Network Working Group S. Hares
Request for Comments: 4276 NextHop
Category: Informational A. Retana
Cisco
January 2006
Network Working Group S. Hares
Request for Comments: 4276 NextHop
Category: Informational A. Retana
Cisco
January 2006
BGP-4 Implementation Report
BGP-4实施报告
Status of This Memo
关于下段备忘
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
本备忘录为互联网社区提供信息。它没有规定任何类型的互联网标准。本备忘录的分发不受限制。
Copyright Notice
版权公告
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
Abstract
摘要
This document reports the results of the BGP-4 implementation survey. The survey had 259 questions about implementations' support of BGP-4 as specified in RFC 4271. After a brief summary of the results, each response is listed. This document contains responses from the four implementers that completed the survey (Alcatel, Cisco, Laurel, and NextHop) and brief information from three that did not (Avici, Data Connection Ltd., and Nokia).
本文件报告了BGP-4实施调查的结果。这项调查有259个关于RFC 4271中规定的BGP-4实施支持的问题。在简要总结结果后，将列出每个响应。本文档包含完成调查的四个实施者（阿尔卡特、思科、劳雷尔和NextHop）的回复，以及三个未完成调查的实施者（Avici、数据连接有限公司和诺基亚）的简要信息。
The editors did not use exterior means to verify the accuracy of the information submitted by the respondents. The respondents are experts with the products they reported on.
编辑没有使用外部手段来验证受访者提交的信息的准确性。受访者是他们所报告产品的专家。
Table of Contents
目录
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................4
2. Results of Survey ...............................................4
2.1. Significant Differences ....................................4
2.2. Overview of Differences ....................................5
2.3. Implementations and Interoperability .......................6
2.4. BGP Implementation Identification ..........................7
3. BGP-4 Implementation Report .....................................7
3.0. Summary of Operation / Section 3 [RFC4271] .................7
3.1. Routes: Advertisement and Storage / Section 3.1 [RFC4271] ..8
3.2. Routing Information Bases / Section 3.2 [RFC4271] ..........9
3.3. Message Formats / Section 4 [RFC4271] ......................9
3.4. Message Header Format / Section 4.1 [RFC4271] .............10
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document ..........................4
2. Results of Survey ...............................................4
2.1. Significant Differences ....................................4
2.2. Overview of Differences ....................................5
2.3. Implementations and Interoperability .......................6
2.4. BGP Implementation Identification ..........................7
3. BGP-4 Implementation Report .....................................7
3.0. Summary of Operation / Section 3 [RFC4271] .................7
3.1. Routes: Advertisement and Storage / Section 3.1 [RFC4271] ..8
3.2. Routing Information Bases / Section 3.2 [RFC4271] ..........9
3.3. Message Formats / Section 4 [RFC4271] ......................9
3.4. Message Header Format / Section 4.1 [RFC4271] .............10
3.5. OPEN Message / Section 4.2 [RFC4271] ......................11
3.6. UPDATE Message Format / Section 4.3 [RFC4271] .............12
3.7. KEEPALIVE Message Format / Section 4.4 [RFC4271] ..........16
3.8. NOTIFICATION Message Format / Section 4.5 [RFC4271] .......17
3.9. Path Attributes /Section 5 [RFC4271] ......................17
3.10. ORIGIN / Section 5.1.1 [RFC4271] .........................22
3.11. AS_PATH / Section 5.1.2 [RFC4271] ........................22
3.12. NEXT_HOP / Section 5.1.3 [RFC4271] .......................23
3.13. MULTI_EXIT_DISC / Section 5.1.4 [RFC4271] ................27
3.14. LOCAL_PREF / Section 5.1.5 [RFC4271] .....................30
3.15. ATOMIC_AGGREGATE / Section 5.1.6 [RFC4271] ...............31
3.16. AGGREGATOR / Section 5.1.7 [RFC4271] .....................32
3.17. BGP Error Handling / Section 6 [RFC4271] .................34
3.18. Message Header Error Handling / Section 6.1 [RFC4271] ....34
3.19. OPEN Message Error Handling / Section 6.2 [RFC4271] ......36
3.20. UPDATE Message Error Handling / Section 6.3 [RFC4271] ....40
3.21. NOTIFICATION Message Error Handling / Section 6.4
[RFC4271] ................................................50
3.22. Hold Timer Expired Error Handling / Section 6.5
[RFC4271] ................................................51
3.23. Finite State Machine Error Handling / Section 6.6
[RFC4271] ................................................51
3.24. Cease / Section 6.7 [RFC4271] ............................51
3.25. BGP Connection Collision Detection / Section 6.8
[RFC4271] ................................................53
3.26. BGP Version Negotiation / Section 7 [RFC4271] ............54
3.27. BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) / Section 8 [RFC4271] .....55
3.28. Administrative Events / Section 8.1.2 [RFC4271] ..........55
3.29. Timer Events / Section 8.1.3 [RFC4271] ...................61
3.30. TCP Connection-Based Events / Section 8.1.4 [RFC4271] ....62
3.31. BGP Messages-Based Events / Section 8.1.5 [RFC4271] ......63
3.32. FSM Definition / Section 8.2.1 [RFC4271] .................65
3.33. FSM and Collision Detection / Section 8.2.1.2 [RFC4271] ..66
3.34. FSM Event numbers / Section 8.2.1.4 [RFC4271] ............66
3.35. Finite State Machine / Section 8.2.2 [RFC4271] ...........67
3.36. UPDATE Message Handling / Section 9 [RFC4271] ............67
3.37. Decision Process / Section 9.1 [RFC4271] .................69
3.38. Phase 1: Calculation of Degree of Preference /
Section 9.1.1 ............................................70
3.39. Phase 2: Route Selection / Section 9.1.2 [RFC4271] .......71
3.40. Route Resolvability Condition / Section 9.1.2.1
[RFC4271] ................................................73
3.41. Breaking Ties (Phase 2) / Section 9.1.2.2 [RFC4271] ......74
3.42. Phase 3: Route Dissemination / Section 9.1.3 [RFC4271] ...76
3.43. Overlapping Routes / Section 9.1.4 [RFC4271] .............77
3.44. Update-Send Process / Section 9.2 [RFC4271] ..............79
3.45. Frequency of Route Advertisement / Section
9.2.1.1 [RFC4271] ........................................81
3.5. OPEN Message / Section 4.2 [RFC4271] ......................11
3.6. UPDATE Message Format / Section 4.3 [RFC4271] .............12
3.7. KEEPALIVE Message Format / Section 4.4 [RFC4271] ..........16
3.8. NOTIFICATION Message Format / Section 4.5 [RFC4271] .......17
3.9. Path Attributes /Section 5 [RFC4271] ......................17
3.10. ORIGIN / Section 5.1.1 [RFC4271] .........................22
3.11. AS_PATH / Section 5.1.2 [RFC4271] ........................22
3.12. NEXT_HOP / Section 5.1.3 [RFC4271] .......................23
3.13. MULTI_EXIT_DISC / Section 5.1.4 [RFC4271] ................27
3.14. LOCAL_PREF / Section 5.1.5 [RFC4271] .....................30
3.15. ATOMIC_AGGREGATE / Section 5.1.6 [RFC4271] ...............31
3.16. AGGREGATOR / Section 5.1.7 [RFC4271] .....................32
3.17. BGP Error Handling / Section 6 [RFC4271] .................34
3.18. Message Header Error Handling / Section 6.1 [RFC4271] ....34
3.19. OPEN Message Error Handling / Section 6.2 [RFC4271] ......36
3.20. UPDATE Message Error Handling / Section 6.3 [RFC4271] ....40
3.21. NOTIFICATION Message Error Handling / Section 6.4
[RFC4271] ................................................50
3.22. Hold Timer Expired Error Handling / Section 6.5
[RFC4271] ................................................51
3.23. Finite State Machine Error Handling / Section 6.6
[RFC4271] ................................................51
3.24. Cease / Section 6.7 [RFC4271] ............................51
3.25. BGP Connection Collision Detection / Section 6.8
[RFC4271] ................................................53
3.26. BGP Version Negotiation / Section 7 [RFC4271] ............54
3.27. BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) / Section 8 [RFC4271] .....55
3.28. Administrative Events / Section 8.1.2 [RFC4271] ..........55
3.29. Timer Events / Section 8.1.3 [RFC4271] ...................61
3.30. TCP Connection-Based Events / Section 8.1.4 [RFC4271] ....62
3.31. BGP Messages-Based Events / Section 8.1.5 [RFC4271] ......63
3.32. FSM Definition / Section 8.2.1 [RFC4271] .................65
3.33. FSM and Collision Detection / Section 8.2.1.2 [RFC4271] ..66
3.34. FSM Event numbers / Section 8.2.1.4 [RFC4271] ............66
3.35. Finite State Machine / Section 8.2.2 [RFC4271] ...........67
3.36. UPDATE Message Handling / Section 9 [RFC4271] ............67
3.37. Decision Process / Section 9.1 [RFC4271] .................69
3.38. Phase 1: Calculation of Degree of Preference /
Section 9.1.1 ............................................70
3.39. Phase 2: Route Selection / Section 9.1.2 [RFC4271] .......71
3.40. Route Resolvability Condition / Section 9.1.2.1
[RFC4271] ................................................73
3.41. Breaking Ties (Phase 2) / Section 9.1.2.2 [RFC4271] ......74
3.42. Phase 3: Route Dissemination / Section 9.1.3 [RFC4271] ...76
3.43. Overlapping Routes / Section 9.1.4 [RFC4271] .............77
3.44. Update-Send Process / Section 9.2 [RFC4271] ..............79
3.45. Frequency of Route Advertisement / Section
9.2.1.1 [RFC4271] ........................................81
3.46. Aggregating Routing Information / Section 9.2.2.2
[RFC4271] ................................................82
3.47. Route Selection Criteria / Section 9.3 [RFC4271] .........87
3.48. Originating BGP Routes / Section 9.4 [RFC4271] ...........88
3.49. BGP Timers / Section 10 [RFC4271] ........................88
3.50. TCP Options that May Be Used with BGP / Appendix
E [RFC4271] ..............................................91
3.51. Reducing Route Flapping / Appendix F.2 [RFC4271] .........92
3.52. Complex AS_PATH aggregation / Appendix F.6 [RFC4271] .....92
3.53. Security Considerations [RFC4271] ........................92
4. Additional BGP Implementations Information .....................93
4.1. Avici .....................................................93
4.2. Data Connection Ltd. ......................................94
4.3. Nokia .....................................................94
5. Security Considerations ........................................95
6. Normative References ...........................................95
7. Acknowledgements ...............................................96
3.46. Aggregating Routing Information / Section 9.2.2.2
[RFC4271] ................................................82
3.47. Route Selection Criteria / Section 9.3 [RFC4271] .........87
3.48. Originating BGP Routes / Section 9.4 [RFC4271] ...........88
3.49. BGP Timers / Section 10 [RFC4271] ........................88
3.50. TCP Options that May Be Used with BGP / Appendix
E [RFC4271] ..............................................91
3.51. Reducing Route Flapping / Appendix F.2 [RFC4271] .........92
3.52. Complex AS_PATH aggregation / Appendix F.6 [RFC4271] .....92
3.53. Security Considerations [RFC4271] ........................92
4. Additional BGP Implementations Information .....................93
4.1. Avici .....................................................93
4.2. Data Connection Ltd. ......................................94
4.3. Nokia .....................................................94
5. Security Considerations ........................................95
6. Normative References ...........................................95
7. Acknowledgements ...............................................96
This document reports results from a survey of implementations of
BGP-4 as specified in [RFC4271]. RFC 4271 is in alignment with
current deployments of BGP-4 and obsoletes the BGP standard
[RFC1771]. BGP is a widely deployed cornerstone of Internet
technology that continues to add additional functionality as the
needs of the Internet evolve. As deployed in the Internet, BGP-4
encompasses both this base specification and additional
specifications such as TCP MD5 [RFC2385], BGP Route Reflectors
[RFC2796], BGP Confederations [RFC3065], and BGP Route Refresh
[RFC2918].
This document reports results from a survey of implementations of
BGP-4 as specified in [RFC4271]. RFC 4271 is in alignment with
current deployments of BGP-4 and obsoletes the BGP standard
[RFC1771]. BGP is a widely deployed cornerstone of Internet
technology that continues to add additional functionality as the
needs of the Internet evolve. As deployed in the Internet, BGP-4
encompasses both this base specification and additional
specifications such as TCP MD5 [RFC2385], BGP Route Reflectors
[RFC2796], BGP Confederations [RFC3065], and BGP Route Refresh
[RFC2918].
The BGP-4 implementation survey had 259 detailed questions about compliance with [RFC4271]. Four implementers (Alcatel, Cisco, Laurel, and NextHop) completed the survey. Section 3 provides a compilation of those results.
