRouteMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 14 }
inetCidrRouteMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 15 }
inetCidrRouteMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 15 }
inetCidrRouteMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
inetCidrRouteMetric5对象类型语法Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read create STATUS current DESCRIPTION“此路由的备用路由度量。此度量的语义由路由决定-
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 16 }
protocol specified in the route's inetCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 16 }
inetCidrRouteStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The row status variable, used according to row installation and removal conventions.
inetCidrRouteStatus对象类型语法RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read create STATUS current DESCRIPTION“行状态变量，根据行安装和删除约定使用。
A row entry cannot be modified when the status is
marked as active(1)."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 17 }
A row entry cannot be modified when the status is
marked as active(1)."
::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 17 }
-- Conformance information
--一致性信息
ipForwardConformance
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForward 5 }
ipForwardConformance
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForward 5 }
ipForwardGroups
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForwardConformance 1 }
ipForwardGroups
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForwardConformance 1 }
ipForwardCompliances
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForwardConformance 2 }
ipForwardCompliances
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ipForwardConformance 2 }
-- Compliance statements
--合规声明
ipForwardFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "When this MIB is implemented for read-create, the implementation can claim full compliance.
ipForwardFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION“当此MIB用于读创建时，实现可以声明完全符合。
There are a number of INDEX objects that cannot be represented in the form of OBJECT clauses in SMIv2, but for which there are compliance requirements, expressed in OBJECT clause form in this description:
在SMIv2中，有许多索引对象不能以对象条款的形式表示，但对于这些索引对象，有符合性要求，在本说明中以对象条款的形式表示：
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteDestType
-- SYNTAX InetAddressType (ipv4(1), ipv6(2),
-- ipv4z(3), ipv6z(4))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteDestType
-- SYNTAX InetAddressType (ipv4(1), ipv6(2),
-- ipv4z(3), ipv6z(4))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteDest
-- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (4 | 8 | 16 | 20))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteNextHopType
-- SYNTAX InetAddressType (unknown(0), ipv4(1),
-- ipv6(2), ipv4z(3)
-- ipv6z(4))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteNextHop
-- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (0 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 20))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
"
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteDest
-- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (4 | 8 | 16 | 20))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteNextHopType
-- SYNTAX InetAddressType (unknown(0), ipv4(1),
-- ipv6(2), ipv4z(3)
-- ipv6z(4))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.
--
-- OBJECT inetCidrRouteNextHop
-- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (0 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 20))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
"
MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { inetForwardCidrRouteGroup }
MODULE--此模块为强制组{inetfrowardCidrrouteGroup}
OBJECT inetCidrRouteStatus
SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService (2) }
WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService (2),
createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
DESCRIPTION "Support for createAndWait is not required."
OBJECT inetCidrRouteStatus
SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService (2) }
WRITE-SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1), notInService (2),
createAndGo(4), destroy(6) }
DESCRIPTION "Support for createAndWait is not required."
::= { ipForwardCompliances 3 }
::= { ipForwardCompliances 3 }
ipForwardReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "When this MIB is implemented without support for read-create (i.e., in read-only mode), the implementation can claim read-only compliance." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { inetForwardCidrRouteGroup }
ipForwardReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION“当在不支持读创建的情况下实现此MIB（即，在只读模式下）时，该实现可以声明只读符合性。”模块--此模块是必需的-组{inetForwardCidrRouteGroup}
OBJECT inetCidrRouteIfIndex MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteIfIndex最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteType
对象inetCidrRouteType
MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
MIN-ACCESS只读说明“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteNextHopAS MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象INETCIDRROTENEXTHOPAS最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteMetric1 MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteMetric1最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteMetric2 MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteMetric2最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteMetric3 MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象INETCIDRROUTEMETERIC3最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteMetric4 MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteMetric4最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteMetric5 MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteMetric5最小访问只读描述“不需要写访问。”
OBJECT inetCidrRouteStatus SYNTAX RowStatus { active(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required."
对象inetCidrRouteStatus语法行状态{active（1）}MIN-ACCESS只读说明“不需要写访问。”
::= { ipForwardCompliances 4 }
::= { ipForwardCompliances 4 }
-- units of conformance
--一致性单位
inetForwardCidrRouteGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { inetCidrRouteDiscards, inetCidrRouteIfIndex, inetCidrRouteType, inetCidrRouteProto, inetCidrRouteAge,
INETFORWARD CIDRROUTEGROUP对象组对象{INETCIDRROUTEICARDS，inetCidrRouteIfIndex，inetCidrRouteType，inetCidrRouteProto，inetCidrRouteAge，
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS, inetCidrRouteMetric1,
inetCidrRouteMetric2, inetCidrRouteMetric3,
inetCidrRouteMetric4, inetCidrRouteMetric5,
inetCidrRouteStatus, inetCidrRouteNumber
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IP version-independent CIDR Route Table."
::= { ipForwardGroups 4 }
inetCidrRouteNextHopAS, inetCidrRouteMetric1,
inetCidrRouteMetric2, inetCidrRouteMetric3,
inetCidrRouteMetric4, inetCidrRouteMetric5,
inetCidrRouteStatus, inetCidrRouteNumber
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IP version-independent CIDR Route Table."
