Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        S. Dawkins
Request for Comments: 7475                                        Huawei
BCP: 9                                                        March 2015
Updates: 2026, 2418
Category: Best Current Practice
ISSN: 2070-1721
        
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        S. Dawkins
Request for Comments: 7475                                        Huawei
BCP: 9                                                        March 2015
Updates: 2026, 2418
Category: Best Current Practice
ISSN: 2070-1721
        

Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area

增加IETF区域中的区域控制器数量

Abstract

摘要

This document removes a limit on the number of Area Directors who manage an Area in the definition of "IETF Area". This document updates RFC 2026 (BCP 9) and RFC 2418 (BCP 25).

本文件取消了“IETF区域”定义中对管理区域的区域主管数量的限制。本文件更新了RFC 2026(BCP 9)和RFC 2418(BCP 25)。

Status of This Memo

关于下段备忘

This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

本备忘录记录了互联网最佳实践。

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

本文件是互联网工程任务组(IETF)的产品。互联网工程指导小组(IESG)已批准将其出版。有关BCP的更多信息,请参见RFC 5741第2节。

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7475.

有关本文件当前状态、任何勘误表以及如何提供反馈的信息,请访问http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7475.

Copyright Notice

版权公告

Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

版权所有(c)2015 IETF信托基金和确定为文件作者的人员。版权所有。

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

本文件受BCP 78和IETF信托有关IETF文件的法律规定的约束(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)自本文件出版之日起生效。请仔细阅读这些文件,因为它们描述了您对本文件的权利和限制。从本文件中提取的代码组件必须包括信托法律条款第4.e节中所述的简化BSD许可证文本,并提供简化BSD许可证中所述的无担保。

Table of Contents

目录

   1.  Introduction and Scope  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Discussion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Normative Text Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
        
   1.  Introduction and Scope  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Discussion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Normative Text Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
        
1. Introduction and Scope
1. 导言和范围

This document updates RFC 2026 ([RFC2026], BCP 9) to remove a limit on the number of Area Directors who manage an Area in the definition of "IETF Area". This document also updates RFC 2418 ([RFC2418], BCP 25) to reflect this updated definition.

本文件更新了RFC 2026([RFC2026],BCP 9),以取消“IETF区域”定义中对管理区域的区域主管数量的限制。本文件还更新了RFC 2418([RFC2418],BCP 25),以反映更新后的定义。

The change described in this document is intended to allow the IESG additional flexibility in organizing the IETF's work. It does not make any changes to the role of an Area and does not argue that assigning more than two Area Directors to an Area is an optimal solution in the long run. In particular, this change is not intended to increase the size of the IESG significantly. If several Areas will require more than two Area Directors, the IESG should consider investigating alternative ways of organizing the IETF's work.

本文件中描述的变更旨在允许IESG在组织IETF工作时具有额外的灵活性。它不会对一个区域的角色进行任何更改,也不会认为从长远来看,为一个区域指派两名以上的区域主管是最佳解决方案。特别是,这一变化并不是为了显著增加IESG的规模。如果几个地区需要两个以上的地区董事,IESG应该考虑调查IETF的工作的其他方式。

2. Discussion
2. 讨论

In recent discussions, the IESG has explored splitting and combining Areas. One proposal resulted in a single Area that would be managed by three Area Directors.

在最近的讨论中,IESG探讨了拆分和合并领域。有一项提案产生了一个由三名区域主任管理的单一区域。

An Area managed by three Area Directors conflicts with this definition in Section 14, "DEFINITIONS OF TERMS" of RFC 2026 ([RFC2026]):

由三名区域主管管理的区域与RFC 2026([RFC2026])第14节“术语定义”中的定义相冲突:

IETF Area - A management division within the IETF. An Area consists of Working Groups related to a general topic such as routing. An Area is managed by one or two Area Directors.