BGP-4实施调查有259个关于遵守[RFC4271]的详细问题。四个实施者（阿尔卡特、思科、劳雷尔和NextHop）完成了调查。第3节提供了这些结果的汇编。
Section 2.1 highlights significant differences and Section 2.2 provides an overview of the differences between the four implementations. Section 2.3 provides interoperability information.
第2.1节强调了显著的差异，第2.2节概述了四种实现之间的差异。第2.3节提供了互操作性信息。
Due to the large number of BGP implementations and the small number of respondents, the editors took an informal survey to determine if the length of the original survey caused implementers not to submit it. Three implementers responded, and all indicated the length of the survey was the issue. Section 4 gives the results of this informal survey.
由于BGP实施的数量较多，而受访者人数较少，编辑进行了一次非正式调查，以确定原始调查的长度是否导致实施者不提交。三位实施者做出了回应，他们都表示调查的长度是问题所在。第4节给出了这项非正式调查的结果。
In this document, the editors have compiled the results of the implementation survey results and the informal survey.
在本文件中，编辑们汇编了执行情况调查结果和非正式调查结果。
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
本文件中的关键词“必须”、“不得”、“必需”、“应”、“不应”、“应”、“不应”、“建议”、“可”和“可选”应按照[RFC2119]中所述进行解释。
The respondents replied "Y" (yes) or "N" (no) to the survey's 259 questions to indicate whether their implementation supports the Functionality/Description of the [RFC2119] language in [RFC4271]. The respondents replied "O" (other) to indicate that the support is neither "Y" nor "N" (for example, an alternate behavior).
受访者对调查的259个问题回答“是”或“否”，以表明其实现是否支持[RFC4271]中[RFC2119]语言的功能/描述。受访者回答“O”（其他），表示支持既不是“Y”也不是“N”（例如，另一种行为）。
Each question received affirmative responses from at least two implementers (i.e., two "Y" responses, or one "Y" and one "O"), except the following questions:
每个问题都得到了至少两个实施者的肯定回答（即两个“Y”回答，或一个“Y”和一个“O”），但以下问题除外：
a) MUST - Linked Questions 212/213, regarding Section 9.1.4
a) 关于第9.1.4节的必须链接的问题212/213
Due to the format of the linked questions, three vendors (Cisco, Laurel, and NextHop) replied "N" to Question 213. (See Section 2.2 for details.)
由于链接问题的格式，三家供应商（Cisco、Laurel和NextHop）对问题213回答“N”。（详见第2.2节。）
b) SHALL NOT - Question 228, regarding Section 9.2.2.2
b) 不得——关于第9.2.2.2节的问题228
Three vendors (Alcatel, Cisco, and Laurel) answered "N" to SHALL NOT (meaning they did). One vendor (NextHop) indicated "O" matching the specification.
三家供应商（阿尔卡特、思科和劳雷尔）对SHALL NOT的回答为“N”（意思是他们确实这么做了）。一家供应商（NextHop）表示“O”符合规范。
Text: Routes that have different MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute SHALL NOT be aggregated. (Section 9.2.2.2, [RFC4271])
文本：不应聚合具有不同多出口盘属性的路由。（第9.2.2.2节，[RFC4271]）
c) SHOULD - Questions 257 and 258, regarding Appendix F
c) 应-关于附录F的问题257和258
Three vendors answered "N" and one vendor answered "Y" to Question 257. All four vendors answered "N" to Question 258. (Please note that support of Appendix F, "Implementation Recommendations", is optional.)
三家供应商对问题257回答“N”，一家供应商回答“Y”。四家供应商对问题258的回答均为“N”。（请注意，附录F“实施建议”的支持是可选的。）
Text: A BGP speaker which needs to withdraw a destination and send an update about a more specific or less specific route SHOULD combine them into the same UPDATE message. (Appendix F.2, [RFC4271])
文本：需要撤回目的地并发送关于更具体或不太具体路线的更新的BGP扬声器应将它们合并到相同的更新消息中。（附录F.2，[RFC4271]）
Text: The last instance (rightmost occurrence) of that AS number is kept. (Appendix F.6, [RFC4271])
Text：保留该AS编号的最后一个实例（最右边的引用）。（附录F.6，[RFC4271]）
d) MAY - Questions 180 and 254, regarding Sections 8.1.2.4 and 10
d) 五月-关于第8.1.2.4节和第10节的问题180和254
Three vendors answered "N", and 1 replied "Y" to Question 180.
三个供应商对问题180回答“N”，1个回答“Y”。
Text: The Event numbers (1-28) utilized in this state machine description aid in specifying the behavior of the BGP state machine. Implementations MAY use these numbers to provide network management information. The exact form of a FSM or the FSM events are specific to each implementation. (Section 8.1.2.4, [RFC4271])
文本：此状态机描述中使用的事件编号（1-28）有助于指定BGP状态机的行为。实现可以使用这些数字来提供网络管理信息。FSM或FSM事件的确切形式特定于每个实现。（第8.1.2.4节，[RFC4271]）
Editors' note: Section 8.1.2.4 was written to allow existing implementations to transition to the new event numbering. It was expected over time (3 years) that the FSM event numbering would be updated to the new numbering.
编者注：编写第8.1.2.4节是为了允许现有的实现过渡到新的事件编号。预计随着时间的推移（3年），FSM事件编号将更新为新编号。
Three vendors answered "N" and one answered "Y" to Question 254 about configurable jitter time values.
关于可配置抖动时间值的问题254，三家供应商回答“N”，一家回答“Y”。
Text: A given BGP speaker MAY apply the same jitter to each of these quantities regardless of the destinations to which the updates are being sent; that is, jitter need not be configured on a "per peer" basis. (Section 10, [RFC4271])
文本：一个给定的BGP扬声器可能会对这些数量中的每一个应用相同的抖动，而不管更新发送到哪个目的地；也就是说，不需要在“每个对等”的基础上配置抖动。（第10节，[RFC4271]）
Question: Is the jitter range configurable?
问题：抖动范围是否可配置？
This section provides the reader with a shortcut to the points where the four implementations differ.
本节为读者提供了四种实现不同点的快捷方式。
The following questions were not answered "Y" by all four respondents (Note that the question numbers correspond to the final digit of subsection numbers of Section 3):
以下问题未被所有四位受访者回答为“Y”（请注意，问题编号对应于第3节小节编号的最后一位）：
MUST 97, 106, 107, 111, 122, 125, 138, 141, 213
必须是97106107111122125138141213
SHALL 233, 239
应为233239
SHALL NOT 228
不应228
SHOULD 42, 117, 132, 146, 152, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175, 202, 225, 250, 255, 256
应该是42、117、132、146、152、155、156、157、158、159、160、161、163、164、165、169、170、171、173、174、175、202、225、250、255、256
SHOULD NOT 226
不应该226
MAY 67, 94, 121, 143, 180, 223, 247, 254
5月67日、94日、121日、143日、180日、223日、247日、254日
Other 236, 238
其他236238
Linked Questions 212/213
链接问题212/213
Three vendors answered "N" and one answered "Y" to Question 213 about the aggregation of routes. Questions 212 and 213 are grouped together.
对于关于路线聚合的问题213，三家供应商回答“N”，一家回答“Y”。问题212和213组合在一起。
Question 212 states: "The decision process MUST either install both routes or..."
问题212指出：“决策过程必须安装两条路由或…”
Question 213 states: "Aggregate the two routes and install the aggregated route, provided that both routes have the same value of the NEXT_HOP attribute"
问题213指出：“聚合两个路由并安装聚合路由，前提是两个路由具有相同的NEXT_HOP属性值”
Of the four respondents that said "Y" to Question 212, three said "N" to Question 213. Given the context of the question, answering "N" to Question 213 is appropriate.
在对问题212回答“Y”的四名受访者中，有三名对问题213回答“N”。鉴于问题的背景，对问题213回答“N”是适当的。
Alcatel Cisco Laurel NextHop Alcatel Y Y Cisco Y Laurel Y Y NextHop Y Y
阿尔卡特思科劳雷尔NextHop阿尔卡特Y思科Y劳雷尔Y NextHop Y
1.6.0 Alcatel Implementation Name/Version: Alcatel 7750 BGP Implementation Release 1.3 Date: July 2003 Contact Name: Devendra Raut Contact Email: Devendra.raut@Alcatel.com
1.6.0 阿尔卡特实施名称/版本：阿尔卡特7750 BGP实施版本1.3日期：2003年7月联系人姓名：Devendra Raut联系人电子邮件：Devendra。raut@Alcatel.com
1.6.1 Cisco
Implementation Name/Version: Cisco BGP Implementation, 12.0(27)S
Contact Name: Alvaro Retana
Date: 11/26/2003
1.6.1 Cisco
Implementation Name/Version: Cisco BGP Implementation, 12.0(27)S
Contact Name: Alvaro Retana
Date: 11/26/2003
1.6.2 Laurel
Implementation Name/Version: Laurel Networks 3.0
Contact Name: Manish Vora
Contact Email: vora@laurelnetworks.com
Date: 2/1/2004
1.6.2 Laurel
Implementation Name/Version: Laurel Networks 3.0
Contact Name: Manish Vora
Contact Email: vora@laurelnetworks.com
Date: 2/1/2004
1.6.3 NextHop Technologies Implementation Name/Version: Gated NGC 2.0, 2.2 Date: January 2004
1.6.3 NextHop Technologies实施名称/版本：门控NGC 2.0、2.2日期：2004年1月
For every item listed, the respondents indicated whether their implementation supports the Functionality/Description or not (Y/N) according to the [RFC2119] language indicated. Any respondent comments are included. If appropriate, the respondents indicated with "O" the fact that the support is neither Y/N (an alternate behavior, for example). Refer to the appropriate sections in [RFC4271] for additional details. Note that the last digit of the subsection number is the number of the survey question.
对于列出的每个项目，受访者根据所示的[RFC2119]语言说明其实施是否支持功能/说明（Y/N）。包括所有受访者的意见。如果合适，受访者用“O”表示支持既不是Y/N（例如，另一种行为）。有关更多详细信息，请参阅[RFC4271]中的相应章节。请注意，小节编号的最后一位数字是调查问题的编号。
3.0.1. Base Behavior
3.0.1. 基本行为
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the base behavior described in this section?