::= { ipForwardGroups 4 }
-- Deprecated Objects
--弃用对象
ipCidrRouteNumber OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The number of current ipCidrRouteTable entries that are
not invalid. This object is deprecated in favor of
inetCidrRouteNumber and the inetCidrRouteTable."
::= { ipForward 3 }
ipCidrRouteNumber OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The number of current ipCidrRouteTable entries that are
not invalid. This object is deprecated in favor of
inetCidrRouteNumber and the inetCidrRouteTable."
::= { ipForward 3 }
-- IP CIDR Route Table
--IP CIDR路由表
-- The IP CIDR Route Table obsoletes and replaces the ipRoute
-- Table current in MIB-I and MIB-II and the IP Forwarding Table.
-- It adds knowledge of the autonomous system of the next hop,
-- multiple next hops, policy routing, and Classless
-- Inter-Domain Routing.
-- The IP CIDR Route Table obsoletes and replaces the ipRoute
-- Table current in MIB-I and MIB-II and the IP Forwarding Table.
-- It adds knowledge of the autonomous system of the next hop,
-- multiple next hops, policy routing, and Classless
-- Inter-Domain Routing.
ipCidrRouteTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IpCidrRouteEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"This entity's IP Routing table. This table has been
deprecated in favor of the IP version neutral
inetCidrRouteTable."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 4 }
ipCidrRouteTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IpCidrRouteEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"This entity's IP Routing table. This table has been
deprecated in favor of the IP version neutral
inetCidrRouteTable."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 4 }
ipCidrRouteEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpCidrRouteEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "A particular route to a particular destination, under a
IPCIDROUTENTRY对象类型语法IPCIDROUTENTRY MAX-ACCESS不可访问状态已弃用描述“到特定目的地的特定路由，位于
particular policy."
INDEX {
ipCidrRouteDest,
ipCidrRouteMask,
ipCidrRouteTos,
ipCidrRouteNextHop
}
::= { ipCidrRouteTable 1 }
particular policy."
INDEX {
ipCidrRouteDest,
ipCidrRouteMask,
ipCidrRouteTos,
ipCidrRouteNextHop
}
::= { ipCidrRouteTable 1 }
IpCidrRouteEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
ipCidrRouteDest IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteMask IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteTos Integer32,
ipCidrRouteNextHop IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteIfIndex Integer32,
ipCidrRouteType INTEGER,
ipCidrRouteProto INTEGER,
ipCidrRouteAge Integer32,
ipCidrRouteInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
ipCidrRouteNextHopAS Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric1 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric2 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric3 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric4 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric5 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteStatus RowStatus
}
IpCidrRouteEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
ipCidrRouteDest IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteMask IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteTos Integer32,
ipCidrRouteNextHop IpAddress,
ipCidrRouteIfIndex Integer32,
ipCidrRouteType INTEGER,
ipCidrRouteProto INTEGER,
ipCidrRouteAge Integer32,
ipCidrRouteInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
ipCidrRouteNextHopAS Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric1 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric2 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric3 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric4 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteMetric5 Integer32,
ipCidrRouteStatus RowStatus
}
ipCidrRouteDest OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The destination IP address of this route.
IPCIDROUTEDEST对象类型语法IpAddress MAX-ACCESS只读状态不推荐使用说明“此路由的目标IP地址。
This object may not take a Multicast (Class D) address value.
此对象不能采用多播（类D）地址值。
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipCidrRouteMask object is
not equal to x."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 1 }
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipCidrRouteMask object is
not equal to x."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 1 }
ipCidrRouteMask OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only
IPCIDROUTEMASK对象类型语法IpAddress MAX-ACCESS只读
STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "Indicate the mask to be logical-ANDed with the destination address before being compared to the value in the ipCidrRouteDest field. For those systems that do not support arbitrary subnet masks, an agent constructs the value of the ipCidrRouteMask by reference to the IP Address Class.
STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION“指示在与IPCIDRRoutedTest字段中的值进行比较之前要与目标地址逻辑AND的掩码。对于不支持任意子网掩码的系统，代理通过引用IP地址类来构造IPCIDROUTEMASK的值。
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipCidrRouteDest object is
not equal to ipCidrRouteDest."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 2 }
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipCidrRouteDest object is
not equal to ipCidrRouteDest."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 2 }
-- The following convention is included for specification
-- of TOS Field contents. At this time, the Host Requirements
-- and the Router Requirements documents disagree on the width
-- of the TOS field. This mapping describes the Router
-- Requirements mapping, and leaves room to widen the TOS field
-- without impact to fielded systems.
-- The following convention is included for specification
-- of TOS Field contents. At this time, the Host Requirements
-- and the Router Requirements documents disagree on the width
-- of the TOS field. This mapping describes the Router
-- Requirements mapping, and leaves room to widen the TOS field
-- without impact to fielded systems.
ipCidrRouteTos OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The policy specifier is the IP TOS Field. The encoding of IP TOS is as specified by the following convention. Zero indicates the default path if no more specific policy applies.