IETF区域——IETF内的一个管理部门。区域由与路由等一般主题相关的工作组组成。一个区域由一个或两个区域主管管理。

A similar statement appears in Section 1, "Introduction" of RFC 2418 ([RFC2418]):

RFC 2418([RFC2418])的第1节“介绍”中也有类似的陈述:

Each IETF area is managed by one or two Area Directors (ADs).

每个IETF区域由一个或两个区域主管(ADs)管理。

While it's true that recent IESGs have had two Area Directors in each Area except for the General Area, the number of Area Directors in each Area has varied since the publication of RFC 1396 ([RFC1396]). (For reference, see <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/past-members.html>.)

虽然最近的IESG在每个区域(一般区域除外)都有两名区域主管,但自RFC 1396([RFC1396])发布以来,每个区域的区域主管数量有所不同。(有关参考,请参见<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/past-members.html>.)

This variation was due to a number of factors, including workload and personal preferences, and happened as a natural part of the IESG organizing itself to do the work the IESG is chartered to do.

这种变化是由许多因素造成的,包括工作量和个人偏好,并且作为IESG组织自己完成IESG被授权完成的工作的自然组成部分。

At one point, the IESG placed three Area Directors in a single Area (Scott Bradner, Deirdre Kostick, and Michael O'Dell, in the Operational & Management Requirements Area, between IETF 36 and IETF 37 in 1996).

在某一点上,IESG将三名区域主管安排在一个区域内(斯科特·布拉德纳、迪尔德雷·科斯蒂克和迈克尔·奥戴尔,1996年在IETF 36和IETF 37之间的运营和管理需求区域)。

The last time the IESG increased the number of Area Directors in an Area was when they requested that the Nominating Committee provide a second Area Director in the Routing Area in 1999. Although the number of Area Directors in an Area hasn't changed since then, the IESG continues to be responsible for specifying the positions that the Nominating Committee fills each year.

IESG上一次增加一个地区的地区总监数量是在1999年,当时他们要求提名委员会在路由地区提供第二位地区总监。尽管从那时起,某个地区的地区主管人数没有变化,但IESG仍然负责指定提名委员会每年填补的职位。

It is consistent with the IESG's role in creating and dismantling entire Areas to allow the IESG flexibility in assigning enough Area Directors who have been selected by the Nominating Committee to effectively manage the working groups within an Area.

这与IESG在创建和拆除整个区域方面的作用是一致的,以允许IESG灵活地分配提名委员会选出的足够多的区域主任,以有效管理区域内的工作组。

Note the requirement in RFC 7437 ([RFC7437], BCP 10) that the Nominating Committee review (approximately) half the positions for the IESG each year is unchanged. The Nominating Committee may assign an appropriate term duration for each position to ensure the ideal application of this rule in the future, and this is also unchanged.

请注意RFC 7437([RFC7437],BCP 10)中的要求,即提名委员会每年审查(大约)半数IESG职位不变。提名委员会可为每个职位指定适当的任期,以确保该规则在未来的理想应用,这一点也不变。

3. Normative Text Change
3. 规范性文本变更

For this text (OLD) in Section 14, "DEFINITIONS OF TERMS" of RFC 2026 ([RFC2026]):

对于RFC 2026([RFC2026])第14节“术语定义”中的文本(原文本):

IETF Area - A management division within the IETF. An Area consists of Working Groups related to a general topic such as routing. An Area is managed by one or two Area Directors.

IETF区域——IETF内的一个管理部门。区域由与路由等一般主题相关的工作组组成。一个区域由一个或两个区域主管管理。

Replace with this text (NEW):

替换为以下文本(新):

IETF Area - A management division within the IETF. An Area consists of Working Groups related to a general topic such as routing. An Area is managed by one or more Area Directors.

IETF区域——IETF内的一个管理部门。区域由与路由等一般主题相关的工作组组成。一个区域由一个或多个区域主管管理。

For this text (OLD) in Section 1, "Introduction" of RFC 2418 ([RFC2418]):

对于RFC 2418([RFC2418])第1节“引言”中的文本(旧):

Each IETF area is managed by one or two Area Directors (ADs).