功能/描述：您的实现是否与本节中描述的基本行为兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.0.2. Local Policy Changes
3.0.2. 地方政策变化
Functionality/Description: To allow local policy changes to have the correct effect without resetting any BGP connections, a BGP speaker SHOULD either (a) retain the current version of the routes advertised to it by all of its peers for the duration of the connection, or (b) make use of the Route Refresh extension [RFC2918]
功能/说明：为了允许本地策略更改在不重置任何BGP连接的情况下产生正确的效果，BGP扬声器应（a）在连接期间保留所有对等方向其公布的路由的当前版本，或（b）使用路由刷新扩展[RFC2918]
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.1.3. Withdraw Routes from Service
3.1.3. 取消航线
Functionality/Description: Does your implementation support the three methods described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否支持本节中描述的三种方法？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.1.4. Path Attributes
3.1.4. 路径属性
Functionality/Description: Added to or modified before advertising the route
功能/说明：在发布路线广告之前添加或修改
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.2.5. Routing Information Bases
3.2.5. 路由信息库
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the RIB structure described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实施是否与本节中描述的肋骨结构兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.2.6. Next Hop Resolution
3.2.6. 下一跳分辨率
Functionality/Description: The next hop for each route in the Loc-RIB MUST be resolvable via the local BGP speaker's Routing Table
功能/说明：Loc RIB中每条路由的下一跳必须可通过本地BGP扬声器的路由表解析
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.3.7. Message Size
3.3.7. 消息大小
Functionality/Description: Does your implementation support the message sizes described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否支持本节中描述的消息大小？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.4.8. Marker
3.4.8. 标记
Functionality/Description: MUST be set to all ones
功能/说明：必须设置为“所有”
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.4.9. Length
3.4.9. 长
Functionality/Description: MUST always be at least 19 and no greater than 4096
功能/说明：必须始终至少为19且不大于4096
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.4.10. Length
3.4.10. 长
Functionality/Description: MAY be further constrained, depending on the message type
功能/说明：根据消息类型，可能会进一步受到限制
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.4.11. Message "Padding"
3.4.11. 消息“填充”
Functionality/Description: No "padding" of extra data after the message is allowed, so the Length field MUST have the smallest value required given the rest of the message
功能/说明：不允许在消息之后“填充”额外数据，因此长度字段必须具有给定消息其余部分所需的最小值
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.5.12. Hold Timer Calculation
3.5.12. 保持计时器计算
Functionality/Description: Use the smaller of its configured Hold Time and the Hold Time received in the OPEN message
功能/说明：使用其配置的保持时间和打开消息中接收到的保持时间中的较小者
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.5.13. Minimum Hold Time
3.5.13. 最小保持时间
Functionality/Description: MUST be either zero or at least three seconds
功能/说明：必须为零或至少三秒
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.5.14. Connection Rejection
3.5.14. 连接拒绝
Functionality/Description: Based on the Hold Time
功能/说明：基于保持时间
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Sends notification.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Sends notification.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.15. UPDATE
3.6.15. 使现代化
Functionality/Description: Simultaneously advertise a feasible route and withdraw multiple unfeasible routes from service
功能/描述：同时公布一条可行路线，并从服务中撤回多条不可行路线
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We have capability to process this
functionality on receiving end but
we don't send feasible & unfeasible
simultaneously.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We have capability to process this
functionality on receiving end but
we don't send feasible & unfeasible
simultaneously.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.16. Transitive Bit Setting
3.6.16. 传递位设置
Functionality/Description: For well-known attributes, the Transitive bit MUST be set to 1
功能/说明：对于已知属性，可传递位必须设置为1
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.17. Partial Bit Setting
3.6.17. 部分位设置
Functionality/Description: For well-known attributes and for optional non-transitive attributes the Partial bit MUST be set to 0
功能/说明：对于已知属性和可选非传递属性，部分位必须设置为0
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.18. Attribute Flags Octet Sending
3.6.18. 属性标志八位字节发送
Functionality/Description: Lower-order four bits set to zero
功能/说明：低阶四位设置为零
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.19. Attribute Flags Octet Receiving
3.6.19. 属性标志八位字节接收
Functionality/Description: Lower-order four bits ignored
功能/说明：忽略低阶四位
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.20. NEXT_HOP
3.6.20. 下一步
Functionality/Description: Used as the next hop to the destinations listed in the NLRI field of the UPDATE message
功能/说明：用作更新消息的NLRI字段中列出的目的地的下一个跃点
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.21. MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.6.21. 多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: Used by a BGP speaker's decision process to discriminate among multiple entry points to a neighboring autonomous system
功能/描述：BGP说话人的决策过程用于区分相邻自治系统的多个入口点
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.22. AGGREGATOR IP Address
3.6.22. 聚合器IP地址
Functionality/Description: Same address as the one used for the BGP Identifier of the speaker
功能/说明：与发言者BGP标识符使用的地址相同
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Default behavior. Can be configured
different from BGP ID.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Default behavior. Can be configured
different from BGP ID.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.23. UPDATE messages that include the same address prefix in the WITHDRAWN ROUTES and Network Layer Reachability Information fields
3.6.23. 更新在撤回的路由和网络层可达性信息字段中包含相同地址前缀的消息
Functionality/Description: UPDATE messages SHOULD NOT include that information
功能/说明：更新消息不应包含该信息
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.24. UPDATE messages that include the same address prefix in the WITHDRAWN ROUTES and Network Layer Reachability Information fields
3.6.24. 更新在撤回的路由和网络层可达性信息字段中包含相同地址前缀的消息
Functionality/Description: The BGP speaker MUST be able to handle them
功能/说明：BGP扬声器必须能够处理这些问题
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.6.25. UPDATE messages that include the same address prefix in the WITHDRAWN ROUTES and Network Layer Reachability Information fields
3.6.25. 更新在撤回的路由和网络层可达性信息字段中包含相同地址前缀的消息
Functionality/Description: Treated as if the WITHDRAWN ROUTES doesn't contain the address prefix
功能/说明：视为撤回的路由不包含地址前缀
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Withdrawn routes are processed
before NLRI fields. Hence we get
the desired behavior.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Withdrawn routes are processed
before NLRI fields. Hence we get
the desired behavior.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.7.26. Maximum KEEPALIVE Frequency
3.7.26. 最大保持频率
Functionality/Description: Not greater than one second
功能/说明：不超过1秒
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.7.27. KEEPALIVE Messages Rate
3.7.27. 保留消息速率
Functionality/Description: Adjusted as a function of the Hold Time interval
功能/说明：根据保持时间间隔进行调整
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.7.28. Negotiated Hold Time of 0
3.7.28. 协商保持时间为0
Functionality/Description: No KEEPALIVEs sent
功能/说明：未发送保留页
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.8.29. NOTIFICATION Message
3.8.29. 通知消息
Functionality/Description: Does your implementation support the NOTIFICATION Message as described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否支持本节所述的通知消息？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.30. Path Attributes
3.9.30. 路径属性
Functionality/Description: Does your implementation support the path attributes as described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否支持本节所述的路径属性？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.31. Well-Known Attributes
3.9.31. 众所周知的属性
Functionality/Description: Recognized by all BGP implementations
功能/说明：所有BGP实施都能识别
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.32. Mandatory Attributes
3.9.32. 强制性属性
Functionality/Description: Included in every UPDATE message that contains NLRI
功能/说明：包含在每个包含NLRI的更新消息中
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.33/34. Discretionary Attributes
3.9.33/34. 自由裁量属性
Functionality/Description: Sent in a particular UPDATE message
功能/说明：在特定更新消息中发送
RFC2119: MAY or MAY NOT
RFC2119：可以还是不可以
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.35. Well-Known Attributes
3.9.35. 众所周知的属性
Functionality/Description: Passed along (after proper updating, if necessary) to other BGP peers
功能/描述：传递给其他BGP对等方（在适当更新后，如有必要）
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.36. Optional Attributes
3.9.36. 可选属性
Functionality/Description: In addition to well-known attributes, each path MAY contain one or more optional attributes
功能/说明：除了众所周知的属性外，每个路径可能包含一个或多个可选属性
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.37. Unrecognized Transitive Optional Attributes
3.9.37. 无法识别的可传递可选属性
Functionality/Description: Accepted
功能/说明：接受
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.38. Partial Bit for Unrecognized Transitive Optional Attributes
3.9.38. 无法识别的可传递可选属性的部分位
Functionality/Description: Set to 1 if the attribute is accepted and passed to other BGP speakers
功能/说明：如果属性被接受并传递给其他BGP扬声器，则设置为1
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.39. Unrecognized Non-Transitive Optional Attributes
3.9.39. 无法识别的非传递可选属性
Functionality/Description: Quietly ignored and not passed along to other BGP peers
功能/描述：悄悄忽略，不传递给其他BGP对等方
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.40. New Transitive Optional Attributes
3.9.40. 新的可传递可选属性
Functionality/Description: Attached to the path by the originator or by any other BGP speaker in the path
功能/说明：由发起人或路径中的任何其他BGP扬声器连接到路径
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.41. Optional Attributes
3.9.41. 可选属性
Functionality/Description: Updated by BGP speakers in the path
功能/说明：由路径中的BGP扬声器更新
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.42. Path Attributes
3.9.42. 路径属性
Functionality/Description: Ordered in ascending order of attribute type
功能/说明：按属性类型的升序排序
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O All attributes are ordered in
ascending order except Extended
Community, which is type 16 but we
send it out after community
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y except for MBGP which is always last
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O All attributes are ordered in
ascending order except Extended
Community, which is type 16 but we
send it out after community
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y except for MBGP which is always last
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.43. Out of Order Received Path Attributes
3.9.43. 收到的路径属性顺序不正确
Functionality/Description: Receiver MUST be able to handle
功能/说明：接收器必须能够处理
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.9.44. Mandatory Attributes
3.9.44. 强制性属性
Functionality/Description: Present in all exchanges if NLRI are contained in the UPDATE message
功能/说明：如果更新消息中包含NLRI，则在所有交换中都存在
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.10.45. ORIGIN
3.10.45. 起源
Functionality/Description: Value SHOULD NOT be changed by any speaker, except the originator
功能/说明：除发起者外，任何演讲者不得更改值
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.11.46. AS_PATH
3.11.46. AS_路径
Functionality/Description: Not modified when advertising a route to an internal peer
功能/说明：向内部对等方公布路由时未修改
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.11.47. Segment Overflow
3.11.47. 段溢出
Functionality/Description: If the act of prepending will cause an overflow in the AS_PATH segment, i.e., more than 255 ASs, it SHOULD prepend a new segment of type AS_SEQUENCE and prepend its own AS number to this new segment
功能/说明：如果预编操作将导致AS_路径段溢出，即超过255个ASs，则应预编AS_序列类型的新段，并将其自身的AS编号预编到此新段
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.11.48. Prepending
3.11.48. 预编
Functionality/Description: The local system MAY include/prepend more than one instance of its own AS number in the AS_PATH attribute
功能/说明：本地系统可能在“AS_路径”属性中包含/预先添加其自身AS编号的多个实例
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.49. NEXT_HOP
3.12.49. 下一步
Functionality/Description: Used as the next hop to the destinations listed in the UPDATE message
功能/说明：用作更新消息中列出的目标的下一个跃点
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.50. NEXT_HOP
3.12.50. 下一步
Functionality/Description: When sending a message to an internal peer, if the route is not locally originated, the BGP speaker SHOULD NOT modify the NEXT_HOP attribute, unless it has been explicitly configured to announce its own IP address as the NEXT_HOP
功能/描述：向内部对等方发送消息时，如果路由不是本地发起的，BGP扬声器不应修改下一跳属性，除非已明确配置为将其自己的IP地址宣布为下一跳
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.51. NEXT_HOP
3.12.51. 下一步
Functionality/Description: When announcing a locally originated route to an internal peer, the BGP speaker SHOULD use as the NEXT_HOP the interface address of the router through which the announced network is reachable for the speaker
功能/说明：当向内部对等方宣布一条本地发起的路由时，BGP扬声器应使用路由器的接口地址作为下一跳，通过该地址，扬声器可以访问宣布的网络
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.52. NEXT_HOP
3.12.52. 下一步
Functionality/Description: If the route is directly connected to the speaker, or the interface address of the router through which the announced network is reachable for the speaker is the internal peer's address, then the BGP speaker SHOULD use for the NEXT_HOP attribute its own IP address (the address of the interface that is used to reach the peer)
功能/描述：如果路由直接连接到扬声器，或者扬声器可通过路由器的接口地址（宣布的网络可通过该地址访问）是内部对等方的地址，则BGP扬声器应将其自己的IP地址用于下一跳属性（用于到达对等方的接口地址）
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.53. "First Party" NEXT_HOP
3.12.53. “第一党”下一跳
Functionality/Description: If the external peer to which the route is being advertised shares a common subnet with one of the interfaces of the announcing BGP speaker, the speaker MAY use the IP address associated with such an interface in the NEXT_HOP attribute
功能/描述：如果路由被播发到的外部对等方与播发BGP扬声器的一个接口共享一个公共子网，则扬声器可以在下一跳属性中使用与该接口关联的IP地址
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.54. Default NEXT_HOP
3.12.54. 默认下一跳
Functionality/Description: IP address of the interface that the speaker uses to establish the BGP connection to peer X
功能/说明：扬声器用于建立与对等X的BGP连接的接口的IP地址
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.55. NEXT_HOP Propagation
3.12.55. 下一跳传播
Functionality/Description: The speaker MAY be configured to propagate the NEXT_HOP attribute. In this case when advertising a route that the speaker learned from one of its peers, the NEXT_HOP attribute of the advertised route is exactly the same as the NEXT_HOP attribute of the learned route (the speaker just doesn't modify the NEXT_HOP attribute)
功能/说明：扬声器可配置为传播下一跳属性。在这种情况下，当播发演讲者从其对等方之一学习的路由时，播发路由的下一跳属性与学习路由的下一跳属性完全相同（演讲者只是不修改下一跳属性）
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.56. Third Party NEXT_HOP
3.12.56. 第三方下一跳
Functionality/Description: MUST be able to support disabling it
功能/说明：必须能够支持禁用它
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.57. NEXT_HOP
3.12.57. 下一步
Functionality/Description: A route originated by a BGP speaker SHALL NOT be advertised to a peer using an address of that peer as NEXT_HOP
功能/说明：BGP扬声器发起的路由不得使用该对等方的地址作为下一跳向该对等方播发
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.58. NEXT_HOP
3.12.58. 下一步
Functionality/Description: A BGP speaker SHALL NOT install a route with itself as the next hop
功能/说明：BGP扬声器不得安装自身作为下一跳的路由
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.59. NEXT_HOP
3.12.59. 下一步
Functionality/Description: Used to determine the actual outbound interface and immediate next-hop address that SHOULD be used to forward transit packets to the associated destinations
功能/描述：用于确定实际出站接口和应用于将传输数据包转发到相关目的地的即时下一跳地址
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.60. Resolved NEXT_HOP IP Address
3.12.60. 已解析下一跳IP地址
Functionality/Description: If the entry specifies an attached subnet, but does not specify a next-hop address, then the address in the NEXT_HOP attribute SHOULD be used as the immediate next-hop address
功能/说明：如果条目指定了连接的子网，但未指定下一跳地址，则下一跳属性中的地址应用作直接下一跳地址
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.12.61. Resolved NEXT_HOP IP Address
3.12.61. 已解析下一跳IP地址
Functionality/Description: If the entry also specifies the next-hop address, this address SHOULD be used as the immediate next-hop address for packet forwarding
功能/说明：如果条目还指定了下一跳地址，则该地址应用作数据包转发的直接下一跳地址
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.62. Preferred Metric
3.13.62. 首选度量
Functionality/Description: Lowest value
功能/说明：最低值
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.63. MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.13.63. 多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: If received over EBGP, the MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute MAY be propagated over IBGP to other BGP speakers within the same AS
功能/说明：如果通过EBGP接收，则可以通过IBGP将MULTI_EXIT_DISC属性传播到与相同系统内的其他BGP扬声器
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.64. MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.13.64. 多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: If received from a neighboring AS, it MUST NOT be propagated to other neighboring ASes
功能/说明：如果从相邻AS接收，则不得将其传播到其他相邻AS
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.65. Remove MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.13.65. 卸下多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: Local configuration mechanism to remove the attribute from a route
功能/说明：从路由中删除属性的本地配置机制