IPCIDROUTETOS对象类型语法Integer32（0..2147483647）MAX-ACCESS只读状态不推荐的说明“策略说明符是IP TOS字段。IP TOS的编码由以下约定指定。如果没有应用更具体的策略，则零表示默认路径。
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| | | |
| PRECEDENCE | TYPE OF SERVICE | 0 |
| | | |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| | | |
| PRECEDENCE | TYPE OF SERVICE | 0 |
| | | |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
IP TOS IP TOS
Field Policy Field Policy
Contents Code Contents Code
0 0 0 0 ==> 0 0 0 0 1 ==> 2
0 0 1 0 ==> 4 0 0 1 1 ==> 6
0 1 0 0 ==> 8 0 1 0 1 ==> 10
0 1 1 0 ==> 12 0 1 1 1 ==> 14
1 0 0 0 ==> 16 1 0 0 1 ==> 18
1 0 1 0 ==> 20 1 0 1 1 ==> 22
IP TOS IP TOS
Field Policy Field Policy
Contents Code Contents Code
0 0 0 0 ==> 0 0 0 0 1 ==> 2
0 0 1 0 ==> 4 0 0 1 1 ==> 6
0 1 0 0 ==> 8 0 1 0 1 ==> 10
0 1 1 0 ==> 12 0 1 1 1 ==> 14
1 0 0 0 ==> 16 1 0 0 1 ==> 18
1 0 1 0 ==> 20 1 0 1 1 ==> 22
1 1 0 0 ==> 24 1 1 0 1 ==> 26
1 1 1 0 ==> 28 1 1 1 1 ==> 30"
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 3 }
1 1 0 0 ==> 24 1 1 0 1 ==> 26
1 1 1 0 ==> 28 1 1 1 1 ==> 30"
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 3 }
ipCidrRouteNextHop OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IpAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"On remote routes, the address of the next system en
route; Otherwise, 0.0.0.0."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 4 }
ipCidrRouteNextHop OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IpAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"On remote routes, the address of the next system en
route; Otherwise, 0.0.0.0."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 4 }
ipCidrRouteIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 5 }
ipCidrRouteIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 5 }
ipCidrRouteType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
reject (2), -- route that discards traffic
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4) -- remote destination
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
ipCidrRouteType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
reject (2), -- route that discards traffic
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4) -- remote destination
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
Routes that do not result in traffic forwarding or rejection should not be displayed, even if the implementation keeps them stored internally.
不应显示不会导致流量转发或拒绝的路由，即使实现将其存储在内部。
reject (2) refers to a route that, if matched,
discards the message as unreachable. This is used in
some protocols as a means of correctly aggregating
routes."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 6 }
reject (2) refers to a route that, if matched,
discards the message as unreachable. This is used in
some protocols as a means of correctly aggregating
routes."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 6 }
ipCidrRouteProto OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { other (1), -- not specified local (2), -- local interface netmgmt (3), -- static route icmp (4), -- result of ICMP Redirect
IPCIDROUTEPROTO对象类型语法整数{other（1），--未指定本地（2），--本地接口netmgmt（3），--静态路由icmp（4），--icmp重定向的结果
-- the following are all dynamic
-- routing protocols
egp (5), -- Exterior Gateway Protocol
ggp (6), -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol
hello (7), -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak
rip (8), -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II
isIs (9), -- Dual IS-IS
esIs (10), -- ISO 9542
ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP
bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP
ospf (13), -- Open Shortest Path First
bgp (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol
idpr (15), -- InterDomain Policy Routing
ciscoEigrp (16) -- Cisco EIGRP
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 7 }
-- the following are all dynamic
-- routing protocols
egp (5), -- Exterior Gateway Protocol
ggp (6), -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol
hello (7), -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak
rip (8), -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II
isIs (9), -- Dual IS-IS
esIs (10), -- ISO 9542
ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP
bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP
ospf (13), -- Open Shortest Path First
bgp (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol
idpr (15), -- InterDomain Policy Routing
ciscoEigrp (16) -- Cisco EIGRP
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 7 }
ipCidrRouteAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of `too old' can be implied, except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 8 }
ipCidrRouteAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of `too old' can be implied, except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 8 }
ipCidrRouteInfo OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER MAX-ACCESS read-create
IPCIDROUTEINFO对象类型语法对象标识符MAX-ACCESS read create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"A reference to MIB definitions specific to the
particular routing protocol that is responsible for
this route, as determined by the value specified in the
route's ipCidrRouteProto value. If this information is
not present, its value should be set to the OBJECT
IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid
object identifier, and any implementation conforming to
ASN.1 and the Basic Encoding Rules must be able to
generate and recognize this value."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 9 }
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"A reference to MIB definitions specific to the
particular routing protocol that is responsible for
this route, as determined by the value specified in the
route's ipCidrRouteProto value. If this information is
not present, its value should be set to the OBJECT
IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid
object identifier, and any implementation conforming to
ASN.1 and the Basic Encoding Rules must be able to
generate and recognize this value."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 9 }
ipCidrRouteNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. The
semantics of this object are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. When this object is unknown or not relevant, its
value should be set to zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 10 }
ipCidrRouteNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. The
semantics of this object are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. When this object is unknown or not relevant, its
value should be set to zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 10 }
ipCidrRouteMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The primary routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 11 }
ipCidrRouteMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"The primary routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 11 }
ipCidrRouteMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
IPCIDROUTEMETRIC2对象类型语法Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read create STATUS不推荐的描述“此路由的备用路由度量。此度量的语义由路由的IPCIDROUTEPROTO值中指定的路由协议确定。如果未使用此度量，则其值应为
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 12 }
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 12 }
ipCidrRouteMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 13 }
ipCidrRouteMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 13 }
ipCidrRouteMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 14 }
ipCidrRouteMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 14 }
ipCidrRouteMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 15 }
ipCidrRouteMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS deprecated
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipCidrRouteProto
value. If this metric is not used, its value should be
set to -1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 15 }
ipCidrRouteStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION
IPCIDROUTESTATUS对象类型语法RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read create STATUS弃用说明
"The row status variable, used according to row
installation and removal conventions."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 16 }
"The row status variable, used according to row
installation and removal conventions."