每个IETF区域由一个或两个区域主管(ADs)管理。

Replace with this text (NEW):

替换为以下文本(新):

Each IETF area is managed by one or more Area Directors (ADs).

每个IETF区域由一个或多个区域控制器(ADs)管理。

Informational RFCs such as RFC 3710 ([RFC3710]) and informal descriptions of IETF organizational structure that also describe IETF Areas as being managed by one or two Area Directors should be considered updated by this normative specification.

信息性RFC,如RFC 3710([RFC3710])和IETF组织结构的非正式描述,也描述了由一个或两个区域主管管理的IETF区域,应视为根据本规范进行更新。

4. Security Considerations
4. 安全考虑

This document updates an IETF process BCP and has no direct Internet security implications.

本文件更新了IETF过程BCP,没有直接的互联网安全影响。

5. References
5. 工具书类
5.1. Normative References
5.1. 规范性引用文件

[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026>.

[RFC2026]Bradner,S.,“互联网标准过程——第3版”,BCP 9,RFC 2026,1996年10月<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2026>.

[RFC2418] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, September 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2418>.

[RFC2418]Bradner,S.,“IETF工作组指南和程序”,BCP 25,RFC 2418,1998年9月<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2418>.

[RFC7437] Kucherawy, M., Ed., "IAB, IESG, and IAOC Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees", BCP 10, RFC 7437, January 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7437>.

[RFC7437]Kucherawy,M.,Ed.“IAB、IESG和IAOC选择、确认和召回流程:提名和召回委员会的运作”,BCP 10,RFC 7437,2015年1月<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7437>.

5.2. Informative References
5.2. 资料性引用

[RFC1396] Crocker, S., "The Process for Organization of Internet Standards Working Group (POISED)", RFC 1396, January 1993, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1396>.

[RFC1396]Crocker,S.“互联网标准工作组的组织过程(平衡)”,RFC 1396,1993年1月<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1396>.

[RFC3710] Alvestrand, H., "An IESG charter", RFC 3710, February 2004, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3710>.

[RFC3710]Alvestrand,H.,“IESG宪章”,RFC 37102004年2月<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3710>.

Acknowledgements

致谢

Thanks to Barry Leiba and Jari Arkko for applying the giggle test to version -00 of this document, and to Adrian Farrel, Alexey Melnikov, Brian Carpenter, Christer Holmberg, David Crocker, David Harrington, Donald Eastlake, Kathleen Moriarty, Murray Kucherawy, Susan Hares, Stephan Farrell, and Stewart Bryant for providing review comments.

感谢巴里·莱巴(Barry Leiba)和贾里·阿尔科(Jari Arkko)将傻笑测试应用于本文档的第00版,感谢阿德里安·法雷尔(Adrian Farrel)、亚历克赛·梅尔尼科夫(Alexey Melnikov)、布莱恩·卡彭特(Brian Carpenter)、克里斯特·霍姆伯格(Christer Holmberg)、大卫·克罗克(David Crocker)、大卫·哈林顿(David Harrington)、唐纳德·伊斯特莱克(Donald Eastlake)、凯瑟琳·莫里亚蒂(Kat。

Thanks to Fred Baker, Michael St. Johns, and Scott Bradner for providing a better understanding of the history of how the IESG ended up with two Area Directors in most Areas and even, at one point, three Area Directors in one Area.

感谢弗雷德·贝克(Fred Baker)、迈克尔·圣约翰(Michael St.Johns)和斯科特·布拉德纳(Scott Bradner)对IESG的历史有了更好的理解,IESG最终在大多数领域拥有两名区域总监,甚至在某一点上,在一个领域拥有三名区域总监。

Author's Address

作者地址

Spencer Dawkins Huawei Technologies

斯宾塞·道金斯华为技术有限公司

   EMail: spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com
        
   EMail: spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com