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.66. Remove MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.13.66. 卸下多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: Done prior to determining the degree of preference of the route and performing route selection
功能/说明：在确定路线偏好程度和执行路线选择之前完成
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.67. MULTI_EXIT_DISC Alteration
3.13.67. 多出口光盘转换
Functionality/Description: An implementation MAY also (based on local configuration) alter the value of the MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute received over EBGP
功能/说明：实现还可以（基于本地配置）更改通过EBGP接收的MULTI_EXIT_DISC属性的值
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.13.68. MULTI_EXIT_DISC Alteration
3.13.68. 多出口光盘转换
Functionality/Description: Done prior to determining the degree of preference of the route and performing route selection
功能/说明：在确定路线偏好程度和执行路线选择之前完成
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.14.69. LOCAL_PREF
3.14.69. 本地优先
Functionality/Description: Included in all UPDATE messages that a given BGP speaker sends to the other internal peers
功能/说明：包含在给定BGP扬声器发送给其他内部对等方的所有更新消息中
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.14.70. Degree of Preference
3.14.70. 优惠程度
Functionality/Description: Calculated for each external route based on the locally configured policy, and included when advertising a route to its internal peers
功能/说明：根据本地配置的策略为每个外部路由计算，并在向其内部对等方公布路由时包含
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.14.71. LOCAL_PREF
3.14.71. 本地优先
Functionality/Description: Higher degree of preference MUST be preferred
功能/说明：必须优先选择更高的偏好
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.14.72. LOCAL_PREF
3.14.72. 本地优先
Functionality/Description: Not included in UPDATE messages sent to external peers, except for the case of BGP Confederations [RFC3065]
功能/说明：不包括在发送给外部对等方的更新消息中，BGP联合会的情况除外[RFC3065]
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.14.73. LOCAL_PREF
3.14.73. 本地优先
Functionality/Description: Ignored if received from an external peer, except for the case of BGP Confederations [RFC3065]
功能/说明：如果从外部对等方接收，则忽略，BGP联合会除外[RFC3065]
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.15.74. ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
3.15.74. 原子聚集体
Functionality/Description: Included if an aggregate excludes at least some of the AS numbers present in the AS_PATH of the routes that are aggregated as a result of dropping the AS_SET
功能/说明：如果聚合排除了由于删除AS_集而聚合的路由的AS_路径中存在的至少一些AS编号，则包括
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.15.75. Received ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
3.15.75. 接收到的原子集合
Functionality/Description: BGP speaker SHOULD NOT remove the attribute from the route when propagating it to other speakers
功能/说明：BGP speaker在向其他扬声器传播该属性时，不应从路由中删除该属性
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.15.76. Received ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
3.15.76. 接收到的原子集合
Functionality/Description: BGP speaker MUST NOT make any NLRI of that route more specific (as defined in 9.1.4)
功能/说明：BGP扬声器不得使该路线的任何NLRI更具体（如9.1.4所定义）
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.16.77. AGGREGATOR
3.16.77. 聚合器
Functionality/Description: Included in updates which are formed by aggregation (see Section 9.2.2.2)
功能/说明：包含在通过聚合形成的更新中（见第9.2.2.2节）
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.16.78. AGGREGATOR
3.16.78. 聚合器
Functionality/Description: Added by the BGP speaker performing route aggregation
功能/说明：由执行路由聚合的BGP演讲者添加
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.16.79. AGGREGATOR
3.16.79. 聚合器
Functionality/Description: Contain local AS number and IP address
功能/说明：包含本地AS编号和IP地址
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Default behavior. Can be configured
different from BGP ID.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Default behavior. Can be configured
different from BGP ID.
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.16.80. AGGREGATOR IP Address
3.16.80. 聚合器IP地址
Functionality/Description: The same as the BGP Identifier of the speaker
功能/说明：与扬声器的BGP标识符相同
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.17.81. Error Handling
3.17.81. 错误处理
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the error handling procedures described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否与本节中描述的错误处理过程兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.17.82. Error Subcode
3.17.82. 错误子码
Functionality/Description: Zero, if it is not specified
功能/说明：如果未指定，则为零
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.83. Message Header Errors
3.18.83. 消息头错误
Functionality/Description: Indicated by sending the NOTIFICATION message with Error Code Message Header Error
功能/说明：通过发送带有错误代码的通知消息来指示消息头错误
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.84. Synchronization Error
3.18.84. 同步错误
Functionality/Description: Error Subcode MUST be set to Connection Not Synchronized
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为连接未同步
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.85. Message Length
3.18.85. 消息长度
Functionality/Description: Use the Bad Message Length Error Subcode to indicate an incorrect message length
功能/说明：使用错误消息长度错误子代码指示错误的消息长度
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.86. Bad Message Length
3.18.86. 错误消息长度
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the erroneous Length field
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含错误的长度字段
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.87. Type Field
3.18.87. 类型字段
Functionality/Description: If the Type field of the message header is not recognized, then the Error Subcode MUST be set to
功能/说明：如果无法识别消息头的类型字段，则必须将错误子代码设置为
Bad Message Type
错误消息类型
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.18.88. Bad Message Type
3.18.88. 错误消息类型
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the erroneous Type field
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含错误的类型字段
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.89. OPEN Message Errors
3.19.89. 打开消息错误
Functionality/Description: Indicated by sending the NOTIFICATION message with Error Code OPEN Message Error
功能/说明：通过发送错误代码为OPEN message Error的通知消息表示
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.90. Version Number Not Supported
3.19.90. 不支持版本号
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Unsupported Version Number
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为不受支持的版本号
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.91. Unacceptable Autonomous System Field
3.19.91. 不可接受自治系统域
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Bad Peer AS
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为坏对等
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.92. Unacceptable Hold Time Error Subcode
3.19.92. 不可接受的保持时间错误子代码
Functionality/Description: Used if the Hold Time field of the OPEN message is unacceptable
功能/说明：如果打开消息的保持时间字段不可接受，则使用
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.93. Hold Time Rejection
3.19.93. 保持时间拒绝
Functionality/Description: Values of one or two seconds
功能/说明：1秒或2秒的值
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.94. Hold Time Rejection
3.19.94. 保持时间拒绝
Functionality/Description: An implementation may reject any proposed Hold Time
功能/说明：实施可能拒绝任何提议的保持时间
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.95. Hold Time
3.19.95. 等待时间
Functionality/Description: If accepted, then the negotiated value MUST be used
功能/说明：如果接受，则必须使用协商值
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.96. Syntactically Incorrect BGP Identifier
3.19.96. 语法错误的BGP标识符
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Bad BGP Identifier
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为坏BGP标识符
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.97. Not Recognized Optional Parameters
3.19.97. 无法识别的可选参数
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Unsupported Optional Parameters
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为不受支持的可选参数
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We may fix this.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We may fix this.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.19.98. Recognized but Malformed Optional Parameters
3.19.98. 可识别但格式不正确的可选参数
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to 0 (Unspecific)
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为0（非特定）
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.99. UPDATE Message Errors
3.20.99. 更新消息错误
Functionality/Description: Indicated by sending the NOTIFICATION message with Error Code UPDATE Message Error
功能/说明：通过发送带有错误代码的通知消息来指示更新消息错误
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.100. Too Large
3.20.100. 太大
Functionality/Description: If the Withdrawn Routes Length or Total Attribute Length is too large, then the Error Subcode MUST be set to Malformed Attribute List
功能/说明：如果提取的路由长度或总属性长度太大，则必须将错误子代码设置为格式错误的属性列表
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.101. Conflicting Flags
3.20.101. 冲突旗
Functionality/Description: If any recognized attribute has Attribute Flags that conflict with the Attribute Type Code, then the Error Subcode MUST be set to Attribute Flags Error
功能/说明：如果任何已识别的属性具有与属性类型代码冲突的属性标志，则必须将错误子代码设置为属性标志错误
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.102. Conflicting Flags
3.20.102. 冲突旗
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the erroneous attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含错误属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.103. Conflicting Length
3.20.103. 冲突长度
Functionality/Description: If any recognized attribute has Attribute Length that conflicts with the expected length, then the Error Subcode MUST be set to Attribute Length Error
功能/说明：如果任何已识别属性的属性长度与预期长度冲突，则必须将错误子代码设置为属性长度错误
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.104. Conflicting Length
3.20.104. 冲突长度
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the erroneous attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含错误属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.105. Missing Mandatory Well-Known Attributes
3.20.105. 缺少必需的已知属性
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Missing Well-known Attribute
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为缺少已知属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.106. Missing Mandatory Well-Known Attributes
3.20.106. 缺少必需的已知属性
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the Attribute Type Code of the missing well-known attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含缺少的已知属性的属性类型代码
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We plan to fix this in future.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We plan to fix this in future.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.107. Unrecognized Mandatory Well-Known Attributes
3.20.107. 无法识别的强制已知属性
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Unrecognized Well-known Attribute
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为无法识别的已知属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We set error subcode to Attribute
Flags Error, but we intend to
correct this soon.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We set error subcode to Attribute
Flags Error, but we intend to
correct this soon.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.108. Unrecognized Mandatory Well-Known Attributes
3.20.108. 无法识别的强制已知属性
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the unrecognized attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含无法识别的属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.109. Undefined ORIGIN
3.20.109. 未定义原点
Functionality/Description: The Error Sub-code MUST be set to Invalid Origin Attribute
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为无效的原始属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.110. Undefined ORIGIN
3.20.110. 未定义原点
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the unrecognized attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含无法识别的属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.111. Syntactically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.111. 语法错误的下一跳
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Invalid NEXT_HOP Attribute
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为无效的下一跳属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N Ignores the prefix in case of
martian nexthop, and in case of
length not equal to IPv4
address-length, we send
NOTIFICATION with error subcode
Attribute Length error.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N Ignores the prefix in case of
martian nexthop, and in case of
length not equal to IPv4
address-length, we send
NOTIFICATION with error subcode
Attribute Length error.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.112. Syntactically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.112. 语法错误的下一跳
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the incorrect attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含不正确的属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.113. NEXT_HOP Semantic Correctness
3.20.113. 下一跳语义正确性
Functionality/Description: NEXT_HOP is checked for semantic correctness against the criteria in this section
功能/说明：根据本节中的标准检查下一跳的语义正确性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.114. NEXT_HOP Semantic Correctness
3.20.114. 下一跳语义正确性
Functionality/Description: Not be the IP address of the receiving speaker
功能/说明：不是接收扬声器的IP地址
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.115. NEXT_HOP Semantic Correctness
3.20.115. 下一跳语义正确性
Functionality/Description: In the case of an EBGP where the sender and receiver are one IP hop away from each other, either the IP address in the NEXT_HOP MUST be the sender's IP address (that is used to establish the BGP connection), or the interface associated with the NEXT_HOP IP address MUST share a common subnet with the receiving BGP speaker
功能/描述：如果EBGP的发送方和接收方彼此之间有一个IP跃点，则下一个跃点中的IP地址必须是发送方的IP地址（用于建立BGP连接），或者与下一个跃点IP地址相关联的接口必须与接收BGP扬声器共享一个公共子网
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.116. Semantically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.116. 语义不正确的下一跳
Functionality/Description: Error logged
功能/说明：记录错误
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.117. Semantically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.117. 语义不正确的下一跳
Functionality/Description: Route Ignored
功能/说明：忽略路由
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.118. Semantically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.118. 语义不正确的下一跳
Functionality/Description: NOTIFICATION not sent
功能/说明：未发送通知
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.119. Semantically Incorrect NEXT_HOP
3.20.119. 语义不正确的下一跳
Functionality/Description: Connection not closed
功能/说明：连接未关闭
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.120. Syntactically Incorrect AS_PATH
3.20.120. 语法上不正确的AS_路径
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Malformed AS_PATH
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为格式错误的AS\U路径
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.121. First Neighbor in AS_PATH Check
3.20.121. AS_路径检查中的第一个邻居
Functionality/Description: If the UPDATE message is received from an external peer, the local system MAY check whether the leftmost AS in the AS_PATH attribute is equal to the autonomous system number of the peer that sent the message
功能/说明：如果从外部对等方接收更新消息，本地系统可能会检查AS_路径属性中最左侧的AS是否等于发送消息的对等方的自治系统编号
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.122. First Neighbor in AS_PATH Check
3.20.122. AS_路径检查中的第一个邻居
Functionality/Description: If the check determines that this is not the case, the Error Subcode MUST be set to Malformed AS_PATH
功能/说明：如果检查确定情况并非如此，则必须将错误子代码设置为格式错误的AS_路径
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.123. Optional Attributes
3.20.123. 可选属性
Functionality/Description: Value MUST be checked if the attribute is recognized
功能/说明：如果识别属性，则必须检查值
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.124. Optional Attribute Error
3.20.124. 可选属性错误
Functionality/Description: The attribute MUST be discarded
功能/说明：必须放弃该属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.125. Optional Attribute Error
3.20.125. 可选属性错误
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Optional Attribute Error
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为可选属性Error
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N What exactly is optional attribute e.g., If error is flag related, we send update flag error subcode, if it is length related, we send update length error subcode. These granular subcodes are better in terms of debugging than optional attribute error. Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y Only optional attribute error that doesn't have a more specific error, is the version 3 to version 4 error for the atomic aggregate. All others default to more specific error codes if implementation.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:N可选属性具体是什么，例如，如果错误与标志相关，则发送更新标志错误子代码；如果错误与长度相关，则发送更新长度错误子代码。就调试而言，这些粒度子代码比可选的属性错误更好。Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:Y唯一没有更具体错误的可选属性错误是原子聚合的版本3到版本4错误。如果执行，则所有其他错误代码默认为更具体的错误代码。
3.20.126. Optional Attribute Error
3.20.126. 可选属性错误
Functionality/Description: The Data field MUST contain the attribute
功能/说明：数据字段必须包含属性
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.127. Duplicate Attributes
3.20.127. 重复属性
Functionality/Description: If any attribute appears more than once in the UPDATE message, then the Error Subcode MUST be set to Malformed Attribute List
功能/说明：如果任何属性在更新消息中出现多次，则必须将错误子代码设置为格式错误的属性列表
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.128. Syntactically Incorrect NLRI Field
3.20.128. 语法错误的NLRI字段
Functionality/Description: The Error Subcode MUST be set to Invalid Network Field
功能/说明：错误子代码必须设置为无效的网络字段
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.129. Semantically Incorrect NLRI Field
3.20.129. 语义不正确的NLRI字段
Functionality/Description: An error SHOULD be logged locally
功能/说明：应在本地记录错误
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.130. Semantically Incorrect NLRI Field