::= { ipCidrRouteEntry 16 }
-- compliance statements
--合规声明
ipForwardCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities that implement the ipForward MIB.
ipForwardCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS弃用描述“实现ipForward MIB的SNMPv2实体的符合性声明。
This compliance statement has been deprecated and replaced with ipForwardFullCompliance and ipForwardReadOnlyCompliance."
此合规性声明已被弃用，并替换为ipForwardFullCompliance和ipForwardReadOnlyCompliance。“
MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { ipForwardCidrRouteGroup }
MODULE--此模块为强制组{IPForwardCidrOutegroup}
::= { ipForwardCompliances 1 }
::= { ipForwardCompliances 1 }
-- units of conformance
--一致性单位
ipForwardCidrRouteGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { ipCidrRouteNumber, ipCidrRouteDest, ipCidrRouteMask, ipCidrRouteTos, ipCidrRouteNextHop, ipCidrRouteIfIndex, ipCidrRouteType, ipCidrRouteProto, ipCidrRouteAge, ipCidrRouteInfo,ipCidrRouteNextHopAS, ipCidrRouteMetric1, ipCidrRouteMetric2, ipCidrRouteMetric3, ipCidrRouteMetric4, ipCidrRouteMetric5, ipCidrRouteStatus } STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The CIDR Route Table.
ipForwardCidrRouteGroup对象组对象{IPCIDROUTENUMBER、IPCIDROUTEDEST、IPCIDROUTEMASK、IPCIDROUTETOS、IPCIDROUTENEXTHOP、IPCIDROUTEFINDEX、IPCIDROUTETYPE、IPCIDROUTEPROTO、IPCIDROUTEAGE、IPCIDROUTEINFO、IPCIDROUTENEXTHOPAS、IPCIDROUTEMETRIC1、IPCIDROUTEMETRIC2、IPCIDROUTEMETRIC4、IPCIDROUTEMETRIC5、IPCIDROUTESTATUS}}CIDR路由表中的状态“已弃用说明”。
This group has been deprecated and replaced with
inetForwardCidrRouteGroup."
::= { ipForwardGroups 3 }
This group has been deprecated and replaced with
inetForwardCidrRouteGroup."
::= { ipForwardGroups 3 }
-- Obsoleted Definitions - Objects
--过时的定义-对象
ipForwardNumber OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Gauge32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION
ipForwardNumber对象类型语法量表32 MAX-ACCESS只读状态过时说明
"The number of current ipForwardTable entries that are
not invalid."
::= { ipForward 1 }
"The number of current ipForwardTable entries that are
not invalid."
::= { ipForward 1 }
-- IP Forwarding Table
--IP转发表
-- The IP Forwarding Table obsoletes and replaces the ipRoute
-- Table current in MIB-I and MIB-II. It adds knowledge of
-- the autonomous system of the next hop, multiple next hop
-- support, and policy routing support.
-- The IP Forwarding Table obsoletes and replaces the ipRoute
-- Table current in MIB-I and MIB-II. It adds knowledge of
-- the autonomous system of the next hop, multiple next hop
-- support, and policy routing support.
ipForwardTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IpForwardEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"This entity's IP Routing table."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 2 }
ipForwardTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IpForwardEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"This entity's IP Routing table."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1213 Section 6.6, The IP Group"
::= { ipForward 2 }
ipForwardEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IpForwardEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"A particular route to a particular destination, under a
particular policy."
INDEX {
ipForwardDest,
ipForwardProto,
ipForwardPolicy,
ipForwardNextHop
}
::= { ipForwardTable 1 }
ipForwardEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IpForwardEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"A particular route to a particular destination, under a
particular policy."
INDEX {
ipForwardDest,
ipForwardProto,
ipForwardPolicy,
ipForwardNextHop
}
::= { ipForwardTable 1 }
IpForwardEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
ipForwardDest IpAddress,
ipForwardMask IpAddress,
ipForwardPolicy Integer32,
ipForwardNextHop IpAddress,
ipForwardIfIndex Integer32,
ipForwardType INTEGER,
ipForwardProto INTEGER,
ipForwardAge Integer32,
ipForwardInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
ipForwardNextHopAS Integer32,
ipForwardMetric1 Integer32,
IpForwardEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
ipForwardDest IpAddress,
ipForwardMask IpAddress,
ipForwardPolicy Integer32,
ipForwardNextHop IpAddress,
ipForwardIfIndex Integer32,
ipForwardType INTEGER,
ipForwardProto INTEGER,
ipForwardAge Integer32,
ipForwardInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
ipForwardNextHopAS Integer32,
ipForwardMetric1 Integer32,
ipForwardMetric2 Integer32, ipForwardMetric3 Integer32, ipForwardMetric4 Integer32, ipForwardMetric5 Integer32 }
ipForwardMetric2整数32、ipForwardMetric3整数32、ipForwardMetric4整数32、ipForwardMetric5整数32}
ipForwardDest OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The destination IP address of this route. An entry with a value of 0.0.0.0 is considered a default route.
ipForwardDest对象类型语法IpAddress MAX-ACCESS只读状态过时描述“此路由的目标IP地址。值为0.0.0.0的条目被视为默认路由。
This object may not take a Multicast (Class D) address value.