3.20.130. 语义不正确的NLRI字段
Functionality/Description: The prefix SHOULD be ignored
功能/说明：应忽略前缀
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.20.131. UPDATE with no NLRI
3.20.131. 更新时没有NLRI
Functionality/Description: An UPDATE message that contains correct path attributes, but no NLRI, SHALL be treated as a valid UPDATE message
功能/说明：包含正确路径属性但没有NLRI的更新消息应视为有效的更新消息
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.21.132. Error in NOTIFICATION Message
3.21.132. 通知消息中出现错误
Functionality/Description: Noticed, logged locally, and brought to the attention of the administration of the peer
功能/描述：注意到，本地记录，并提请对等管理层注意
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.22.133. Hold Timer Expired
3.22.133. 保持计时器已过期
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the error handling procedures described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否与本节中描述的错误处理过程兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.23.134. Finite State Machine Errors
3.23.134. 有限状态机错误
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the error handling procedures described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否与本节中描述的错误处理过程兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.24.135. Cease NOTIFICATION
3.24.135. 停止通知
Functionality/Description: Used in absence of any fatal errors if a BGP peer chooses at any given time to close its BGP connection
功能/说明：如果BGP对等方在任何给定时间选择关闭其BGP连接，则在没有任何致命错误的情况下使用
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We close the TCP session without
CEASE NOTIFICATION.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We close the TCP session without
CEASE NOTIFICATION.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.24.136. Cease NOTIFICATION
3.24.136. 停止通知
Functionality/Description: Not used for specified fatal errors
功能/说明：不用于指定的致命错误
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.24.137. Upper bound on the number of address prefixes the speaker is willing to accept from a neighbor
3.24.137. 说话人愿意接受邻居地址前缀数量的上限
Functionality/Description: Support by local configuration
功能/说明：本地配置支持
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.24.138. Upper bound on the number of address prefixes the speaker is willing to accept from a neighbor
3.24.138. 说话人愿意接受邻居地址前缀数量的上限
Functionality/Description: If exceeded and the BGP speaker decides to terminate its BGP connection, the Cease NOTIFICATION MUST be used
功能/说明：如果超出此范围，且BGP扬声器决定终止其BGP连接，则必须使用停止通知
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We don't send CEASE but we plan to correct that soon. Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y No termination of peers is supported We are considering support with the maximum prefix document for later releases.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y思科Y/N/O/Comments:N我们不发送Stop，但我们计划很快纠正。Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:Y不支持终止对等点我们正在考虑为以后的版本提供最大前缀文档支持。
3.24.139. Upper bound on the number of address prefixes the speaker is willing to accept from a neighbor
3.24.139. 说话人愿意接受邻居地址前缀数量的上限
Functionality/Description: Log locally
功能/说明：本地登录
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.25.140. Connection Collision
3.25.140. 连接冲突
Functionality/Description: One of the connections MUST be closed
功能/说明：必须关闭其中一个连接
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.25.141. Receipt of an OPEN Message
3.25.141. 收到公开信息
Functionality/Description: The local system MUST examine all of its connections that are in the OpenConfirm state
功能/说明：本地系统必须检查其处于OpenConfirm状态的所有连接
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We detect collision through some
other implementation specific way
and resolve by method specified in
the document.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We detect collision through some
other implementation specific way
and resolve by method specified in
the document.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.25.142. Receipt of an OPEN Message
3.25.142. 收到公开信息
Functionality/Description: Examine connections in an OpenSent state if it knows the BGP Identifier of the peer by means outside of the protocol
功能/描述：在OpenSent状态下检查连接，如果它通过协议之外的方式知道对等方的BGP标识符
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.26.143. Version Negotiation
3.26.143. 版本协商
Functionality/Description: Multiple attempts to open a BGP connection, starting with the highest version number each supports
功能/说明：多次尝试打开BGP连接，从每个支持的最高版本号开始
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N Supports only version 4 Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We resolve it through config. If Config is for version 3, and we get version 4, OPEN will always fail. Similarly, if configed (default) is version 4 and peers configured is 3, we don't try to negotiate version 3 unless we have configured it. Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N Supports only version 4.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:N仅支持版本4 Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:O我们通过配置解决它。如果配置是针对版本3的，而我们得到的是版本4，则OPEN将始终失败。类似地，如果configed（默认）是version 4，而peers configured是version 3，我们不会尝试协商version 3，除非我们已经配置了它。Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:N仅支持版本4。
3.26.144. Future Versions of BGP
3.26.144. BGP的未来版本
Functionality/Description: MUST retain the format of the OPEN and NOTIFICATION messages
功能/说明：必须保留打开和通知消息的格式
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.27.145. FSM
3.27.145. 密克罗尼西亚联邦
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the conceptual FSM described in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否与本节中描述的概念性FSM兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.146. Optional Session Attribute Settings
3.28.146. 可选会话属性设置
Functionality/Description: Each event has an indication of what optional session attributes SHOULD be set at each stage
功能/描述：每个事件都指示在每个阶段应设置哪些可选会话属性
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Its rather vague. We have an option
Of manually starting or stopping
sessions but not an option for all
optional session attributes that are
listed in the document.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y The following optional attributes
are implied in this implementation:
1) Automatic start, 2) Automatic
Stop, 3)
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Its rather vague. We have an option
Of manually starting or stopping
sessions but not an option for all
optional session attributes that are
listed in the document.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y The following optional attributes
are implied in this implementation:
1) Automatic start, 2) Automatic
Stop, 3)
3.28.147. Event1: ManualStart
3.28.147. 事件1：手动启动
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment attribute SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：被动设置CPEstablish属性应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.148. Event3: AutomaticStart
3.28.148. 事件3：自动启动
Functionality/Description: The AllowAutomaticStart attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：AllowAutomaticStart属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.149. Event3: AutomaticStart
3.28.149. 事件3：自动启动
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment optional session attribute SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：被动设置CPEstablish可选会话属性应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.150. Event3: AutomaticStart
3.28.150. 事件3：自动启动
Functionality/Description: DampPeerOscillations SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute, so it is always FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute, so it is always FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.151. Event4: ManualStart_with_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.151. 事件4：使用被动设置手动启动
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/描述：被动设置属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y We wait for some fixed time before
initiating OPEN.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y We wait for some fixed time before
initiating OPEN.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.152. Event4: ManualStart_with_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.152. 事件4：使用被动设置手动启动
Functionality/Description: The DampPeerOscillations attribute SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations属性应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute so it is FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O We don't support DampPeerOscilation
attribute with a setting of off, and
hence Event 4. Future version will
support Event 4
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute so it is FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O We don't support DampPeerOscilation
attribute with a setting of off, and
hence Event 4. Future version will
support Event 4
3.28.153. Event5: AutomaticStart_with_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.153. 事件5：自动启动与被动设置
Functionality/Description: The AllowAutomaticStart attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：AllowAutomaticStart属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.154. Event5: AutomaticStart_with_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.154. 事件5：自动启动与被动设置
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/描述：被动设置属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.155. Event5: AutomaticStart_with_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.155. 事件5：自动启动与被动设置
Functionality/Description: The DampPeerOscillations SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute, so always FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O We don't support DampPeerOscilation
attribute with a setting of off, and
hence Event 5. Future version will
support Event 5
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute, so always FALSE.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O We don't support DampPeerOscilation
attribute with a setting of off, and
hence Event 5. Future version will
support Event 5
3.28.156. Event6: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations
3.28.156. 事件6：自动启动，带湿隔离
Functionality/Description: The AllowAutomaticStart attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：AllowAutomaticStart属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.157. Event6: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations
3.28.157. 事件6：自动启动，带湿隔离
Functionality/Description: The DampPeerOscillations attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.158. Event6: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations
3.28.158. 事件6：自动启动，带湿隔离
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment attribute SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：被动设置CPEstablish属性应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event6.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event6.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.159. Event7: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations_and_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.159. 事件7：自动启动，带阻尼隔离和被动设置
Functionality/Description: The AllowAutomaticStart attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：AllowAutomaticStart属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.160. Event7: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations_and_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.160. 事件7：自动启动，带阻尼隔离和被动设置
Functionality/Description: The DampPeerOscillations attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.161. Event7: AutomaticStart_with_DampPeerOscillations_and_PassiveTcpEstablishment
3.28.161. 事件7：自动启动，带阻尼隔离和被动设置
Functionality/Description: The PassiveTcpEstablishment attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/描述：被动设置属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event7
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.28.162. Event8: AutomaticStop
3.28.162. 事件8：自动停止
Functionality/Description: The AllowAutomaticStop attribute SHOULD be TRUE
功能/说明：AllowAutomaticStop属性应为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.29.163. Event12: DelayOpenTimer_Expires
3.29.163. 事件12:DelayOpenTimer\u过期
Functionality/Description: DelayOpen attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：DelayOpen属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.29.164. Event12: DelayOpenTimer_Expires
3.29.164. 事件12:DelayOpenTimer\u过期
Functionality/Description: DelayOpenTime attribute SHOULD be supported
功能/说明：应支持DelayOpenTime属性
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.29.165. Event12: DelayOpenTimer_Expires
3.29.165. 事件12:DelayOpenTimer\u过期
Functionality/Description: DelayOpenTimer SHOULD be supported
功能/说明：应支持DelayOpenTimer
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.29.166. Event13: IdleHoldTimer_Expires
3.29.166. 事件13:IdleHoldTimer\u过期
Functionality/Description: DampPeerOscillations attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：DampPeerOscillations属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event13
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event13
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.29.167. Event13: IdleHoldTimer_Expires
3.29.167. 事件13:IdleHoldTimer\u过期
Functionality/Description: IdleHoldTimer SHOULD have just expired
功能/说明：IdleHoldTimer应该刚刚过期
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event13
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O Don't support DampPeerOscillations
attribute and hence Event13
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.30.168. Event14: TcpConnection_Valid
3.30.168. 事件14:TcpConnection\u有效
Functionality/Description: BGP's destination port SHOULD be port 179
功能/说明：BGP的目标端口应为端口179
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.30.169. Event14: TcpConnection_Valid
3.30.169. 事件14:TcpConnection\u有效
Functionality/Description: The TrackTcpState attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：TrackTcpState属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O GateD NGC 2.0 provides hooks for the TCP state tracking, but use of this option depends OS support. Future versions will have additional hooks.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:O门控NGC 2.0为TCP状态跟踪提供挂钩，但此选项的使用取决于操作系统的支持。未来的版本将有额外的挂钩。
3.30.170. Event15: Tcp_CR_Invalid
3.30.170. 事件15:Tcp\u CR\u无效
Functionality/Description: BGP destination port number SHOULD be 179
功能/说明：BGP目标端口号应为179
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O GateD NGC 2.0 provides hooks for the TCP state tracking, but use of this option depends OS support. Future versions will have additional hooks.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:O门控NGC 2.0为TCP状态跟踪提供挂钩，但此选项的使用取决于操作系统的支持。未来的版本将有额外的挂钩。
3.31.171. Event19: BGPOpen
3.31.171. 事件19:BGPOpen
Functionality/Description: The DelayOpen optional attribute SHOULD be set to FALSE
功能/说明：DelayOpen可选属性应设置为FALSE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.31.172. Event19: BGPOpen
3.31.172. 事件19:BGPOpen
Functionality/Description: The DelayOpenTimer SHOULD not be running
功能/说明：DelayOpenTimer不应运行
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.31.173. Event20: BGPOpen with DelayOpenTimer Running
3.31.173. Event20:运行DelayOpenTimer的BGPOpen
Functionality/Description: The DelayOpen attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：DelayOpen属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N Not applicable
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N Not applicable
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.31.174. Event20: BGPOpen with DelayOpenTimer Running
3.31.174. Event20:运行DelayOpenTimer的BGPOpen
Functionality/Description: The DelayOpenTimer SHOULD be running
功能/说明：DelayOpenTimer应该正在运行
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: n/a
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.31.175. Event23: OpenCollisionDump
3.31.175. 事件23：OpenCollisionDump
Functionality/Description: If the state machine is to process this event in Established state, the CollisionDetectEstablishedState optional attribute SHOULD be set to TRUE
功能/说明：如果状态机要在已建立状态下处理此事件，则CollisionDetectTestAblishedState可选属性应设置为TRUE
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Collision detection event is logged. Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We always detect collision before we go to established state. Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O GateD NGC 2.0 does not support Collision Detection in Established state. This option attribute is always set to FALSE.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:记录了Y碰撞检测事件。Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:O我们总是在进入已建立状态之前检测碰撞。Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:O门控NGC 2.0不支持已建立状态下的碰撞检测。此选项属性始终设置为FALSE。
3.32.176. FSM
3.32.176. 密克罗尼西亚联邦
Functionality/Description: Separate FSM for each configured peer
功能/说明：为每个配置的对等机单独设置FSM
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.32.177. TCP Port 179
3.32.177. TCP端口179
Functionality/Description: A BGP implementation MUST connect to and listen on TCP port 179 for incoming connections in addition to trying to connect to peers
功能/描述：除了尝试连接到对等方之外，BGP实现还必须连接到TCP端口179并在其上侦听传入连接
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.32.178. Incoming Connections
3.32.178. 传入连接
Functionality/Description: A state machine MUST be instantiated
功能/说明：必须实例化状态机
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.33.179. Connection Collision
3.33.179. 连接冲突
Functionality/Description: The corresponding FSM for the connection that is closed SHOULD be disposed of
功能/说明：应处理已关闭连接的相应FSM
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.34.180. Event Numbers
3.34.180. 活动编号
Functionality/Description: Used to provide network management information
功能/说明：用于提供网络管理信息
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Not visible to operator. Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N Future Release of GateD NGC may support event numbers.