此对象不能采用多播（类D）地址值。
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipForwardMask object is
not equal to x."
::= { ipForwardEntry 1 }
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipForwardMask object is
not equal to x."
::= { ipForwardEntry 1 }
ipForwardMask OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpAddress MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "Indicate the mask to be logical-ANDed with the destination address before being compared to the value in the ipForwardDest field. For those systems that do not support arbitrary subnet masks, an agent constructs the value of the ipForwardMask by reference to the IP Address Class.
ipForwardMask对象类型语法IpAddress MAX-ACCESS读取创建状态过时说明“在与ipForwardDest字段中的值进行比较之前，指示要与目标地址逻辑AND的掩码。对于不支持任意子网掩码的系统，代理通过引用IP地址类来构造ipForwardMask的值。
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipForwardDest object is
not equal to ipForwardDest."
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { ipForwardEntry 2 }
Any assignment (implicit or otherwise) of an instance
of this object to a value x must be rejected if the
bitwise logical-AND of x with the value of the
corresponding instance of the ipForwardDest object is
not equal to ipForwardDest."
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { ipForwardEntry 2 }
-- The following convention is included for specification
-- of TOS Field contents. At this time, the Host Requirements
-- and the Router Requirements documents disagree on the width
-- of the TOS field. This mapping describes the Router
-- The following convention is included for specification
-- of TOS Field contents. At this time, the Host Requirements
-- and the Router Requirements documents disagree on the width
-- of the TOS field. This mapping describes the Router
-- Requirements mapping, and leaves room to widen the TOS field
-- without impact to fielded systems.
-- Requirements mapping, and leaves room to widen the TOS field
-- without impact to fielded systems.
ipForwardPolicy OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The general set of conditions that would cause the selection of one multipath route (set of next hops for a given destination) is referred to as 'policy'.
ipForwardPolicy对象类型语法整数32（0..2147483647）MAX-ACCESS只读状态过时说明“导致选择一条多路径路由（给定目的地的下一跳集）的一般条件集称为“策略”。
Unless the mechanism indicated by ipForwardProto specifies otherwise, the policy specifier is the IP TOS Field. The encoding of IP TOS is as specified by the following convention. Zero indicates the default path if no more specific policy applies.
除非ipForwardProto指示的机制另有规定，否则策略说明符是IP TOS字段。IP TOS的编码由以下约定指定。如果没有应用更具体的策略，则零表示默认路径。
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| | | |
| PRECEDENCE | TYPE OF SERVICE | 0 |
| | | |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| | | |
| PRECEDENCE | TYPE OF SERVICE | 0 |
| | | |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
IP TOS IP TOS
Field Policy Field Policy
Contents Code Contents Code
0 0 0 0 ==> 0 0 0 0 1 ==> 2
0 0 1 0 ==> 4 0 0 1 1 ==> 6
0 1 0 0 ==> 8 0 1 0 1 ==> 10
0 1 1 0 ==> 12 0 1 1 1 ==> 14
1 0 0 0 ==> 16 1 0 0 1 ==> 18
1 0 1 0 ==> 20 1 0 1 1 ==> 22
1 1 0 0 ==> 24 1 1 0 1 ==> 26
1 1 1 0 ==> 28 1 1 1 1 ==> 30
IP TOS IP TOS
Field Policy Field Policy
Contents Code Contents Code
0 0 0 0 ==> 0 0 0 0 1 ==> 2
0 0 1 0 ==> 4 0 0 1 1 ==> 6
0 1 0 0 ==> 8 0 1 0 1 ==> 10
0 1 1 0 ==> 12 0 1 1 1 ==> 14
1 0 0 0 ==> 16 1 0 0 1 ==> 18
1 0 1 0 ==> 20 1 0 1 1 ==> 22
1 1 0 0 ==> 24 1 1 0 1 ==> 26
1 1 1 0 ==> 28 1 1 1 1 ==> 30
Protocols defining 'policy' otherwise must either
define a set of values that are valid for
this object or must implement an integer-instanced
policy table for which this object's
value acts as an index."
::= { ipForwardEntry 3 }
Protocols defining 'policy' otherwise must either
define a set of values that are valid for
this object or must implement an integer-instanced
policy table for which this object's
value acts as an index."
::= { ipForwardEntry 3 }
ipForwardNextHop OBJECT-TYPE
ipForwardNextHop对象类型
SYNTAX IpAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"On remote routes, the address of the next system en
route; otherwise, 0.0.0.0."
::= { ipForwardEntry 4 }
SYNTAX IpAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"On remote routes, the address of the next system en
route; otherwise, 0.0.0.0."