阿尔卡特是/否/备注：操作员看不到。Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:N Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:N NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:N门控NGC的未来版本可能支持事件编号。
3.35.181. ConnectRetryTimer
3.35.181. 连接计时器
Functionality/Description: Sufficiently large to allow TCP initialization
功能/说明：足够大以允许TCP初始化
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.35.182. Second Connection Tracking
3.35.182. 第二连接跟踪
Functionality/Description: In response to a TCP connection succeeds [Event 16 or Event 17], the 2nd connection SHALL be tracked until it sends an OPEN message
功能/说明：为响应TCP连接成功[事件16或事件17]，应跟踪第二个连接，直到其发送打开消息
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.183. UPDATE Message Handling
3.36.183. 更新消息处理
Functionality/Description: Does your implementation handle UPDATE messages in a manner compatible to the description in this section?
功能/描述：您的实现是否以与本节描述兼容的方式处理更新消息？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.184. WITHDRAWN ROUTES
3.36.184. 撤回路线
Functionality/Description: Any previously advertised routes whose destinations are contained in this field SHALL be removed from the Adj-RIB-In
功能/说明：任何先前公布的路线，其目的地包含在该字段中，应从Adj RIB中删除
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.185. WITHDRAWN ROUTES
3.36.185. 撤回路线
Functionality/Description: The BGP speaker SHALL run its Decision Process since the previously advertised route is no longer available for use
功能/说明：由于先前公布的路线不再可用，BGP扬声器应运行其决策过程
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.186. Implicit Withdraw
3.36.186. 隐式撤回
Functionality/Description: If an UPDATE message contains a feasible route, and the NLRI of the new route is identical to the one of a route currently stored in the Adj-RIB-In, then the new route SHALL replace the older route
功能/说明：如果更新消息包含可行的路由，且新路由的NLRI与Adj RIB in中当前存储的路由的NLRI相同，则新路由应替换旧路由
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.187. Other Feasible Routes
3.36.187. 其他可行路线
Functionality/Description: If an UPDATE message contains a feasible route, and the NLRI of the new route is not identical to the one of any route currently stored in the Adj-RIB-In, then the new route SHALL be placed in the Adj-RIB-In
功能/说明：如果更新消息包含可行路线，且新路线的NLRI与Adj RIB in中当前存储的任何路线的NLRI不同，则新路线应放置在Adj RIB in中
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.36.188. Adj-RIB-In Update
3.36.188. 调整肋骨在更新
Functionality/Description: Once a BGP speaker updates the Adj-RIB-In, it SHALL run its Decision Process
功能/说明：一旦BGP扬声器更新了Adj RIB In，则应运行其决策过程
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.37.189. Decision Process
3.37.189. 决策过程
Functionality/Description: Is your implementation compatible with the description in this section?
功能/说明：您的实现是否与本节中的说明兼容？
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.37.190. Degree of Preference
3.37.190. 优惠程度
Functionality/Description: SHALL NOT use as its inputs any of the following: the existence of other routes, the non-existence of other routes, or the path attributes of other routes
功能/说明：不得将以下任何内容用作其输入：存在其他路线、不存在其他路线或其他路线的路径属性
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.38. Phase 1: Calculation of Degree of Preference / Section 9.1.1 [RFC4271]
3.38. 第1阶段：偏好度计算/第9.1.1节[RFC4271]
3.38.191. Ineligible Degree of Preference
3.38.191. 不符合条件的优惠程度
Functionality/Description: The route MAY NOT serve as an input to the next phase of route selection
功能/说明：路线不能作为路线选择下一阶段的输入
RFC2119: MAY NOT
RFC2119：可能不会
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.38.192. Eligible Degree of Preference
3.38.192. 符合条件的优惠程度
Functionality/Description: Used as the LOCAL_PREF value in any IBGP re-advertisement
功能/说明：在任何IBGP重新发布中用作本地_PREF值
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.193. Unresolvable NEXT_HOP
3.39.193. 无法解决的下一跳
Functionality/Description: If the NEXT_HOP attribute of a BGP route depicts an address that is not resolvable, or it would become unresolvable if the route was installed in the routing table the BGP route MUST be excluded
功能/说明：如果BGP路由的下一跳属性描述了一个无法解析的地址，或者如果路由表中安装了该路由，则该属性将变得无法解析，则必须排除BGP路由
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.194. Routes Installed in LOC-RIB
3.39.194. 安装在LOC-RIB中的路线
Functionality/Description: The route in the Adj-RIBs-In identified as the best (see section 9.1.2) is installed in the Loc-RIB, replacing any route to the same destination that is currently being held in the Loc-RIB
功能/说明：被确定为最佳（见第9.1.2节）的调整肋中的路线安装在Loc肋中，以取代目前在Loc肋中保留的通往同一目的地的任何路线
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.195. Immediate Next-Hop Address
3.39.195. 立即下一跳地址
Functionality/Description: MUST be determined from the NEXT_HOP attribute of the selected route (see Section 5.1.3)
功能/说明：必须根据所选路线的下一跳属性确定（见第5.1.3节）
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.196. Phase 2: Route Selection
3.39.196. 第二阶段：路线选择
Functionality/Description: Performed again if either the immediate next hop or the IGP cost to the NEXT_HOP changes
功能/描述：如果下一跳的即时成本或下一跳的IGP成本发生变化，则再次执行
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.197. Immediate Next-Hop Address
3.39.197. 立即下一跳地址
Functionality/Description: Used for packet forwarding
功能/说明：用于数据包转发
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.198. Unresolvable Routes
3.39.198. 不可解路径
Functionality/Description: Removed from the Loc-RIB and the routing table
功能/说明：从Loc RIB和布线表中删除
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.39.199. Unresolvable Routes
3.39.199. 不可解路径
Functionality/Description: Kept in the corresponding Adj-RIBs-In
功能/说明：保存在中的相应调整肋中
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.40.200. Unresolvable Routes
3.40.200. 不可解路径
Functionality/Description: Excluded from the Phase 2 decision
功能/说明：不包括在第2阶段决策中
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.40.201. Multiple Matching Routes
3.40.201. 多条匹配路径
Functionality/Description: Only the longest matching route SHOULD be considered
功能/说明：仅应考虑最长的匹配路线
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.40.202. Mutual Recursion
3.40.202. 相互递归
Functionality/Description: If a route fails the resolvability check because of mutual recursion, an error message SHOULD be logged
功能/说明：如果路由由于相互递归而未通过可解析性检查，则应记录错误消息
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We have checks that disallow mutual
recursion, so this won't happen.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We have checks that disallow mutual
recursion, so this won't happen.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.41.203. Tie-Breaking Criteria
3.41.203. 打破平局的标准
Functionality/Description: Applied in the order specified
功能/说明：按指定顺序应用
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.41.204. Algorithm Used
3.41.204. 使用的算法
Functionality/Description: BGP implementations MAY use any algorithm which produces the same results as those described here
功能/说明：BGP实现可以使用任何产生与此处所述相同结果的算法
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.41.205. MULTI_EXIT_DISC Removal
3.41.205. 多出口盘拆卸
Functionality/Description: If done before re-advertising a route into IBGP, then comparison based on the received EBGP MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute MAY still be performed
功能/说明：如果在将路由重新播发到IBGP之前完成，则仍然可以基于收到的EBGP MULTI_EXIT_DISC属性进行比较
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.41.206. MULTI_EXIT_DISC Removal
3.41.206. 多出口盘拆卸
Functionality/Description: The optional comparison on MULTI_EXIT_DISC if performed at all MUST be performed only among EBGP learned routes
功能/说明：如果在MULTI_EXIT_光盘上执行可选比较，则必须仅在EBGP学习路径之间执行
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.41.207. MULTI_EXIT_DISC Comparison
3.41.207. 多出口光盘比较
Functionality/Description: Performed for IBGP learned routes
功能/说明：针对IBGP学习路线执行
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.42.208. Policy for processing routes from the Loc-RIB into Adj-RIBs-Out
3.42.208. 处理从Loc肋骨到Adj肋骨的路线的策略
Functionality/Description: Exclude a route in the Loc-RIB from being installed in a particular Adj-RIB-Out
功能/说明：将Loc肋中的管线排除在特定调整肋中
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.42.209. Adj-Rib-Out Route Installation
3.42.209. 调整肋出路线安装
Functionality/Description: Not unless the destination and NEXT_HOP described by this route may be forwarded appropriately by the Routing Table
功能/说明：除非此路由所描述的目的地和下一跳可由路由表适当转发，否则不会
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.42.210. Withdraw Routes
3.42.210. 撤退路线
Functionality/Description: If a route in Loc-RIB is excluded from a particular Adj-RIB-Out the previously advertised route in that Adj-RIB-Out MUST be withdrawn from service by means of an UPDATE message (see 9.2)
功能/说明：如果Loc RIB中的路线被排除在特定Adj RIB Out之外，则该Adj RIB Out中先前公布的路线必须通过更新消息退出服务（见9.2）
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.43.211. Overlapping Routes
3.43.211. 重叠路线
Functionality/Description: Consider both routes based on the configured acceptance policy
功能/描述：基于配置的接受策略考虑两条路线
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.43.212. Accepted Overlapping Routes
3.43.212. 可接受的重叠路线
Functionality/Description: The Decision Process MUST either install both routes or...