::= { ipForwardEntry 4 }
ipForwardIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 5 }
ipForwardIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The ifIndex value that identifies the local interface
through which the next hop of this route should be
reached."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 5 }
ipForwardType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
invalid (2), -- logically deleted
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4) -- remote destination
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
ipForwardType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other (1), -- not specified by this MIB
invalid (2), -- logically deleted
local (3), -- local interface
remote (4) -- remote destination
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a
route for which the next hop is the final destination;
remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is
not the final destination.
Setting this object to the value invalid(2) has the
effect of invalidating the corresponding entry in the
ipForwardTable object. That is, it effectively
disassociates the destination identified with said
entry from the route identified with said entry. It is
an implementation-specific matter as to whether the
agent removes an invalidated entry from the table.
Accordingly, management stations must be prepared to
receive tabular information from agents that
corresponds to entries not currently in use. Proper
interpretation of such entries requires examination of
the relevant ipForwardType object."
DEFVAL { invalid }
::= { ipForwardEntry 6 }
Setting this object to the value invalid(2) has the
effect of invalidating the corresponding entry in the
ipForwardTable object. That is, it effectively
disassociates the destination identified with said
entry from the route identified with said entry. It is
an implementation-specific matter as to whether the
agent removes an invalidated entry from the table.
Accordingly, management stations must be prepared to
receive tabular information from agents that
corresponds to entries not currently in use. Proper
interpretation of such entries requires examination of
the relevant ipForwardType object."
DEFVAL { invalid }
::= { ipForwardEntry 6 }
ipForwardProto OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { other (1), -- not specified local (2), -- local interface netmgmt (3), -- static route icmp (4), -- result of ICMP Redirect
ipForwardProto对象类型语法整数{other（1），--未指定本地（2），--本地接口netmgmt（3），--静态路由icmp（4），--icmp重定向的结果
-- the following are all dynamic
-- routing protocols
egp (5), -- Exterior Gateway Protocol
ggp (6), -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol
hello (7), -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak
rip (8), -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II
is-is (9), -- Dual IS-IS
es-is (10), -- ISO 9542
ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP
bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP
ospf (13), -- Open Shortest Path First
bgp (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol
idpr (15) -- InterDomain Policy Routing
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { ipForwardEntry 7 }
-- the following are all dynamic
-- routing protocols
egp (5), -- Exterior Gateway Protocol
ggp (6), -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol
hello (7), -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak
rip (8), -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II
is-is (9), -- Dual IS-IS
es-is (10), -- ISO 9542
ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP
bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP
ospf (13), -- Open Shortest Path First
bgp (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol
idpr (15) -- InterDomain Policy Routing
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The routing mechanism via which this route was learned.
Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is
not intended to imply that hosts should support those
protocols."
::= { ipForwardEntry 7 }
ipForwardAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of `too old' can be implied except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 8 }
ipForwardAge OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds since this route was last updated
or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no
semantics of `too old' can be implied except through
knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route
was learned."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 8 }
ipForwardInfo OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete
ipForwardInfo对象类型语法对象标识符MAX-ACCESS读取创建状态已过时
DESCRIPTION
"A reference to MIB definitions specific to the
particular routing protocol that is responsible for
this route, as determined by the value specified in the
route's ipForwardProto value. If this information is
not present, its value should be set to the OBJECT
IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid
object identifier, and any implementation conforming to
ASN.1 and the Basic Encoding Rules must be able to
generate and recognize this value."
::= { ipForwardEntry 9 }
DESCRIPTION
"A reference to MIB definitions specific to the
particular routing protocol that is responsible for
this route, as determined by the value specified in the
route's ipForwardProto value. If this information is
not present, its value should be set to the OBJECT
IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid
object identifier, and any implementation conforming to
ASN.1 and the Basic Encoding Rules must be able to
generate and recognize this value."
::= { ipForwardEntry 9 }
ipForwardNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. When
this is unknown or not relevant to the protocol
indicated by ipForwardProto, zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 10 }
ipForwardNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. When
this is unknown or not relevant to the protocol
indicated by ipForwardProto, zero."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 10 }
ipForwardMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The primary routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 11 }
ipForwardMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"The primary routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 11 }
ipForwardMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 12 }
ipForwardMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 12 }
ipForwardMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 13 }
ipForwardMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 13 }
ipForwardMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 14 }
ipForwardMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 14 }
ipForwardMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 15 }
ipForwardMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"An alternate routing metric for this route. The
semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-
protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value.
If this metric is not used, its value should be set to
-1."
DEFVAL { -1 }
::= { ipForwardEntry 15 }
-- Obsoleted Definitions - Groups
-- compliance statements
-- Obsoleted Definitions - Groups
-- compliance statements
ipForwardOldCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement the ipForward MIB."
ipForwardOldCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS Obsteed DESCRIPTION“实现ipForward MIB的SNMP实体的符合性声明。”
MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { ipForwardMultiPathGroup }
MODULE--此模块是强制的-GROUPS{ipForwardMultiPathGroup}
::= { ipForwardCompliances 2 }
::= { ipForwardCompliances 2 }
ipForwardMultiPathGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { ipForwardNumber,
ipForwardDest, ipForwardMask, ipForwardPolicy,
ipForwardNextHop, ipForwardIfIndex, ipForwardType,
ipForwardProto, ipForwardAge, ipForwardInfo,
ipForwardNextHopAS,
ipForwardMetric1, ipForwardMetric2, ipForwardMetric3,
ipForwardMetric4, ipForwardMetric5
}
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"IP Multipath Route Table."
::= { ipForwardGroups 2 }
ipForwardMultiPathGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { ipForwardNumber,
ipForwardDest, ipForwardMask, ipForwardPolicy,
ipForwardNextHop, ipForwardIfIndex, ipForwardType,
ipForwardProto, ipForwardAge, ipForwardInfo,
ipForwardNextHopAS,
ipForwardMetric1, ipForwardMetric2, ipForwardMetric3,
ipForwardMetric4, ipForwardMetric5
}
STATUS obsolete
DESCRIPTION
"IP Multipath Route Table."
::= { ipForwardGroups 2 }
END
终止
There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB module with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
此MIB模块中定义了许多管理对象，其MAX-ACCESS子句为read-write和/或read-create。在某些网络环境中，此类对象可能被视为敏感或易受攻击。在没有适当保护的非安全环境中支持SET操作可能会对网络操作产生负面影响。以下是表和对象及其敏感度/漏洞：
1. The inetCidrRouteTable contains routing and forwarding information that is critical to the operation of the network node (especially routers). Allowing unauthenticated write access to this table can compromise the validity of the forwarding information.
1. inetCidrRouteTable包含对网络节点（尤其是路由器）的操作至关重要的路由和转发信息。允许对此表进行未经验证的写访问可能会影响转发信息的有效性。
Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
在某些网络环境中，此MIB模块中的某些可读对象（即具有MAX-ACCESS而非not ACCESS的对象）可能被视为敏感或易受攻击。因此，在通过SNMP通过网络发送这些对象时，控制甚至获取和/或通知对这些对象的访问，甚至可能加密这些对象的值，这一点非常重要。以下是表和对象及其敏感度/漏洞：
1. The inetCidrRouteTable contains routing and forwarding information that can be used to compromise a network.
1. inetCidrRouteTable包含可用于破坏网络的路由和转发信息。
Specifically, this table can be used to construct a map of the network in preparation for a denial-of-service attack on the network infrastructure.
具体而言，此表可用于构建网络地图，为网络基础设施上的拒绝服务攻击做好准备。
2. The inetCidrRouteProto object identifies the routing protocols in use within a network. This information can be used to determine how a denial-of-service attack should be launched.
2. inetCidrRouteProto对象标识网络中使用的路由协议。此信息可用于确定应如何发起拒绝服务攻击。
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module.
SNMPv3之前的SNMP版本未包含足够的安全性。即使网络本身是安全的（例如通过使用IPSec），即使如此，也无法控制安全网络上的谁可以访问和获取/设置（读取/更改/创建/删除）此MIB模块中的对象。
It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy).
建议实施者考虑SNMPv3框架所提供的安全特性（参见[RCFC310]，第8节），包括对SNMPv3加密机制的完全支持（用于身份验证和隐私）。
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
此外，不建议部署SNMPv3之前的SNMP版本。相反，建议部署SNMPv3并启用加密安全性。然后，客户/运营商应负责确保授予访问此MIB模块实例权限的SNMP实体已正确配置为仅授予那些拥有确实获取或设置（更改/创建/删除）对象的合法权限的主体（用户）访问对象。
This document obsoletes RFC 2096 in the following ways:
本文件通过以下方式淘汰RFC 2096：
1. Replaces ipCidrRouteTable with inetCidrRouteTable. This applies to corresponding objects and conformance statements.
1. 将ipCidrRouteTable替换为inetCidrRouteTable。这适用于相应的对象和一致性声明。
2. Utilizes the InetAddress TC to support IP version-independent implementations of the forwarding MIB. This gives common forwarding MIB support for IPv4 and IPv6.
2. 利用InetAddress TC支持转发MIB的独立于IP版本的实现。这为IPv4和IPv6提供了公共转发MIB支持。
3. Creates a read-only conformance statement to support implementations that only wish to retrieve data.
3. 创建只读一致性语句以支持只希望检索数据的实现。
4. Creates the inetCidrRouteDiscards object to replace the deprecated ipRoutingDiscards and ipv6DiscardedRoutes objects.
4. 创建inetCidrRouteDiscards对象以替换不推荐的ipRoutingDiscards和ipv6DiscardedRoutes对象。
The inetCidrRouteTable retains the logical structure of the ipCidrRouteTable in order to allow the easy upgrade of existing IPv4 implementations to the version-independent MIB.
inetCidrRouteTable保留了ipcidroutetable的逻辑结构，以便将现有IPv4实现轻松升级到独立于版本的MIB。
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2119]Bradner，S.，“RFC中用于表示需求水平的关键词”，BCP 14，RFC 2119，1997年3月。
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2578]McCloghrie，K.，Perkins，D.，和J.Schoenwaeld，“管理信息的结构版本2（SMIv2）”，STD 58，RFC 2578，1999年4月。
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2579]McCloghrie，K.，Perkins，D.，和J.Schoenwaeld，“SMIv2的文本约定”，STD 58，RFC 2579，1999年4月。
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
[RFC2580]McCloghrie，K.，Perkins，D.，和J.Schoenwaeld，“SMIv2的一致性声明”，STD 58，RFC 25801999年4月。
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
[RFC2863]McCloghrie，K.和F.Kastenholz，“接口组MIB”，RFC 28632000年6月。
[RFC4001] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses", RFC 4001, February 2005.