功能/说明：决策过程必须安装两个路由或。。。
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.43.213. Accepted Overlapping Routes
3.43.213. 可接受的重叠路线
Functionality/Description: Aggregate the two routes and install the aggregated route, provided that both routes have the same value of the NEXT_HOP attribute
功能/说明：聚合两条路由并安装聚合路由，前提是两条路由的下一跳属性值相同
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We install both in Local RIB.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N no automatic aggregation
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N no automatic aggregation
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We install both in Local RIB.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N no automatic aggregation
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N no automatic aggregation
3.43.214. Aggregation
3.43.214. 聚集
Functionality/Description: Either include all ASs used to form the aggregate in an AS_SET or add the ATOMIC_AGGREGATE attribute to the route
功能/说明：包括用于在AS_集合中形成聚合的所有ASs，或将原子_聚合属性添加到路由
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.43.215. De-Aggregation
3.43.215. 去聚集
Functionality/Description: Routes SHOULD NOT be de-aggregated
功能/说明：不应取消聚合路由
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.43.216. Route with the ATOMIC_AGGREGATE Attribute
3.43.216. 具有原子聚合属性的路由
Functionality/Description: Not de-aggregated
功能/说明：未反聚合
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.217. UPDATE Message Received from an Internal Peer
3.44.217. 从内部对等方接收的更新消息
Functionality/Description: Not re-distribute the routing information to other internal peers, unless the speaker acts as a BGP Route Reflector [RFC2796]
功能/说明：除非演讲者充当BGP路由反射器，否则不得将路由信息重新分发给其他内部对等方[RFC2796]
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.218. No Replacement Route
3.44.218. 没有替代路线
Functionality/Description: All newly installed routes and all newly unfeasible routes for which there is no replacement route SHALL be advertised to its peers by means of an UPDATE message
功能/说明：所有新安装的路由和所有新不可行的路由，如果没有替换路由，应通过更新消息通知其对等方
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.219. Previously Advertised Routes
3.44.219. 先前公布的路线
Functionality/Description: A BGP speaker SHOULD NOT advertise a given feasible BGP route if it would produce an UPDATE message containing the same BGP route as was previously advertised
功能/说明：如果BGP扬声器会生成一条更新消息，其中包含与先前公布的相同的BGP路由，则不应公布给定的可行BGP路由
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.220. Unfeasible Routes
3.44.220. 不可行的路线
Functionality/Description: Removed from the Loc-RIB
功能/说明：从Loc肋骨上移除
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.221. Changes to Reachable Destinations
3.44.221. 对可到达目的地的更改
Functionality/Description: Changes to the reachable destinations within its own autonomous system SHALL also be advertised in an UPDATE message
功能/说明：对其自主系统内可到达目的地的更改也应在更新消息中公布
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.222. A single route doesn't fit into the UPDATE message
3.44.222. 单个路由不适合更新消息
Functionality/Description: Don't advertise
功能/说明：不做广告
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.44.223. A single route doesn't fit into the UPDATE message
3.44.223. 单个路由不适合更新消息
Functionality/Description: Log an error local
功能/说明：记录本地错误
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.45.224. MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
3.45.224. MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
Functionality/Description: Minimum separation between two UPDATE messages sent by a BGP speaker to a peer that advertise feasible routes and/or withdrawal of unfeasible routes to some common set of destinations
功能/描述：BGP演讲者发送给对等方的两条更新消息之间的最小间隔，这两条更新消息向某些公共目的地组公布可行路由和/或撤回不可行路由
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.45.225. Fast Convergence
3.45.225. 快速收敛
Functionality/Description: MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer used for internal peers SHOULD be shorter than the MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer used for external peers, or
功能/说明：用于内部对等点的MinRoutedVertisementTinterValimer应短于用于外部对等点的MinRoutedVertisementTinterValimer，或
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O Configurable on per peer basis. Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N they are same for ebgp and ibgp NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y Configuration option allows to set the time per peer.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:O可在每个对等基础上配置。Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:N它们对于ebgp和ibgp NextHop是相同的Y/N/O/Comments:Y配置选项允许设置每个对等点的时间。
3.45.226. Fast Convergence
3.45.226. 快速收敛
Functionality/Description: The procedure describes in this section SHOULD NOT apply for routes sent to internal peers
功能/说明：本节中描述的程序不适用于发送给内部对等方的路由
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: O Operator has to ensure that through configuration. Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y Default setting is off for BGP peers.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:O运营商必须确保通过配置。Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:N NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:Y BGP对等点的默认设置为off。
3.45.227. MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
3.45.227. MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
Functionality/Description: The last route selected SHALL be
advertised at the end of MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
Functionality/Description: The last route selected SHALL be
advertised at the end of MinRouteAdvertisementIntervalTimer
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.228. MULTI_EXIT_DISC
3.46.228. 多出口光盘
Functionality/Description: Routes that have different MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute SHALL NOT be aggregated
功能/说明：不应聚合具有不同多出口光盘属性的路由
RFC2119: SHALL NOT
RFC2119：不应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.229. AS_SET as the First Element
3.46.229. 设置为第一个元素
Functionality/Description: If the aggregated route has an AS_SET as the first element in its AS_PATH attribute, then the router that originates the route SHOULD NOT advertise the MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute with this route
功能/说明：如果聚合路由的AS_设置为其AS_路径属性中的第一个元素，则发起路由的路由器不应使用此路由播发MULTI_EXIT_DISC属性
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.230. NEXT_HOP
3.46.230. 下一步
Functionality/Description: When aggregating routes that have different NEXT_HOP attribute, the NEXT_HOP attribute of the aggregated route SHALL identify an interface on the BGP speaker that performs the aggregation
功能/说明：聚合具有不同下一跳属性的路由时，聚合路由的下一跳属性应标识BGP扬声器上执行聚合的接口
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.231. ORIGIN INCOMPLETE
3.46.231. 起源不完全
Functionality/Description: Used if at least one route among routes that are aggregated has ORIGIN with the value INCOMPLETE
功能/说明：如果聚合的路由中至少有一个路由具有值为“不完整”的源，则使用此选项
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.232. ORIGIN EGP
3.46.232. 起源EGP
Functionality/Description: Used if at least one route among routes that are aggregated has ORIGIN with the value EGP
功能/说明：如果聚合的路由中至少有一条路由具有值EGP的来源，则使用此选项
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.233. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.233. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: The aggregated AS_PATH attribute SHALL satisfy all of the following conditions: ...
功能/说明：聚合为路径属性应满足以下所有条件：。。。
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.234. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.234. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: All tuples of type AS_SEQUENCE in the aggregated AS_PATH SHALL appear in all of the AS_PATH in the initial set of routes to be aggregated
功能/说明：聚合AS_路径中AS_序列类型的所有元组应出现在待聚合路由初始集合中的所有AS_路径中
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.235. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.235. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: All tuples of type AS_SET in the aggregated AS_PATH SHALL appear in at least one of the AS_PATH in the initial set
功能/说明：聚合AS_路径中AS_集类型的所有元组应至少出现在初始集的一个AS_路径中
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.236. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.236. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: For any tuple X of type AS_SEQUENCE in the aggregated AS_PATH which precedes tuple Y in the aggregated AS_PATH, X precedes Y in each AS_PATH in the initial set which contains Y, regardless of the type of Y
功能/说明：对于聚合AS_路径中位于元组Y之前的聚合AS_路径中的任何类型为AS_序列的元组X，无论Y的类型如何，初始集合中包含Y的每个AS_路径中的X都位于Y之前
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.237. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.237. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: No tuple of type AS_SET with the same value SHALL appear more than once in the aggregated AS_PATH
功能/说明：具有相同值的AS_SET类型的元组不得在聚合AS_路径中出现多次
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.238. Routes to be aggregated have different AS_PATH attributes
3.46.238. 要聚合的路由具有不同的AS_路径属性
Functionality/Description: Multiple tuples of type AS_SEQUENCE with the same value may appear in the aggregated AS_PATH only when adjacent to another tuple of the same type and value
功能/说明：只有当与另一个具有相同类型和值的元组相邻时，具有相同值的多个类型为\u序列的元组才可能出现在聚合为\u路径中
RFC2119: N/A
RFC2119：不适用
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.239. AS_PATH Aggregation Algorithm
3.46.239. AS_路径聚合算法
Functionality/Description: Able to perform the (minimum) algorithm described in 9.2.2.2.
功能/说明：能够执行9.2.2.2中描述的（最小）算法。
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We don't do merging.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N We don't do merging.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.240. ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
3.46.240. 原子聚集体
Functionality/Description: The aggregated route SHALL have this attribute if at least one of the routes to be aggregated has it
功能/说明：如果至少有一个要聚合的路由具有此属性，则聚合路由应具有此属性
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.241. AGGREGATOR
3.46.241. 聚合器
Functionality/Description: Attribute from routes to be aggregated MUST NOT be included in aggregated route
功能/说明：要聚合的路由中的属性不得包含在聚合路由中
RFC2119: MUST NOT
RFC2119：不得
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.46.242. AGGREGATOR
3.46.242. 聚合器
Functionality/Description: Attach a new one when aggregating (see Section 5.1.7)
功能/说明：聚合时附加一个新功能（见第5.1.7节）
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.47.243. Unstable Routes
3.47.243. 不稳定路线
Functionality/Description: Avoid using them
功能/说明：避免使用它们
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.47.244. Route Changes
3.47.244. 路线变更
Functionality/Description: SHOULD NOT make rapid spontaneous changes to the choice of route
功能/说明：不应对路线选择进行快速自发更改
RFC2119: SHOULD NOT
RFC2119:不应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.48.245. Non-BGP Acquired Routes
3.48.245. 非BGP获取路由
Functionality/Description: Distributed to other BGP speakers within the local AS as part of the update process (see Section 9.2)
功能/说明：作为更新过程的一部分，分发给本地的其他BGP扬声器（见第9.2节）
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.48.246. Non-BGP Acquired Routes
3.48.246. 非BGP获取路由
Functionality/Description: Distribution controlled via configuration
功能/说明：通过配置控制分发
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.247. Optional Timers
3.49.247. 可选定时器
Functionality/Description: Two optional timers MAY be supported: DelayOpenTimer, IdleHoldTimer by BGP
功能/说明：可支持两个可选计时器：延迟OpenTimer、IdleHoldTimer by BGP
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We support DelayOpenTimer but not
IdleHoldTimer
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y support IdleHoldTimer but not the
DelayOpenTimer
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We support DelayOpenTimer but not
IdleHoldTimer
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y support IdleHoldTimer but not the
DelayOpenTimer
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.248. Hold Time
3.49.248. 等待时间
Functionality/Description: Configurable on a per peer basis
功能/描述：可在每个对等基础上配置
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.249. Timers
3.49.249. 计时器
Functionality/Description: Allow the other timers to be configurable
功能/说明：允许配置其他计时器
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.250. Jitter
3.49.250. 抖动
Functionality/Description: Applied to the timers associated with MinASOriginationInterval, KeepAlive, MinRouteAdvertisementInterval, and ConnectRetry
功能/说明：应用于与MinASOriginationInterval、KeepAlive、MinRouteAdvertisementInterval和ConnectRetry关联的计时器
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We only apply to ConnectRetry.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: O We only apply to ConnectRetry.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.251. Jitter
3.49.251. 抖动
Functionality/Description: Apply the same jitter to each of these quantities regardless of the destinations to which the updates are being sent; that is, jitter need not be configured on a "per peer" basis
功能/说明：对这些数量中的每一个应用相同的抖动，无论更新发送到哪个目的地；也就是说，不需要在“每个对等”的基础上配置抖动
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y We apply same only for connectretry.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y We apply same only for connectretry.
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.252. Default Amount of jitter
3.49.252. 默认抖动量
Functionality/Description: Determined by multiplying the base value of the appropriate timer by a random factor which is uniformly distributed in the range from 0.75 to 1.0
功能/说明：通过将适当计时器的基本值乘以均匀分布在0.75到1.0范围内的随机因子来确定
RFC2119: SHALL
RFC2119：应
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Range is 0.9 to 1.1
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Range is 0.9 to 1.1
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.253. Default Amount of jitter
3.49.253. 默认抖动量
Functionality/Description: New random value picked each time the timer is set
功能/说明：每次设置计时器时拾取的新随机值
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
3.49.254. Jitter Random Value Range
3.49.254. 抖动随机值范围
Functionality/Description: Configurable
功能/说明：可配置
RFC2119: MAY
RFC2119：五月
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
3.50.255. TCP PUSH Function Supported
3.50.255. 支持TCP推送功能
Functionality/Description: Each BGP message SHOULD be transmitted with PUSH flag set
功能/说明：每个BGP消息都应使用PUSH标志集进行传输
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O Depends on the TCP stack support. GateD 10, NGC can run over multiple stacks.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:O取决于TCP堆栈支持。门控10，NGC可以运行在多个堆栈上。
3.50.256. Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) Field Support
3.50.256. 区分服务代码点（DSCP）现场支持
Functionality/Description: TCP connections opened with bits 0-2 of the DSCP field set to 110 (binary)
功能/说明：打开TCP连接时，DSCP字段的位0-2设置为110（二进制）
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: O Depends on the TCP stack support. GateD 10, NGC can run over multiple stacks.
阿尔卡特Y/N/O/Comments:Y Cisco Y/N/O/Comments:Y Laurel Y/N/O/Comments:Y NextHop Y/N/O/Comments:O取决于TCP堆栈支持。门控10，NGC可以运行在多个堆栈上。
3.51.257. Avoid Excessive Route Flapping
3.51.257. 避免过度的路线摆动
Functionality/Description: A BGP speaker which needs to withdraw a destination and send an update about a more specific or less specific route SHOULD combine them into the same UPDATE message
功能/说明：需要撤回目的地并发送关于更具体或不太具体路线的更新的BGP扬声器应将其合并到同一更新消息中
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
3.52.258. Multiple Instances in AS_PATH
3.52.258. AS_路径中的多个实例
Functionality/Description: The last instance (rightmost occurrence) of that AS number is kept
功能/说明：保留该AS编号的最后一个实例（最右边的引用）
RFC2119: SHOULD
RFC2119：应该
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N We use algorithm in 9.2.2.2
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: N We use algorithm in 9.2.2.2
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: N
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: N
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: N
3.53.259. Authentication Mechanism
3.53.259. 认证机制
Functionality/Description: A BGP implementation MUST support the authentication mechanism specified in RFC 2385 [RFC2385].
功能/说明：BGP实现必须支持RFC 2385[RFC2385]中指定的身份验证机制。
RFC2119: MUST
RFC2119：必须
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Alcatel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Cisco Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Laurel Y/N/O/Comments: Y
NextHop Y/N/O/Comments: Y
Three implementations responded to a call (5/20/04-6/2/04) for information on those implementations that had a BGP implementation, but did not complete the full survey. The responses for the call for additional information are below.
有三个实施响应了一个电话（5/20/04-6/2/04），询问那些实施了BGP但未完成全面调查的实施的信息。下面是对额外信息的回复。
If you have an implementation of BGP and you did not send in an implementation report (answering the 259 questions), could you send me the answer the following questions:
如果您实施了BGP，但没有提交实施报告（回答259个问题），您能否将以下问题的答案发送给我：
1) BGP product Contributor (your name):Curtis Villamizar [curtis@fictitious.org] Company: Avici name of product: IPriori (TM) minor version: No interoperability problems with any version.
1) BGP产品贡献者（您的姓名）：Curtis Villamizar[curtis@fictitious.org]公司：Avici产品名称：IPriori（TM）次要版本：任何版本都没有互操作性问题。
Current deployed versions are 5.x and 6.0.x. Version 6.1 and beyond are tested against the latest BGP specification [RFC4271].
当前部署的版本是5.x和6.0.x。版本6.1及更高版本根据最新的BGP规范[RFC4271]进行测试。
2) What other implementations you interoperate with.
2) 您还可以与哪些其他实现进行互操作。
Cisco: IOS 12.0(22) Juniper: JUNOS (version not given)
Cisco:IOS 12.0（22）Juniper:JUNOS（未提供版本）
3) Do you inter-operate with:
3) 您是否与以下机构相互合作：
1) Alcatel BGP (release) - not tested
2) cisco BGP IOS 12.0(27)s - not tested
tested with IOS 12.0(22); BGP is the same
3) laurel BGP (specify release) - not tested
4) NextHop GateD - not tested
1) Alcatel BGP (release) - not tested
2) cisco BGP IOS 12.0(27)s - not tested
tested with IOS 12.0(22); BGP is the same
3) laurel BGP (specify release) - not tested
4) NextHop GateD - not tested
4) Did the length of the survey for BGP cause you to not submit the BGP implementation report?
4) BGP调查的长度是否导致您不提交BGP实施报告？
yes
对
4.2. Data Connection Ltd.
4.2. 数据连接有限公司。
If you have an implementation of BGP and you did not send in an implementation report (answering the 259 questions), could you send me the answer the following questions:
如果您实施了BGP，但没有提交实施报告（回答259个问题），您能否将以下问题的答案发送给我：
1) BGP product Contributor (your name): Mike Dell Company: Data Connection Ltd. name of product: DC-BGP version and minor of software: v1.1 release date: April 2003
1) BGP产品贡献者（您的姓名）：迈克·戴尔公司：数据连接有限公司产品名称：DC-BGP版本和软件版本：v1.1发布日期：2003年4月
2) What other implementations you interoperate with.
2) 您还可以与哪些其他实现进行互操作。
Cisco (12.0(26)S) Alcatal (7770 0BX) Agilent (Router Tester) Ixia (1600T) Netplane (Powercode) Nortel (Shasta 5000 BSN) Redback (SmartEdge 800) Riverstone (RS8000) Spirent (AX4000) IP Infusion (ZebOs) Nokia (IP400) Juniper (M5)
Cisco（12.0（26）S）Alcantal（7770 0BX）安捷伦（路由器测试仪）Ixia（1600T）网络平面（Powercode）北电（Shasta 5000 BSN）Redback（SmartEdge 800）Riverstone（RS8000）Spirent（AX4000）IP注入（ZebOs）诺基亚（IP400）Juniper（M5）
3) Do you inter-operate with
3) 你和他有合作吗
1) Alcatel BGP (release) YES 2) cisco BGP IOS 12.0(27)s Unknown, but we do inter-operate with v12.0(26)s 3) laurel BGP (specify release) Unknown 4) NextHop GateD YES
1) 阿尔卡特BGP（发行版）是2）思科BGP IOS 12.0（27）未知，但我们确实与v12.0（26）s 3）劳雷尔BGP（指定发行版）未知4）下一个版本互操作是
4) Did the length of the survey for BGP cause you to not submit the BGP implementation report?
4) BGP调查的长度是否导致您不提交BGP实施报告？
YES
对
If you have an implementation of BGP and you did not send in an implementation report (answering the 259 questions), could you send me the answer the following questions:
如果您实施了BGP，但没有提交实施报告（回答259个问题），您能否将以下问题的答案发送给我：
1) BGP product
1) BGP产品
Contributor (your name):Rahul Bahadur (rahul.bahadur@nokia.com) Company: Nokia Name of product: IP Security Platforms Version and minor of software IPSO 3.8 Build031 Release date May 24, 2004
投稿人（您的姓名）：Rahul Bahadur（Rahul。bahadur@nokia.com)公司：诺基亚产品名称：IP安全平台软件IPSO 3.8 Build031版本和次要版本发布日期2004年5月24日
2) What other implementations you interoperate with.
2) 您还可以与哪些其他实现进行互操作。
Cisco: IOS 12.3(1) Extreme: Extremeware Version 6.1.7 (Build 9) Foundry: SW Version 07.5.05iT53 Juniper: JUNOS 5.3R1.2 Nortel: BayRS 15.4.0.1 GNU Zebra: zebra-0.92a
思科：IOS 12.3（1）极限：极限软件版本6.1.7（构建9）代工：软件版本07.5.05iT53 Juniper:JUNOS 5.3R1.2北电：BayRS 15.4.0.1 GNU Zebra:Zebra-0.92a
3) Do you inter-operate with
3) 你和他有合作吗
1) Alcatel BGP (release) - not tested 2) cisco BGP IOS 12.0(27)s - yes 3) laurel BGP (specify release) - not tested 4) NextHop GateD - not tested
1) 阿尔卡特BGP（发布版）-未测试2）思科BGP IOS 12.0（27）s-是3）劳雷尔BGP（指定发布版）-未测试4）下一代门控-未测试
4) Did the length of the survey for BGP cause you to not submit the BGP implementation report?
4) BGP调查的长度是否导致您不提交BGP实施报告？
Yes - lack of resources to help with task.
是-缺乏帮助完成任务的资源。
This document does not address any security issues.
本文件不涉及任何安全问题。
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, Eds., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006.
[RFC4271]Rekhter，Y.，Li，T.，和S.Hares编辑，“边境网关协议4（BGP-4）”，RFC 42712006年1月。
[RFC1771] Rekhter, Y. and T. Li, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 1771, March 1995.
[RFC1771]Rekhter，Y.和T.Li，“边境网关协议4（BGP-4）”，RFC 17711995年3月。
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2119]Bradner，S.，“RFC中用于表示需求水平的关键词”，BCP 14，RFC 2119，1997年3月。
[RFC2385] Heffernan, A., "Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option", RFC 2385, August 1998.
[RFC2385]Heffernan，A.，“通过TCP MD5签名选项保护BGP会话”，RFC 2385，1998年8月。
[RFC2796] Bates, T., Chandra, R., and E. Chen, "BGP Route Reflection - An Alternative to Full Mesh IBGP", RFC 2796, April 2000.
[RFC2796]Bates，T.，Chandra，R.，和E.Chen，“BGP路线反射-全网格IBGP的替代品”，RFC 2796，2000年4月。
[RFC2918] Chen, E., "Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4", RFC 2918, September 2000.
[RFC2918]Chen，E.“BGP-4的路由刷新能力”，RFC 2918，2000年9月。
[RFC3065] Traina, P., McPherson, D., and J. Scudder, "Autonomous System Confederations for BGP", RFC 3065, February 2001.
[RFC3065]Traina，P.，McPherson，D.，和J.Scudder，“BGP自治系统联合会”，RFC 3065，2001年2月。
Alcatel responses provided by: Contact Name: Devendra Raut Contact EMail: Devendra.raut@Alcatel.com
阿尔卡特提供的回复：联系人姓名：Devendra Raut联系人电子邮件：Devendra。raut@Alcatel.com
Cisco Systems responses provided by:
Contact Name: Himanshu Shah, Ruchi Kapoor
Contact EMail: hhshah@cisco.com, ruchi@cisco.com
Cisco Systems responses provided by:
Contact Name: Himanshu Shah, Ruchi Kapoor
Contact EMail: hhshah@cisco.com, ruchi@cisco.com
Laurel responses provided by: Contact Name: Manish Vora Contact EMail: vora@laurelnetworks.com
Laurel回复提供人：联系人姓名：Manish Vora联系人电子邮件：vora@laurelnetworks.com
NextHop responses provided by: Contact Name: Susan Hares Contact EMail: skh@nexthop.com Additional Help: Matt Richardson, Shane Wright.
下一步回复：联系人姓名：Susan Hares联系人电子邮件：skh@nexthop.com其他帮助：马特·理查森，肖恩·赖特。
Authors' Addresses
作者地址
Susan Hares NextHop Technologies 825 Victors Way, Suite 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48108
Susan Hares NextHop Technologies密歇根州安娜堡维克多大道825号100室48108
Phone: 734.222.1610 EMail: skh@nexthop.com
电话：734.222.1610电子邮件：skh@nexthop.com
Alvaro Retana Cisco Systems, Inc. 7025 Kit Creek Rd. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
阿尔瓦罗·雷塔纳思科系统公司，地址：北卡罗来纳州三角研究公园基特克里克路7025号，邮编：27709
Phone: 919 392 2061 EMail: aretana@cisco.com
电话：919 392 2061电子邮件：aretana@cisco.com
Full Copyright Statement
完整版权声明
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
版权所有（C）互联网协会（2006年）。
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
本文件受BCP 78中包含的权利、许可和限制的约束，除其中规定外，作者保留其所有权利。
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
本文件及其包含的信息是按“原样”提供的，贡献者、他/她所代表或赞助的组织（如有）、互联网协会和互联网工程任务组不承担任何明示或暗示的担保，包括但不限于任何保证，即使用本文中的信息不会侵犯任何权利，或对适销性或特定用途适用性的任何默示保证。
Intellectual Property
知识产权
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
IETF对可能声称与本文件所述技术的实施或使用有关的任何知识产权或其他权利的有效性或范围，或此类权利下的任何许可可能或可能不可用的程度，不采取任何立场；它也不表示它已作出任何独立努力来确定任何此类权利。有关RFC文件中权利的程序信息，请参见BCP 78和BCP 79。
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
向IETF秘书处披露的知识产权副本和任何许可证保证，或本规范实施者或用户试图获得使用此类专有权利的一般许可证或许可的结果，可从IETF在线知识产权存储库获取，网址为http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
IETF邀请任何相关方提请其注意任何版权、专利或专利申请，或其他可能涵盖实施本标准所需技术的专有权利。请将信息发送至IETF的IETF-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
确认
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
RFC编辑器功能的资金由IETF行政支持活动（IASA）提供。