[RFC4001]Daniele，M.，Haberman，B.，Routhier，S.，和J.Schoenwaeld，“互联网网络地址的文本约定”，RFC 4001，2005年2月。
[RFC4293] Routhier, S., Ed., "Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP), RFC 4293, April 2006.
[RFC4293]Routhier，S.，Ed.，互联网协议（IP）管理信息库，RFC4293，2006年4月。
[RTPROTO] IANA, "IP Route Protocol MIB", http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiprouteprotocol-mib, September 2000.
[RTPROTO]IANA，“IP路由协议MIB”，http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiprouteprotocol-mib，2000年9月。
[RFC1213] McCloghrie, K. and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-II", RFC 1213, March 1991.
[RFC1213]McCloghrie，K.和M.Rose，“基于TCP/IP的互联网网络管理的管理信息库：MIB-II”，RFC 1213，1991年3月。
[RFC1354] Baker, F., "IP Forwarding Table MIB", RFC 1354, July 1992.
[RFC1354]Baker，F.，“IP转发表MIB”，RFC1354，1992年7月。
[RFC2011] McCloghrie, K., Editor, "SNMPv2 Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol using SMIv2", RFC 2011, November 1996.
[RFC2011]McCloghrie，K.，编辑，“使用SMIv2的互联网协议SNMPv2管理信息库”，RFC 2011，1996年11月。
[RFC2096] Baker, F., "IP Forwarding Table MIB", RFC 2096, January 1997.
[RFC2096]Baker，F.，“IP转发表MIB”，RFC 2096，1997年1月。
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
[RFC3410]Case，J.，Mundy，R.，Partain，D.，和B.Stewart，“互联网标准管理框架的介绍和适用性声明”，RFC 34102002年12月。
[RFC2465] Haskin, D. and S. Onishi, Management Information Base for IP Version 6: Textual Conventions and General Group", RFC 2465, December 1998.
[RFC2465]Haskin，D.和S.Onishi，IP版本6的管理信息库：文本约定和一般组”，RFC 2465，1998年12月。
This document was based on RFC 2096 [RFC2096].
本文件基于RFC 2096[RFC2096]。
The following people provided text for this version of the document, or were authors of previous versions:
以下人员提供了此版本文档的文本，或是以前版本的作者：
Fred Baker, Cisco Bill Fenner, AT&T Research Brian Haberman, Johns Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory Juergen Schoenwalder, TU Braunschweig Dave Thaler, Microsoft Margaret Wasserman, Thingmagic
弗雷德·贝克、思科公司比尔·芬纳、美国电话电报公司研究部布莱恩·哈伯曼、约翰·霍普金斯大学应用物理实验室于尔根·舍恩瓦尔德、图布伦瑞克威格·戴夫·泰勒、微软公司玛格丽特·沃瑟曼、Thingmagic
Dario Accornero, Mark Adam, Qing Li, and Shawn Routhier reviewed the document and provided helpful feedback.
Dario Accornero、Mark Adam、Qing Li和Shawn Routhier审查了该文件并提供了有用的反馈。
Mike Heard provided valuable feedback as the MIB Doctor for this document.
Mike Heard作为MIB医生为这份文件提供了宝贵的反馈。
Editors' Contact Information
编辑联系方式
Comments or questions regarding this document should be sent to:
有关本文件的意见或问题应发送至：
Brian Haberman Johns Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory Mailstop 17-S442 11100 Johns Hopkins Road Laurel MD, 20723-6099 USA
布莱恩·哈伯曼·约翰·霍普金斯大学-应用物理实验室邮递站17-S442 11100马里兰州约翰·霍普金斯路劳雷尔，20723-6099
Phone: +1-443-778-1319
EMail: brian@innovationslab.net
Phone: +1-443-778-1319
EMail: brian@innovationslab.net
Full Copyright Statement
完整版权声明
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
本文件受BCP 78中包含的权利、许可和限制的约束，除其中规定外，作者保留其所有权利。
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
本文件及其包含的信息是按“原样”提供的，贡献者、他/她所代表或赞助的组织（如有）、互联网协会和互联网工程任务组不承担任何明示或暗示的担保，包括但不限于任何保证，即使用本文中的信息不会侵犯任何权利，或对适销性或特定用途适用性的任何默示保证。
Intellectual Property
知识产权
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
IETF对可能声称与本文件所述技术的实施或使用有关的任何知识产权或其他权利的有效性或范围，或此类权利下的任何许可可能或可能不可用的程度，不采取任何立场；它也不表示它已作出任何独立努力来确定任何此类权利。有关RFC文件中权利的程序信息，请参见BCP 78和BCP 79。
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
向IETF秘书处披露的知识产权副本和任何许可证保证，或本规范实施者或用户试图获得使用此类专有权利的一般许可证或许可的结果，可从IETF在线知识产权存储库获取，网址为http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
IETF邀请任何相关方提请其注意任何版权、专利或专利申请，或其他可能涵盖实施本标准所需技术的专有权利。请将信息发送至IETF的IETF-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
确认
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
RFC编辑器功能的资金由IETF行政支持活动（IASA）提供。